It's so ugly and makes me cringe when I recommend BW to people and they see it.Brilliant! I use them and they do work well but not best looking app, kinda basic and out of date really.
It's so ugly and makes me cringe when I recommend BW to people and they see it.Brilliant! I use them and they do work well but not best looking app, kinda basic and out of date really.
Same case for me but I'm 2+ years now with BW. I just keep 1PW around in case there's something I missed with the import.I was a long time 1Password user and downloaded and paid for Bitwarden.
After almost a year of using it I only keep 1Password on my Mac just in case but it hasn't been needed so far.
Bitwarden is now my go to.
After almost a year of using it I only keep 1Password on my Mac just in case but it hasn't been needed so far.
Looks like Bitwarden is going to have native apps soon. Can't come soon enough. Even though I'm really happy with BW their iOS app is so ugly and clunky.
demo:
story i spotted:
![]()
Bitwarden's app is about to get a lot prettier
Bitwarden’s next update will focus on eye candy and a native codebasewww.androidpolice.com
Brilliant! I use them and they do work well but not best looking app, kinda basic and out of date really.
Not sure, but either way it's ugly as hell. I'd much rather have the version in that YouTube video I linked.i thought the current one is native already? the desktop one is Electron I think.
Not sure, but either way it's ugly as hell. I'd much rather have the version in that YouTube video I linked.
I looked at my bitwarden app, and I guess I don't see the issues with the UX. It looks just fine to me, it isn't like I live there anyway.still ugly, but I chose free+functionality than pay 1password $3/month in their cloud service for a better looking password manager.
I may be wrong but UX design seems to be the easy part compared to programming software. IDK why foss developers don't care about this aspect all though they do the heavy work of complete apps. 1password looks so much appealing to the eyes and more intuitive.
![]()
Because power users don't care about beauty. They just want things to be fast and to work as intended. Both don't apply to 1Password.I may be wrong but UX design seems to be the easy part compared to programming software. IDK why foss developers don't care about this aspect all though they do the heavy work of complete apps. 1password looks so much appealing to the eyes and more intuitive.
I may be wrong but UX design seems to be the easy part compared to programming software. IDK why foss developers don't care about this aspect all though they do the heavy work of complete apps. 1password looks so much appealing to the eyes and more intuitive.
Exactly why I'm a happy (and paying) Bitwarden user. 95% of the time I'm just using autofill and never looking at the UI.I looked at my bitwarden app, and I guess I don't see the issues with the UX. It looks just fine to me, it isn't like I live there anyway.
I may be wrong but UX design seems to be the easy part compared to programming software. IDK why foss developers don't care about this aspect all though they do the heavy work of complete apps.
Same here. It's priced reasonably for what it does so I happily pay...No no no I disagree completely. Good design is hard as hell. I'm good at moving bits around but making them look pretty? Completely lost.
Exactly why I'm a happy (and paying) Bitwarden user. 95% of the time I'm just using autofill and never looking at the UI.
Because power users don't care about beauty. They just want things to be fast and to work as intended. Both don't apply to 1Password.
The second reason I can think of: Either you want a consistent UI on all platforms or you don't. Translating a Mac UI to Windows won't work and vice versa. They never look the same. So I guess they keep their simplistic UI that works for all systems. And don't waste time and money and something everyone will be mad about. Mac people about their icons, Windows people about theirs.
I'm someone who comes from always using the nicest and most beautiful apps and then I stopped with it because it is distracting at best. Nowadays I use Mac apps and simple apps. I use Apple Notes, I use Bitwarden, Mailmate, Kitty, Keyboard Maestro... they all don't have those beautiful Mac designs and User Interfaces where you drag stuff across the screen to drop it somewhere else. But they work.
No no no I disagree completely. Good design is hard as hell. I'm good at moving bits around but making them look pretty? Completely lost.
Power users are just as diverse as others with respect to the effect UX design has on them, so I don't think the consumer is a factor in this.
Serious UX design is a different skillset than software development. Often, the professionals who are doing it are graphic designers. I suppose there are various reasons that they have a limited impact in the open source world. I can make some guesses. (Really, just guesses)
Companies often contribute their developers to open source projects because they use those projects in their own products. However, they have to differentiate their products in the eyes of their users and the users are most impacted by the UX. It seems less likely that companies would contribute their designers in the same way they would their developers.
Open source projects attract developers because they get to learn stuff and make provably beneficial contributions. A designer would have less to gain and great barriers to contribution. Some members of the project would like their contributions and others wouldn't. It would be a crapshoot whether their efforts would be wasted.
Scientists collaborate. Artists, not so much.
Maybe because people who can read assembly code do not understand us simpletons need an intuitive and inviting UI to be able to use the software. Reminds me of linux users that use the terminal for everything.
Maybe because people who can read assembly code do not understand us simpletons need an intuitive and inviting UI to be able to use the software. Reminds me of linux users that use the terminal for everything.
[…]
I am no programming, but sounds to me the software in the background running Amazon.com is a much more complex task that deciding where to place the buttons and choosing the fonts and colors.
Scientists collaborate. Artists, not so much.
100% agree. Both are skills that take a lot of time and effort to hone.I wouldn't go so far as to say that design is more difficult than development, but I will go so far as to say that the humanistic aspects of design and development are the most gruelling, and require far more effort than meets the eye.
Having ability is not a recipe for inability.
My professional background is in design, but I have done both design and development. Your description of design is misleadingly reductive. If it was only placing buttons and choosing fonts, everyone would do it, and do it well. By that logic, programming is mostly just typing. I wouldn't go so far as to say that design is more difficult than development, but I will go so far as to say that the humanistic aspects of design and development are the most gruelling, and require far more effort than meets the eye. Storing and retrieving data correctly is comparatively easy to validate and troubleshoot compared to designing and developing interfacing in a way that will be understandable and useful to the largest number of people. None of it is easy. And all of it turns out better when designers and developers collaborate from the early phases of a project inception.
I think most of what you wrote is spot-on, except this last bit. Design is not art, and designers are not artists. Professional UI & UX design is a near constant collaboration. I don't think a lack of desire to collaborate is a reason for lack of involvement in open source design. I'd guess that most of what you wrote is true, and I would also add that Designers tend to make much less money than Developers, which leads to them having much less time for speculative projects. Furthermore, Designers tend not to get as much respect as Developers, and these collaborations can often be too thankless. Lastly, bear in mind that the entire collaborative tool-chain often used in these ventures, is geared towards Development. I have yet to see a good version control / collaboration toolset for design.
Christian interned at Apple and devoted all of his time to making apps with great design *and* great internals. He's an absolute master of his crafts. Just because he did it solo doesn't mean what he did isn't extremely difficult.Ex. Christian Selig is just 1 developer who created a much better looking and much more intuitive Reddit app all on his own over the official Reddit app which is made by an organization estimated worth $6.4Billion at IPO.
I am not sure what you are trying to say here.
Maybe because people who can read assembly code do not understand us simpletons need an intuitive and inviting UI to be able to use the software. Reminds me of linux users that use the terminal for everything.
Design is not art, and designers are not artists.
Are stolen Last Pass Encrypted vaults being cracked? In 2022 LastPass CEO Karim Toubba said that while the encrypted vaults were stolen, only customers knew the master password required to decrypt them. But here we are and Hackers have stolen $4.4 million in cryptocurrency on October 25th 2023, using private keys and passphrases stored in stolen LastPass databases. So it seems they cracked those databases I guess. Maybe the master password they used was weak. Maybe not.
I do hope all those people changed ALL their passwords stored in their encrypted vaults....Harvest Now, Decrypt Later attacks are underway I guess.
You wrote
I'll augment my comment, "Having ability is not a recipe for inability", to
"Having ability to read assembly code and use the terminal does not result in the inability to understand simpletons."