You need to know what version you have. MacPro1,1 are 4 core machines made in 2006/7, MacPro2,1 is 8 core made in 2007, MacPro3,1 was both 4 and 8 cores made in 2008, and the 2009's are MacPro4,1 both 4 and 8 core. Let the collective know then someone can help you out.
Then any of the 51xx or 53xx series should work just fine.
that should be a huge improvement. I thought long and hard before opting for the 2.66's over the 2.33's. hope you win. My aim right now is to figure out if it's possible for "about this mac" to correctly report the processors. I have windows xp running under bootcamp, and windows reports them correctly....
and don't worry about melting the motherboard. The general belief is that all the internals of every mac pro of that generation is the same, from the 2.0GHz quad core to the 3.0 GHz 8-core.
Both parts are up:
Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmz7gPw31L0
Part 2:
http://youtu.be/phzn8MPaDtQ
Enjoy!
Thanks for the videos.
I'm a little late to this whole thing of upgrading my 2.0 MP, but I just wanted to ask some questions before going a head and buying my processors.
1. Has anyone upgraded to the X5365 Xeons running at 3 GHz? I just recently found these pretty cheap, and am considering buying a matched pair for around $500.
2. Has anyone ran into issues besides running hotter?
Hopefully this will revive an old thread, and maybe some people could share the performance they have had since doing the upgrade.
X5355's @ 2.66GHz are significantly cheaper and the loss in computing power is hard to notice imo.1. Has anyone upgraded to the X5365 Xeons running at 3 GHz? I just recently found these pretty cheap, and am considering buying a matched pair for around $500.
Not really an issue you would probably notice, but the latest stepping not only needs less power in idle mode (= less heat), but you also don't need to worry too much about microkernel updates to the CPU (most of them already present in the latest stepping), which normally come with Apple's patches and won't happen with earlier steppings in this situation, as the new CPU's are not properly recognized in a MP 1,1. There are hacks to at least display the correct identification in "About this Mac", but i don't know whether those would also (re-)enable automatic microkernel updates for those new CPU's.2. Has anyone ran into issues besides running hotter?
Hopefully this will revive an old thread, and maybe some people could share the performance they have had since doing the upgrade.
X5355's @ 2.66GHz are significantly cheaper and the loss in computing power is hard to notice imo.
According to Geekbench results the performance roughly doubles, however that depends massively on your usage scenario. There are still not that many applications to make real use of the increased core count (except for the usual suspects like handbrake and other video-intensive programs).
Have a look at this link from Apple Discussions. It is quite lengthy and contains some great information.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2809634?start=45&tstart=0
I never had Kernel Panics after upgrading to a pair of X5355. However - that might be connected to[...]people were discussing the X5365 and Kernal Panics. [...]
Did anyone have [...] Kernal Panics as a result of their upgrade?
Yes, the discussions were very helpful. However, one thing I noticed toward the end of the article on the last page, people were discussing the X5365 and Kernal Panics. Some even stated they had to use an altered Apple Firmware [Apple Firmware 2,1 from Netkas Forums] to correct the issues with KP's.
Did anyone have to do this, or have Kernal Panics as a result of their upgrade?