Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

2016 nMP

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because it is Polaris related information and that is important information for next Mac Pro.

As a side note, how about this:
FirePro G300: 2560 GCN cores 4 GB of VRAM GDDR5
FirePro G500: 3584 GCN cores 8 GB of HBM2
FirePro G700: 4096 GCN cores 16 GB of HBM2
 
koyoot said:
LOL Wut? When I did said that? 😀

In order to maintain backwards compatibility with PS4 PS4K must use similar binary code for the architecture, without software emulation, of the previous version of GCN, IF Sony will use Polaris chip in the PS4K. It was confirmed by PS4 game developer, who had the GPU on his hands, and it was confirmed by person who is responsible for Linux drivers.
Polaris is not backwards compatible with previous generations of GCN, without software emulation of them - drivers.

Thats why they cannot use Polaris in PS4K IF they want backwards compatibility with PS4.

Melodist, Nvidia pretty much did 1.9x more performance in the same thermal envelope for their midrange GPU.
Click to expand...
Yeah I mis read that
 
koyoot said:
Guys, the words I am saying to you about PS4K are coming from PS4 game developer, who had in hands both GPUs.

They are not compatible on software side. Binary code will be different on Polaris, therefore backwards compatibility with previous generations of GCN arch has to be emulated. Sony would need exact binary copy for Polaris GPU. But the arch. is different. PS4 OS does not have capabilities to do this.

There is no coincidence that today, day after debunking of rumors, there is another rumor about performance of mobile Polaris GPUs. What is worth noting is that GTX 1080M will have 2048 CUDA cores, and 1.3 GHz core clocks...

AMD yesterday played smart. They had to get rid of rumors, without disclosing anything. Today a lot of concrete news came about. There no coincidence in this.
Click to expand...

Why would games need to be recompiled for a new GPU? When a game ships for windows it doesn't ship with binaries for every GPU possible. Its all handled by the driver. Sure PS4 games may be optimized for GCN 1 but if Polaris is fast enough than it won't matter if its GCN 4. As long as they keep the CPU architecture the same then it shouldn't matter.


koyoot said:
Because it is Polaris related information and that is important information for next Mac Pro.

As a side note, how about this:
FirePro G300: 2560 GCN cores 4 GB of VRAM GDDR5
FirePro G500: 3584 GCN cores 8 GB of HBM2
FirePro G700: 4096 GCN cores 16 GB of HBM2
Click to expand...

Then I guess we are waiting for Vega for the next mac pro...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mago and pat500000
koyoot, that was my assumption the other day. Polaris 10 as the entry card, Vega 10 on the 2 higher levels. That would be awesome.
[doublepost=1463165836][/doublepost]If Vega is indeed coming in October, that's inline with what's expected. You wouldn't see it before anyway, most likely. And it might be worth the wait.
Maybe by then there is an updated spec for TB3...
 
Stacc said:
Why would games need to be recompiled for a new GPU? When a game ships for windows it doesn't ship with binaries for every GPU possible. Its all handled by the driver. Sure PS4 games may be optimized for GCN 1 but if Polaris is fast enough than it won't matter if its GCN 4. As long as they keep the CPU architecture the same then it shouldn't matter.
Click to expand...
Well, It is EXACTLY what I have written 😉.

You need drivers to keep binary code backwards compatible with previous generations of GCN. Sony OS is not capable of handling that. On PC level - no problem. But not for PS4K.
 
Smart move to disclose some info, but on (rumored) mobility parts.
Good enough to get people wondering on the actual performance of the desktop parts.
 
I guess AMD will have to cut down Vega to have a competitor to 1080, and maybe that's why it's coming out earlier, or so we hope.
 
ManuelGomes said:
koyoot, that was my assumption the other day. Polaris 10 as the entry card, Vega 10 on the 2 higher levels. That would be awesome.
[doublepost=1463165836][/doublepost]If Vega is indeed coming in October, that's inline with what's expected. You wouldn't see it before anyway, most likely. And it might be worth the wait.
Maybe by then there is an updated spec for TB3...
Click to expand...

Given what we know about Polaris 10, that its targeted for 125 - 150 W and that it has a good double precision ratio (1:3), it seems tailor made for the mac pro. If it can hit 6 TFLOPS on the high end that compares favorably to the D700 at 3.5 TFLOPS.
 
This is no coincidence that after yesterday's debunking of negative rumors of Polaris being postponed to October, today there is a leak of information of mobile Polaris parts. Important to note: GTX 1080M also has 2048 CUDA cores, and 1.3 GHz core clocks. Interesting, isn't it?

Both companies are looking at hands of each other 😉.
 
Funny GPU-Z not having at least Polaris preliminary support, without disclosing info of course.
AIDA64 has it, even Vega.
 
koyoot said:
Because it is Polaris related information and that is important information for next Mac Pro.

As a side note, how about this:
FirePro G300: 2560 GCN cores 4 GB of VRAM GDDR5
FirePro G500: 3584 GCN cores 8 GB of HBM2
FirePro G700: 4096 GCN cores 16 GB of HBM2
Click to expand...
Oh la laa!
 
Guys, that was only my speculation 😀. I thought that Apple could simply double the core count of the GPUs. It also would make sense for few reasons.
Release the G300 in June, it will be upgrade anyway for people who owned already Mac Pro 2013, and let the G500 and G700 as a built to order option with availability in October or wherever it will be possible.
 
I was still thinking, that with nMP v2 Apple would go with
  • Tonga Pro (same part as M395, but cut-price) GDDR5 TDP 125W 2GB (3 TFLOPs)
  • Ellesmere Pro GDDR5 4GB (4.5 TFLOPs)
  • Ellesmere XT w GDDR5/X 8GB (6 TFLOPs)
I put Tonga there, because Apple always tries to make the entry machine less attractive. And because after Polaris, it will be cheap.

And that fleet is ready for sell directly after WWDC.
 
koyoot said:
Guys, that was only my speculation 😀. I thought that Apple could simply double the core count of the GPUs. It also would make sense for few reasons.
Release the G300 in June, it will be upgrade anyway for people who owned already Mac Pro 2013, and let the G500 and G700 as a built to order option with availability in October or wherever it will be possible.
Click to expand...

Has Apple ever updated its BTO options without a corresponding hardware refresh? Only thing that seems to qualify would be the 2012 update to the Mac Pro, but given that the Mac Pro was in single-config CYO mode at that time it doesn't seem to quite count.

Zarniwoop said:
I was still thinking, that with nMP v2 Apple would go with
  • Tonga Pro (same part as M395, but cut-price) GDDR5 TDP 125W 2GB (3 TFLOPs)
  • Ellesmere Pro GDDR5 4GB (4.5 TFLOPs)
  • Ellesmere XT w GDDR5/X 8GB (6 TFLOPs)
I put Tonga there, because Apple always tries to make the entry machine less attractive. And because after Polaris, it will be cheap.

And that fleet is ready for sell directly after WWDC.
Click to expand...

I'd buy some more cut-down chip as the entry level as well, just because even with the dual-GPU focus there are some people who just don't need GPU power. Might as well max out the stuff they care about, especially if you get a lower entry-level price.
 
Zarniwoop said:
I was still thinking, that with nMP v2 Apple would go with
  • Tonga Pro (same part as M395, but cut-price) GDDR5 TDP 125W 2GB (3 TFLOPs)
  • Ellesmere Pro GDDR5 4GB (4.5 TFLOPs)
  • Ellesmere XT w GDDR5/X 8GB (6 TFLOPs)
I put Tonga there, because Apple always tries to make the entry machine less attractive. And because after Polaris, it will be cheap.

And that fleet is ready for sell directly after WWDC.
Click to expand...

This looks reasonable but it would be a shame to see a 2 GB card offered on the low end. If they could manage 16 GB of GDDR5X then we could see 4/8/16 GB options. The other thing I could see is Polaris 11 as the low end option. That way Polaris is standard across the lineup.
 
Stacc said:
The other thing I could see is Polaris 11 as the low end option. That way Polaris is standard across the lineup.
Click to expand...

But if Apple has to choose to use the limited quantity either for rMBP or nMP.. I think the choice is obvious.
 
Last edited:
But that horse is going to be a bit late from this summers fight.

Anyway, Polaris 10 is 30% smaller chip than GP104, so for Nvidia it's more difficult to compete with GTX1070's' price.. and lower yields. Polaris is going to be cost/performance king.

Update: AMD has put some M400 series data on their web site: http://www.amd.com/en-gb/products/graphics/notebook/r9-m200

R9 M485X 32CU 8GB GDDR5 1250MHz 256bit
R9 M470X 14CU 4GB GDDR5 1500MHz 128bit
R9 M470 12CU 4GB GDDR5 1500MHz 128bit

Update2: Are those rebranded?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back