Of course. I was just curious about the prices.
The iMac Pro starts with 32GB of RAM and 1TB of super-fast PCIe SSD storage. Those items would have been rather costly upgrades on older iMacs.
And yes... the 8-core Xeon and Vega graphics are in a whole other league too.
My point was... to anyone who thinks this computer is expensive... you're actually getting a lot compared to previous iMacs.
EDIT... I was sorta correct. I'm finding the maxed-out 2015 5K iMac was $4,100. And that was a 4c8t processor with OK-ish graphics.
So yeah... this iMac Pro is a beast.
Most definitely a beast! I had the top spec iMac in my basket last night, and I was doing the comparisons as you do. The difference was stark when you consider the processor and video card upgrades are monstrous. This is a killer iMac. I wouldn't splash £4K on the current iMac when I can splash £5k on the iMac Pro and get so much more bang for the buck.
Just praying my 2011 MacBook Pro (updated with 1TB SSD and 16GB RAM) holds out until Christmas. I have about 10-12 weddings to edit (4K video streams x 3) on there, but it's held out so far using Proxy media. If I can get to the end of the year with it and upgrade to the iMac Pro, the wait will have been worth it.
[doublepost=1496746073][/doublepost]
No iMac has ever used ECC RAM... so I'm guessing, no?
If you meant Mac Pro RAM... maybe. But 2013 was a looong time ago...
How much extra would we need to pay on this ECC RAM at a guess?
Here's a comparison:
Current iMac jump from 32GB RAM (which will be standard on the iMac Pro) to 64GB RAM is £720. If ECC RAM is more costly, then would it not be wise to think that Apple may make it £995 for the jump to 64GB RAM?
Interestingly, the jump for ECC RAM in the old Mac Pro was DDR3 and not DDR4, and that jump alone is £720 for the same movement of 32GB RAM to 64GB RAM....
Therefore, it's whether those jumps are default price jumps for the models, or more likely that we are going to have to pay a whole lot more for DDR4 ECC 64GB RAM.