I wouldn't expect anything too exciting. I have the latest 4K and it just feels very overpowered and underutilized. It runs the same programs and software as the Apple TV HD from 2015.
Disagree. This whole "Pro" thing is getting out of hand and losing its meaning.
Splitting all of your offerings into Pro and non pro can only go so far… Apple used to mostly make one device, and make it really really well. And people would pay a premium for it… not massive massive premium, but a premium.
When you start slicing and dicing certain categories of devices into regular and pro… i think the focus on making thebest devicegets a little lost. Apple TV is not a category where a Pro tier is even remotely appropriate.
And yet, Apple’s massive success began when they started creating tiers, with iPhone 6 and 6 Plus. Later iPhone 7 Plus featured an additional camera. 2017 brought 3 new offerings. The XR sold incredibly well, and so on until we’re here today and everyone seems to want the “Pro” (and mostly “Max) models that people like to crap on because of the branding.Splitting all of your offerings into Pro and non pro can only go so far… Apple used to mostly make one device, and make it really really well. And people would pay a premium for it… not massive massive premium, but a premium.
When you start slicing and dicing certain categories of devices into regular and pro… i think the focus on making thebest devicegets a little lost. Apple TV is not a category where a Pro tier is even remotely appropriate.
Thank you! My thoughts exactly (I had just replied with something along these lines, but really enjoyed your post as well). If there were only one offering in a product category, people would complain about that too. If there are options you don’t need…what do you care? Buy what you want.It does fit in with Apple's marketting approach, and Pro never really meant for professionals. People read too much into the Pro moniker.
Not everyone is willing to pay a premium but would buy at the right price point.
Apple, historically, has always segmented the market once a product is established. Even Jobs did, with the 4 quadrant model.
Having one device will result in compromises that make it too much for some and not enough for others.
I disagree, having a device at the top end that can run high quality games would open up Apple Arcade to a broader audience and be a good fit with Apple's push to grow services. It could also drive more development in games for Apple devices, which could benefit Mac users as well.
As for naming it, Pro may not be the best choice, but it's a good place holder differentiate the devices until a better name can be found.
People complain about Apple not offering options and being control freaks, then they complain about offering too many device options.
I find it extremely unlikely Apple will get into serious gaming anytime soon… for now i think they would target the middle ground for games… casual gamer with a few excellent exclusives or conversions.And yet, Apple’s massive success began when they started creating tiers, with iPhone 6 and 6 Plus. Later iPhone 7 Plus featured an additional camera. 2017 brought 3 new offerings. The XR sold incredibly well, and so on until we’re here today and everyone seems to want the “Pro” (and mostly “Max) models that people like to crap on because of the branding.
People complain about Apple not offering options and being control freaks, then they complain about offering too many device options.
I think it’s great that people have options in terms of feature-set and price point. And much of that variety comes from selling older models (at least with iPhone). That’s not that difficult for people to understand. Having a regular iPhone and a Pro iPhone is no different than having a regular model (or what might have been called “consumer” model in the past), and a professional model.
I can see an obvious case for a normal Apple TV and then a beefed up one intended to support console-quality games. That is 100% reasonable. Don’t game? Save money!
Maybe it will be recycled... like the FineWoven cases.Would a plastic body still fit in with their zero carbon story from last month?
They could release a FineWoven Apple TV 🤔Maybe it will be recycled... like the FineWoven cases.
It does fit in with Apple's marketting approach, and Pro never really meant for professionals.
It would be funny if they debut the M3 in the Apple TV just for the heck of it.
You mean an Apple TeleVision Pro?Why not make an Apple TV with the A16 and an Apple TV Pro with the A17Pro chip for people who want the better gaming capabilities.
It could be promoted as a cheaper alternative to a Nintendo, PlayStation or Xbox.Will probably have an A17 or lower-cost variant for ray tracing and AV1 decoding.
Come on, everyone knows that the regular Pro isnt for Pros… you need a Pro Max.C'mon now, really? The widely accepted definition for "Pro" is "Professional". Apple has obviously muddied that definition (AirPods Pro???) but "Pro never really meant for professionals" is just wrong.
An Apple TV Pro is senseless.
View attachment 2295062
View attachment 2295063
Love this product. I want a built in soundbar, A17 Pro, throw in a controller why not. Make it a console style upgrade. Give devs an easy way to port games. Id much rather play games on my Sony 65" TV than a iPhone screen. The app store right now is pitiful.