USB3 v USB 2
I absolutely hope you are right on this. Sony did try TB and back when Firewire but both kind of got lost. With HP on board, perhaps others will follow. Sadly, a key player would be the Chinese company - Lenevo. The latter having enough market share to really make a huge difference.
Btw, what's your take on the arbitration challenges with USB3 based on the USB2 long history of at times eating processing cycles? One of the things I liked about Firewire was having very little impact on the CPU.
As neither of my current Macs use USB 3, it's not something I have an intimate understanding of.
Certainly my purchase of my TB device for Aperture was based on a need to accelerate browsing on a pretty large library that I knew would swamp USB 2 and FireWire would have been capable, but a step backwards in my eyes!
I have experienced USB 2 issues previously on external drives eating clock cycles. I know through a friend, who has a Samsung laptop (Win 8) that's currently experiencing this on USB 3 and not on USB 2 on the same machine! But he reckons that it's a BIOS problem as it occurs on the sleep/wake cycle. Not something I have experienced with TB1 in OSX or Bootcamp, Win 7 though not 8.
I know we are getting off topic a little as this is nMP OP and not storage per-see. But I'll share my justification of the additional cost of TB.
I'm currently testing a Seagate GOflex pro with the interchangeable bulk standard Freegate drive (500gb) as my Aperture scratch drive and as I said earlier, it has revitalised Aperture. USB3 wasn't an option for me with my current machines.
I intend to replace the Freegate with SSD when I move to the nMP, again as a scratch drive this time for use in Bootcamp with Microstation/Autocad Civil3d/Navisworks large models. My OSX storage will be a TB2 solution and £1000 is allowed in my budget for a Raid solution.
From my early research to current USB 3 alternatives one thing was evident. If I tried a similar external scratch disc with USB 3 with a quick 840 pro SSD there would be issues currently and we know drive speeds are ramping up quickly. Samsung 840 Pro has a sequential read speed of 510 MBps and would likely be hindered by a USB 3.0 connection because real-world USB 3.0 speeds (400 MBps) are significantly lower than the theoretical 625 MBps limit set by the spec.
So not an issue on 2yr old TB1 but throttles on USB 3.0 until it's updated and we don't know when in 2014 that will be!
I know there maybe Raid USB alternatives that would sort this issue, but I was looking for a laptop bag solution to be used in conjunction with a new MBP in time as well.