Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

SR71

macrumors 68000
Jan 12, 2011
1,604
372
Boston, MA
Looking at getting the m7/256 in the coming days / weeks... depends how long I can resist. Will be used to lighten the load when on the road... Which these days is every day.
[doublepost=1461162621][/doublepost]Looking at the UK shipping times, the m7 build to order option is delivering in about a weeks time. So a little wait.
[doublepost=1461162746][/doublepost]Will be very interesting peoples impressions. I tried the 2015 1.1 and was impressed by the speed in the Apple Store. A 2016 1.3 should be flawless for the basic things i'll be doing with it. Namely everything ;)

See my post below. The m7 should end up being very, very quick for such a tiny chip.

Thinking of returning my one week old MacBook 2015 to exchange for the 2016 version. Hoping they will have it in stock at the store so that I can swap.

I say go for it. I originally thought the performance increase with Skylake wasn't actually that significant, but the Skylake core m5 benchmarks higher than the core i5 in the 2015 Air's and is almost on par with the core i7. That's pretty amazing considering the first gen benchmarked close to the 2011/2012 Air's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yashz

yashz

macrumors regular
Sep 18, 2015
235
116
USA
I say go for it. I originally thought the performance increase with Skylake wasn't actually that significant, but the Skylake core m5 benchmarks higher than the core i5 in the 2015 Air's and is almost on par with the core i7. That's pretty amazing considering the first gen benchmarked close to the 2011/2012 Air's.

Thanks for the advice!
 

yashz

macrumors regular
Sep 18, 2015
235
116
USA
I'm typing this on the new rMB

2 weeks ago exactly I bought the 2015 model, so it's perfect timing, as I was able to take it into the apple store and exchange it for the new one!

They have the new one in stock in store? Online doesn't say it's in stock anywhere..
 

Brookzy

macrumors 601
May 30, 2010
4,985
5,577
UK
Have a 256/1.3 m7 on order in Rose Gold. Should be here next week. Was at the store this morning and they had Rose Gold 512/1.2 m5 in stock. Was very hard to resist. But I would rather trade in the storage (that I don't use) for a faster machine.
 

mattopotamus

macrumors G5
Jun 12, 2012
14,744
6,130
I'm typing this on the new rMB

2 weeks ago exactly I bought the 2015 model, so it's perfect timing, as I was able to take it into the apple store and exchange it for the new one!

Are you noticing anything different performance wise?
 

joscejrod

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
May 16, 2015
512
358
See my post below. The m7 should end up being very, very quick for such a tiny chip.



I say go for it. I originally thought the performance increase with Skylake wasn't actually that significant, but the Skylake core m5 benchmarks higher than the core i5 in the 2015 Air's and is almost on par with the core i7. That's pretty amazing considering the first gen benchmarked close to the 2011/2012 Air's.

Please, could you give numbers to support this comparison? (Single-core or multi-core) Very interesting!
 

Brookzy

macrumors 601
May 30, 2010
4,985
5,577
UK
Please, could you give numbers to support this comparison? (Single-core or multi-core) Very interesting!
I just looked on Geekbench and recent results show the m5 is on par or higher than the i5 in the 2015 13" MacBook Air which is very, very impressive for a tiny passively-cooled chip.

Air:
Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 16.55.09.png


rMB:
Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 16.50.58.png


I will certainly benchmark my m7 as soon as I get it! :)
 

MacRazySwe

macrumors 65816
Aug 7, 2007
1,205
1,083
I just looked on Geekbench and recent results show the m5 is on par or higher than the i5 in the 2015 13" MacBook Air...

That's seriously impressive! Does anybody know how it compares to the late 2013 rMBP 2.4/8/256? I'm thinking they should be roughly the same.
 

viperGTS

macrumors 68000
Nov 15, 2010
1,560
941
View attachment 627732

Same as m5 on single core, probably on par with the m7 in multi-core... :eek:

I originally said I would go for the first gen since the performance gap wasn't too much between it and the newer gen, but this is actually making me consider getting a second gen over the first, especially if it's on par with any rMBP to begin with.

Though, wouldn't this suggest that the 1st gen rMB is nearly on par with these machines as well?
 

gobikerider

Suspended
Apr 15, 2016
2,022
1,478
United States
I originally said I would go for the first gen since the performance gap wasn't too much between it and the newer gen, but this is actually making me consider getting a second gen over the first, especially if it's on par with any rMBP to begin with.

Though, wouldn't this suggest that the 1st gen rMB is nearly on par with these machines as well?
Just future proof and get the new one because Skylake is a big improvement in efficiency the new MacBook gets 10 hours battery life
 
  • Like
Reactions: yashz

viperGTS

macrumors 68000
Nov 15, 2010
1,560
941
Just future proof and get the new one because Skylake is a big improvement in efficiency the new MacBook gets 10 hours battery life

I'm deciding between a refurbished 1st gen 1.2/8/512 for $1189, or a base second gen for $1299. Is it worth losing half the storage and paying $110 more for the other improvements? Are they significant enough that it's even valid to consider this "future proofing"?
 

gobikerider

Suspended
Apr 15, 2016
2,022
1,478
United States
I'm deciding between a refurbished 1st gen 1.2/8/512 for $1189, or a base second gen for $1299. Is it worth losing half the storage and paying $110 more for the other improvements? Are they significant enough that it's even valid to consider this "future proofing"?
For me yes because I have little need for storage 128gb is a sweet spot. As far as other improvements I'd say definitely worth it, faster cpu, gpu, all with a extra hour battery life, I'd say spend a little extra because in my book that is what matters most .storage is largely irrelevant unless you actually need it , but if it's a comfort thing don't let it worry you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: viperGTS

viperGTS

macrumors 68000
Nov 15, 2010
1,560
941
For me yes because I have little need for storage 128gb is a sweet spot. As far as other improvements I'd say definitely worth it, faster cpu, gpu, all with a extra hour battery life, I'd say spend a little extra because in my book that is what matters most .storage is largely irrelevant unless you actually need it , but if it's a comfort thing don't let it worry you.

Hmm... well, you definitely have me reconsidering! I'm currently on a 2012 non-Retina MBP with 500GB, but I only have about 100GB left. I think most of my files are junk though, so I'll definitely do some cleaning if I decide that I go for the newer model.
[doublepost=1461175010][/doublepost]
1st gen to 2nd gen rMB is about a 20-25% improvement in Geekbench scores, but the efficiency improvements may be more significant.
I definitely need to check out the benchmarks once they start coming out. If the improvements are significant enough, I might go for the newer one. We'll see!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.