Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rodedwards

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2010
208
69
Hi everyone ...

I'd like some advice on upgrading my 2009 classic 4,1 Mac Pro please (firmware updated to v5,1).

As you can see from system profile report, I have already upgraded processors, ram and hard drive to Samsung 840 EVO 1TB 2.5-inch Basic SATA Solid State Drive connected via PCIe. I also just upgraded the graphics card to an AMD Radeon RX580 Sapphire Pulse with full Mac EFI support. These cards are now sold refurbished by https://www.macstoreuk.com/product/amd-radeon-rx580-8gb-with-mac-efi/ and allow Mac Boot screen.

I think the bottleneck is the six year old Samsung Evo 840 SSD. So i'm seriously considering upgrading the Samsung 840 Evo hard drive as it only reads / writes at under 500Mb/s.

Is it easy to fit a 1Tb Samsung 970 NVMe SSD (1,500Mb/s) that will also be bootable or am i better with a standard and newer 2.5" SSD?

Any advantages upgrading ram to 64Gb too - I'm mainly using Photoshop and FCPX to edit 8k video.

Any advice on this would be much appreciated ...

 

Attachments

  • System.jpg
    System.jpg
    73.7 KB · Views: 324
  • Disk-Speed.jpg
    Disk-Speed.jpg
    57.7 KB · Views: 269

theunderseaclub

macrumors newbie
May 22, 2008
29
6
Big thanks Orph ... although I'm not much of a tech head and didn't fully understand it ...

So using those 'blade' sdd's - i'm at risk of no boot screen etc? Is that why a standard SSD is more easily compatible?

No boot screen has to do with using a non Mac EFI graphics card, if you use a GPU that wasn't sold by Apple or came with your MP, then it won't have a boot screen during start up, unless you flashed the GPU with Mac EFI yourself with a Windows computer.

Keep it mind that you need to have Mojave installed with a certain bootrom to get a bootable nvme.

I just upgraded my 4.1 flashed 5.1 Mac Pro to Mojave with a 1tb Crucial P1 NVME SSD bootable (with the Lycom nvme pcie adapter), and also a Metal supported Sapphire RX580 GPU.

I used the following 3 guides to upgrade my 4.1 flashed 5.1 to Mojave, upgrade to the RX580 GPU, and use NVME SSD:

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-mojave-bootrom-upgrade-instructions.2142418/

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/blade-ssds-nvme-ahci.2146725/

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/gpu-compatibility-list-for-cmp.2174600/
 
  • Like
Reactions: rodedwards

fatespawn

macrumors regular
Feb 22, 2009
238
110
Chicagoish
Is it easy to fit a 1Tb Samsung 970 NVMe SSD (1,500Mb/s) that will also be bootable or am i better with a standard and newer 2.5" SSD?

Any advantages upgrading ram to 64Gb too - I'm mainly using Photoshop and FCPX to edit 8k video.

See my signature for my NVMe setup. Kryo M.2 PCIe adapter with a Samsung 970Pro. There are other options, but this is the one I chose. 1500/1500 read write (very close).

You can upgrade to 64GB Ram if you want, but it'll be slower than 48GB of ram because the Mac Pro uses triple channel memory. But if you DO need the extra ram, it's better to fill all 4 slots because 4 slower ram sticks with adequate capacity is better than 3 faster ram sticks with not enough memory for what you're doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rodedwards

rodedwards

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2010
208
69
Thanks to you all for your help so far ... I'm not super tech savvy ... so trying hard to keep up. :)

From what i can see ... the graphics card metal support Mojave firmware requirement shouldn't be a problem ... However, does my Samsung Evo 1Tb SSD main boot drive (that's connected via PCIe port) need to be replaced with a standard SATA drive for the firmware and Mojave upgrade?

Also ... It looks like a Samsung 970 Evo blade will work and increase my read write speed when fitted properly ... but do i need a special adapter to fit this to the PCIe port (in place of old Samsung 840 Evo SSD) ?

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B07CGJNLBB/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&psc=1

Am i also right in thinking that a special PCIe adapter with two switches will give me up to 3000Mb/s read write speeds? Or is my old Mac Pro throttled back to 1500Mb/s?

Big thanks again in advance !
 

lowendlinux

macrumors 603
Sep 24, 2014
5,455
6,773
Germany
I don't want to sounds like an a$$ but did you even look at all the stuck wiki posts above here..

Everything you've asked is addressed in at least one of those wiki posts along with reviews and benchmarks
 

rodedwards

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2010
208
69
I don't want to sounds like an a$$ but did you even look at all the stuck wiki posts above here..

Everything you've asked is addressed in at least one of those wiki posts along with reviews and benchmarks

As i said in last my comment (perhaps you missed it) ... I'm not very tech savvy ... so having looked at all of those posts I'm still a little confused. That's why i am asking for clarification ...

I was hoping for some helpful and friendly comments as I'm still learning ...
 

Manzana

macrumors 6502a
Jul 19, 2004
612
13
Orange County, CA
Your best option is to get a NVMe PCIe m.2 SSD along with a PCIe adapter card. Keep in mind you will get at most 1,500 Mbps. Also, use at least some type of passive cooling like a heat sink.

Your system will recognize this setup, however you will need to install Mojave onto it to use as boot drive.

If you are looking to double the speed of this drive and you have north of 200 quid then you could get a card with a fancy switch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rodedwards

jscipione

macrumors 6502
Mar 27, 2017
429
242
Imma need a geekbench 4 on that box.

Assuming 32gb RAM via 4x8gb I'd say get 2 more 8gb sticks for a total of 48gb in triple channel mode for Photoshop.

Get a PCIe SSD adapter and get a cheap NVMe SSD. You could get a 970 Pro but also many cheaper brands will work just as well on pcie v2. You can instead get non-nvme SM951s on the used market which are plenty fast and will work on HIGH Sierra. Any of the above should benchmark around 1,500MB/s read and write.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rodedwards

rodedwards

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2010
208
69
Thanks everyone ... I really appreciate your advice as I don't want to buy the wrong kit ...

I think I'm going to go for this Aqua Computer kryo3M.2 evo PCIe 3.0 x 4, adapter for M.2 NGFF PCIe SSD, M-Key with passive cooler:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/Bew0742LW4WB/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&psc=1

I've got High Sierra backed up on Time Machine, so i'll install new hardware, remove old Samsung 840 Evo from the PCIe slot and then reinstall High Sierra from the back up on to the new blade drive. I can see if all is hunky dory before i then upgrade to Mojave.

Is there any advantage to installing the blade SSD into the first PCIe slot on my Mac Pro as i think i read the first two slots are fastest?
[doublepost=1565328227][/doublepost]
Imma need a geekbench 4 on that box.

Assuming 32gb RAM via 4x8gb I'd say get 2 more 8gb sticks for a total of 48gb in triple channel mode for Photoshop.

Get a PCIe SSD adapter and get a cheap NVMe SSD. You could get a 970 Pro but also many cheaper brands will work just as well on pcie v2. You can instead get non-nvme SM951s on the used market which are plenty fast and will work on HIGH Sierra. Any of the above should benchmark around 1,500MB/s read and write.

Big thanks - I may even treat myself to some new ram !
 

jbarley

macrumors 601
Jul 1, 2006
4,023
1,895
Vancouver Island
your adapter and blade combo will give the same results (approx 1500MB/s read/write) in any of the 4 available PCIe slots.
This is a limitation of the adapter not the computer.
You can achieve faster results in slots 1 or 2 but it requires a special and more expensive adapter card.
 

rodedwards

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2010
208
69
your adapter and blade combo will give the same results (approx 1500MB/s read/write) in any of the 4 available PCIe slots.
This is a limitation of the adapter not the computer.
You can achieve faster results in slots 1 or 2 but it requires a special and more expensive adapter card.

Thanks jbarley ! I'll fit it in the top PCIe slot where there is a space.

I've just upgraded to Mojave 10.14.6 with firmwares and Boot Rom 144.0.0.0.0 too ... slowly getting there ! :)
 

rodedwards

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2010
208
69
See my signature for my NVMe setup. Kryo M.2 PCIe adapter with a Samsung 970Pro. There are other options, but this is the one I chose. 1500/1500 read write (very close).

You can upgrade to 64GB Ram if you want, but it'll be slower than 48GB of ram because the Mac Pro uses triple channel memory. But if you DO need the extra ram, it's better to fill all 4 slots because 4 slower ram sticks with adequate capacity is better than 3 faster ram sticks with not enough memory for what you're doing.

May i ask your advice on ram please ... as i don't quite understand ... as i said, i'm no tech head.

I currently have 32Gb ram installed 1333ghz DDR3 - 4Gb x 8 slots.

I did buy an upgrade to 64Gb a few weeks ago (before your advice) and it ran much slower so i returned it for refund. If i now try and upgrade to 48Gb ram as you suggest, will that be much faster than the 32Gb or do i really need to go to 96Gb? I have eight ram slots ... what's your advice please ?! Thanks again in advance ...
 

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,370
13,532
May i ask your advice on ram please ... as i don't quite understand ... as i said, i'm no tech head.

I currently have 32Gb ram installed 1333ghz DDR3 - 4Gb x 8 slots.

I did buy an upgrade to 64Gb a few weeks ago (before your advice) and it ran much slower so i returned it for refund. If i now try and upgrade to 48Gb ram as you suggest, will that be much faster than the 32Gb or do i really need to go to 96Gb? I have eight ram slots ... what's your advice please ?! Thanks again in advance ...
6 x 8GB ECC 1333MHz or 6 x 16GB ECC 1333MHz are the optimum configuration for a dual CPU Mac Pro, Nehalem/Westemere Xeons are tri-channel.

If you use 8 DIMMs you have a penalty since the 3rd and 4th memory slots of each Xeon share a channel and only when you need more RAM than faster RAM you use 8 DIMMs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rodedwards

rodedwards

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2010
208
69
6 x 8GB ECC 1333MHz or 6 x 16GB ECC 1333MHz are the optimum configuration for a dual CPU Mac Pro, Nehalem/Westemere Xeons are tri-channel.

If you use 8 DIMMs you have a penalty since the 3rd and 4th memory slots of each Xeon share a channel and only when you need more RAM than faster RAM you use 8 DIMMs.

Fabulous tsialex- thanks so much ...

Will i notice much difference upgrading to 48gb from 32Gb (8 x 4Gb) or do i need to go to 96Gb?

Do i fit the chips in slot 1,2,3 and 5,6,7 for max performance?
 

rodedwards

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2010
208
69
I largely use Photoshop (big files) and FCPX again big files 8k 360 video.

I was going to use my new EVO 970 m.2 as a scratch disk for PS ... but not sure if it's as fast as more ram. Also, from what i understood, FCPX doesn't use much more ram than 8Gb - unlike Adobe Premiere. That's why i upgraded to RX580 GPU and the m.2.

What do you think please? Big thanks again ! :)
 

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,370
13,532
I largely use Photoshop (big files) and FCPX again big files 8k 360 video.

I was going to use my new EVO 970 m.2 as a scratch disk for PS ... but not sure if it's as fast as more ram. Also, from what i understood, FCPX doesn't use much more ram than 8Gb - unlike Adobe Premiere. That's why i upgraded to RX580 GPU and the m.2.

What do you think please? Big thanks again ! :)
eBay server pulls are so cheap nowadays that you can buy 96GB (6 x 16GB ECC 1333MHz) and use it as cache/RAMDISK/etc, go for it since it's the best compromise of RAM size versus RAM throughput.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macoda

rodedwards

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2010
208
69
What's a server pull ?! Is it a ram chip? Sorry to sound studid ! :D
eBay server pulls are so cheap nowadays that you can buy 96GB (6 x 16GB ECC 1333MHz) and use it as cache/RAMDISK/etc, go for it since it's the best compromise of RAM size versus RAM throughput.

What's a server pull - is it a ram chip set? Sorry - i'm a bit wet behind the ears ! :)
 

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,370
13,532
What's a server pull ?! Is it a ram chip? Sorry to sound studid ! :D


What's a server pull - is it a ram chip set? Sorry - i'm a bit wet behind the ears ! :)
Server pulls are used ECC RAM that come from servers that are decommissioned, most people here buy server pulls on eBay/AliExpress.
 

rodedwards

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2010
208
69
Cool ... thanks for explaining ! I'll look into it all ... really appreciate your advice. :)
 

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,370
13,532
  • Like
Reactions: rodedwards

mattspace

macrumors 68040
Jun 5, 2013
3,299
2,944
Australia
I did buy an upgrade to 64Gb a few weeks ago (before your advice) and it ran much slower so i returned it for refund. If i now try and upgrade to 48Gb ram as you suggest, will that be much faster than the 32Gb or do i really need to go to 96Gb? I have eight ram slots ... what's your advice please ?! Thanks again in advance ...

Just for some fun perspective on how affordable RAM upgrades for 4,1 / 5,1 systems are now... in 2015 I bought 3x 16gb 1333 sticks from Data Memory Systems - it cost me US$537 before shipping. Last month, I bought 3 more from the same company to bring my system up to 96gb, only US$107 before shipping.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.