Finally gave up as the estimated time remaining was 8hrs
And here's me thinking i had a pro machine
Processor 2 x 2.4 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
Memory 26 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC
Graphics ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB
Software Mac OS X Lion 10.7.5 (11G63)
This is a CUDA test and your using an AMD which doesn't have CUDA, kind of to be expected that it would return such results.
I wonder what a Titan or 780 does on this
This is a CUDA test and your using an AMD which doesn't have CUDA, kind of to be expected that it would return such results.
I wonder what a Titan or 780 does on this
Makes sense, any recommendations to swap the card out?
Who needs a Titan… ;-)
Mac Pro 3,1
2x 3,2GHz
EVGA GTX 580 SC
5 Min 50 Sec
I do. In fact, I need 8 Titans for Octane Render and Cinema 4d. Here's the sample project AE performance of one of them - 3 min 43 seconds.
That is just awesome. Was that per frame?
There are 151 frames. 3 x 60 secs = 180 secs; + 43 secs = 223 secs; 223 / 151 = ~ 1.47 secs per frame.
Simple scene? That seems insane.
If by simple. you mean one that it took under 1/5 of the time it took a system with 2 x 8 core xeon e5 @ 3.3ghz and a Quadro 4000 (17 min. 24 secs) to render.
That isn't what I meant. I meant a lighter scene in terms of geometry and material complexity. Even 17 min. 24 secs isn't much time for that number of frames.
Mac Pro 4,1
2x3.33GHZ
32GB RAM
EVGA Nvidia 570 2.5GB
6min 32sec
Swapped out the 570 with a EVGA GTX580 3GB Classified Ultra and got the following results with the same specs minus the card and a flash to 5,1:
5min 10sec
With both 570 and 580 installed:
5min 2 sec
GTX570/580 still rule.