Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

James_C

macrumors 68030
Sep 13, 2002
2,847
1,897
Bristol, UK
MacOS is still MacOS. It's not iOS. Things are allowed to run in the background and use resources. The CPU architecture doesn't change the way RAM is utilized. You're not going to magically get the benefits of 16GB of RAM with 8GB just because it's not x86. There also seems to be some misunderstanding about what the unified memory architecture does and how it works which may be where some of these outrageous claims are coming from.

Quoting John Gruber from Daring Fireball

"for most tasks for most people, these M1 Macs need less RAM to perform equivalently to, if not better than, their Intel-based counterparts. This sounds like ******** but it’s not. It’s the result of a hardware system architecture whose design aligns with Apple’s software architecture."

Link

 
  • Like
Reactions: Sanpete

djlythium

macrumors 65816
Jun 11, 2014
1,170
1,619
I am vacillating between Air vs. MBP M1s to replace a 16" MBP. 6 months ago it was a no-brainer, MBP all the way. Now??
With the education discount, the cost differential between the 8/512 Air and the 8/256 MBP was about $50. For my usage, 8gb is fine, and my last MBP only used ~70gb of the 256 SSD (and that's without trying save space by *not* loading anything on it), so, 256 is again fine for my needs. So, for $50 more, I got a larger trackpad, fan to prevent thermal throttling (which can happen on the Air, though it's, admittedly, minimal), the Touch Bar (for better or worse), and better battery life. Pretty good deal IMO for only $50 more.

Hope this is helpful!
 
  • Like
Reactions: torncanvas

dboris

macrumors member
Jan 10, 2017
56
39
But you loose 256gb which is valued at 200$, so it's in reality 250$ as you could have got the air 256 8gb for less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: djlythium

dmccloud

macrumors 68040
Sep 7, 2009
3,142
1,899
Anchorage, AK
MacOS is still MacOS. It's not iOS. Things are allowed to run in the background and use resources. The CPU architecture doesn't change the way RAM is utilized. You're not going to magically get the benefits of 16GB of RAM with 8GB just because it's not x86. There also seems to be some misunderstanding about what the unified memory architecture does and how it works which may be where some of these outrageous claims are coming from.

Yet we have already seen individuals such as John Gruber (who knows more about the Mac then most online journalists) state that because of the way UMA works on the M1, it is possible for apps to use less RAM than they do on Intel-based Macs. When you see the base MBA with the M1 (late 2020) handling 94 tracks in Logic Pro with ease and the Intel-based (early 2020) Air choking on anything over 9 tracks, there are clearly significant differences in how the two systems handle both applications and RAM. The problem with your position is that your justifications are entirely based upon how x86 systems handle memory management, which is not something Apple even cares about with their SoCs, since they have nothing to do with x86 standards. AMDs push to introduce their Infinity Fabric setup is the approach rooted in x86 architecture, not Apple's M1 architecture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cooltony

jharvey71884

macrumors 6502
May 3, 2011
300
27
Trying to Decide this very thing myself. FCP editor. But my projects can get sort of long. In the 30 to 45 minute range. So I’m thinking the extra power of the pro, despite it being small might be very helpful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vddobrev

jerryk

macrumors 604
Nov 3, 2011
7,421
4,208
SF Bay Area
With the education discount, the cost differential between the 8/512 Air and the 8/256 MBP was about $50. For my usage, 8gb is fine, and my last MBP only used ~70gb of the 256 SSD (and that's without trying save space by *not* loading anything on it), so, 256 is again fine for my needs. So, for $50 more, I got a larger trackpad, fan to prevent thermal throttling (which can happen on the Air, though it's, admittedly, minimal), the Touch Bar (for better or worse), and better battery life. Pretty good deal IMO for only $50 more.

Hope this is helpful!
I would rather have more drive space. Also, the new Air has a much larger thermal passive cooler compared to its Intel-based predecessor. This gives it a lot more mass to heat up before it has to throttle to keep temps in line.

This video does a pretty in-depth comparison. 8 minutes in they test thermal throttling. 14 min has the conclusion.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: djlythium

djlythium

macrumors 65816
Jun 11, 2014
1,170
1,619
I would rather have more drive space. Also, the new Air has a much larger thermal passive cooler compared to its Intel-based predecessor. This gives it a lot more mass to heat up before it has to throttle to keep temps in line.

This video does a pretty in-depth comparison. 8 minutes in they test thermal throttling.

Yeah, actually that video was to what I was implicitly referring when I said throttling, if any, is minimal. ? That’s a pretty good channel, IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jerryk

labyrinth153

macrumors regular
Jul 16, 2017
110
74
Pittsburgh, PA
There's been no real world difference shown between the 8 and 16 GB models of the same line.

You're preaching theory when we want actionable evidence, which you fail to provide.
Not an expert but I do know a thing or two.

So, there are actually differences between cpu arches when it comes to memory. Notably 64-bit uses distinctly more ram than 32bit code (swollen pointers?) on x86. Now this doesn't mean that arm64 uses less ram, but it most certainly CAN use less ram for the same code.

Now. The issue is, it isn't going to be 8gb less ram. Sorry. You still need a similar amount of ram for similar workloads, especially where the majority of ram is data and not program code.

Why this isn't a problem potentially?

Because the M1 has very fast ram, and a fast SSD. You might not even notice when you are running with 8gb of data swapped out or compressed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: torncanvas

djlythium

macrumors 65816
Jun 11, 2014
1,170
1,619
But you loose 256gb which is valued at 200$, so it's in reality 250$ as you could have got the air 256 8gb for less.
But the 256 MBA has the crippled GPU, not to mention the Pro features it lacks. I think I see what you’re trying to say, though.
 

vddobrev

macrumors 6502a
Oct 28, 2016
962
833
Haskovo, Bulgaria
Currently running a 2015 MBP 15” with quad 2.5 i7 and 2GB Video Card. I film most of my professional work in 10-bit H265 420 Log (From X-T3/4). I want so desparately to be able to actually play back H265 video in real time and make edits without stuttering. After seeing some reviews of the new M1 macs playing Canon H265 footage like butter, I reached for my credit card.

I ordered a MacBook Pro 13” with 16GB of RAM and 512 HD. And got my 3 week delivery window. Then I watched more reviews and comparisons and started realizing that 8GB of RAM would actually be enough and that the difference between a MPB and Air was really small... and since this is just supposed to be a stop-gap computer for the next year or two to make my editing more enjoyable, I decided to save $4-500 and order an Air with 8GB RAM and 512 HD (with the 8 core GPU) AND I can pick it up locally on Tuesday.

That all seems logical, right?
If $400-500 is a concern - then this is logical. Otherwise - no, not for your type of work. I would go for the Pro with 16GB and 512SSD.

Think about it this way - how long does it take you to earn $400-500, and if you save them now on buying a lesser machine, will you not regret it, and end up re-buying?
 

acidfast7_redux

Suspended
Nov 10, 2020
567
521
uk
Seriously? That's your argument? "They look different in a video."

I think we operate in different circles.

In case anyone cares because visual evidence doesn‘t suffice, here are the trackpad dimensions. Whether it’s material depends on your use case.

MBP 5.3“ x 3.3” = 17.49 sq in
MBA 4.8” x 3.2” = 15.36 sq in
Thank you for supplying numbers to facilitate discussion.

Could you let me know the source as I looked through the Apple website and couldn't locate them myself, hence my initial response.

I'd like to know where I missed them, so that I could better look in the future and supply this data on my own.

Have a Monday.
 
Last edited:

djlythium

macrumors 65816
Jun 11, 2014
1,170
1,619
Crippled GPU? Come on.. there's essentially no difference in the real world. ?
? I know, that’s was a bit hyperbolic, but I can’t get past how the 8/7 < 8/8. I mean, it’s got a disabled core because it’s not good enough. ??‍♂️ IMO, 8/7 is like ‘you were soooooo close!’
 

mkitchen

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jul 7, 2008
109
56
If $400-500 is a concern - then this is logical. Otherwise - no, not for your type of work. I would go for the Pro with 16GB and 512SSD.

Think about it this way - how long does it take you to earn $400-500, and if you save them now on buying a lesser machine, will you not regret it, and end up re-buying?

Your point is taken... but I view these machines as a stop gap for the next year or two until they bring out a real “pro” device that has more than two ports. There is almost no difference in the performance between the two other than minor throttling in some specific situations.

I am no longer worrying about MPB vs AIR... they are almost the exact same performance and machine... I’ll happily save the money there...

I am wonduring if I made a mistake on RAM (8 over 16) though. I have some typical client work I am doing right now, so I will test it out on the AIR when I get it in two days. I will grab some wedding footage and put together a worst case scenario to test out and then make a decision. I have a return policy until January 9th, so that will be enough time to figure it out and return it if I need to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: James_C
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.