Also a larger touchpad. Not that it’s a major differentiator, but it is a difference.The MBA is cannibalizing the MBP offering this year. The 2 extra hours of battery, 100 extra nits, and Touch Bar don't justify the $250/$300 difference.
Also a larger touchpad. Not that it’s a major differentiator, but it is a difference.The MBA is cannibalizing the MBP offering this year. The 2 extra hours of battery, 100 extra nits, and Touch Bar don't justify the $250/$300 difference.
Those are cons, with the exception of more nits. Everything else changes the form factor.Also a larger touchpad. Not that it’s a major differentiator, but it is a difference.
A larger touchpad is a con? Ok.Those are cons, with the exception of more nits. Everything else changes the form factor.
Yes, as the machine itself is larger.A larger touchpad is a con? Ok.
Width and depth are exactly the same. Maximum thickness is higher on the MBA. Average thickness is higher on the MBP.Yes, as the machine itself is larger.
MacOS is still MacOS. It's not iOS. Things are allowed to run in the background and use resources. The CPU architecture doesn't change the way RAM is utilized. You're not going to magically get the benefits of 16GB of RAM with 8GB just because it's not x86. There also seems to be some misunderstanding about what the unified memory architecture does and how it works which may be where some of these outrageous claims are coming from.
Like I said, the MBA is smaller. What is the mm2 difference in touchpad between the models?Width and depth are exactly the same. Maximum thickness is higher on the MBA. Average thickness is higher on the MBP.
Not huge, but noticeable when you see them side by side. The M1 review video in post #8 shows the difference.Like I said, the MBA is smaller. What is the mm2 difference in touchpad between the models?
Seriously? That's your argument? "They look different in a video."Not huge, but noticeable when you see them side by side. The M1 review video shows the difference.
I’m sorry, I guess we do. Enjoy your evening as further dialog is pointless.Seriously? That's your argument? They look different in a video.
I think we operate in different circles.
With the education discount, the cost differential between the 8/512 Air and the 8/256 MBP was about $50. For my usage, 8gb is fine, and my last MBP only used ~70gb of the 256 SSD (and that's without trying save space by *not* loading anything on it), so, 256 is again fine for my needs. So, for $50 more, I got a larger trackpad, fan to prevent thermal throttling (which can happen on the Air, though it's, admittedly, minimal), the Touch Bar (for better or worse), and better battery life. Pretty good deal IMO for only $50 more.I am vacillating between Air vs. MBP M1s to replace a 16" MBP. 6 months ago it was a no-brainer, MBP all the way. Now??
MacOS is still MacOS. It's not iOS. Things are allowed to run in the background and use resources. The CPU architecture doesn't change the way RAM is utilized. You're not going to magically get the benefits of 16GB of RAM with 8GB just because it's not x86. There also seems to be some misunderstanding about what the unified memory architecture does and how it works which may be where some of these outrageous claims are coming from.
I would rather have more drive space. Also, the new Air has a much larger thermal passive cooler compared to its Intel-based predecessor. This gives it a lot more mass to heat up before it has to throttle to keep temps in line.With the education discount, the cost differential between the 8/512 Air and the 8/256 MBP was about $50. For my usage, 8gb is fine, and my last MBP only used ~70gb of the 256 SSD (and that's without trying save space by *not* loading anything on it), so, 256 is again fine for my needs. So, for $50 more, I got a larger trackpad, fan to prevent thermal throttling (which can happen on the Air, though it's, admittedly, minimal), the Touch Bar (for better or worse), and better battery life. Pretty good deal IMO for only $50 more.
Hope this is helpful!
Yeah, actually that video was to what I was implicitly referring when I said throttling, if any, is minimal. ? That’s a pretty good channel, IMO.I would rather have more drive space. Also, the new Air has a much larger thermal passive cooler compared to its Intel-based predecessor. This gives it a lot more mass to heat up before it has to throttle to keep temps in line.
This video does a pretty in-depth comparison. 8 minutes in they test thermal throttling.
Not an expert but I do know a thing or two.There's been no real world difference shown between the 8 and 16 GB models of the same line.
You're preaching theory when we want actionable evidence, which you fail to provide.
But the 256 MBA has the crippled GPU, not to mention the Pro features it lacks. I think I see what you’re trying to say, though.But you loose 256gb which is valued at 200$, so it's in reality 250$ as you could have got the air 256 8gb for less.
If $400-500 is a concern - then this is logical. Otherwise - no, not for your type of work. I would go for the Pro with 16GB and 512SSD.Currently running a 2015 MBP 15” with quad 2.5 i7 and 2GB Video Card. I film most of my professional work in 10-bit H265 420 Log (From X-T3/4). I want so desparately to be able to actually play back H265 video in real time and make edits without stuttering. After seeing some reviews of the new M1 macs playing Canon H265 footage like butter, I reached for my credit card.
I ordered a MacBook Pro 13” with 16GB of RAM and 512 HD. And got my 3 week delivery window. Then I watched more reviews and comparisons and started realizing that 8GB of RAM would actually be enough and that the difference between a MPB and Air was really small... and since this is just supposed to be a stop-gap computer for the next year or two to make my editing more enjoyable, I decided to save $4-500 and order an Air with 8GB RAM and 512 HD (with the 8 core GPU) AND I can pick it up locally on Tuesday.
That all seems logical, right?
Crippled GPU? Come on.. there's essentially no difference in the real world. ?But the 256 MBA has the crippled GPU, not to mention the Pro features it lacks. I think I see what you’re trying to say, though.
Seriously? That's your argument? "They look different in a video."
I think we operate in different circles.
Thank you for supplying numbers to facilitate discussion.In case anyone cares because visual evidence doesn‘t suffice, here are the trackpad dimensions. Whether it’s material depends on your use case.
MBP 5.3“ x 3.3” = 17.49 sq in
MBA 4.8” x 3.2” = 15.36 sq in
? I know, that’s was a bit hyperbolic, but I can’t get past how the 8/7 < 8/8. I mean, it’s got a disabled core because it’s not good enough. ??♂️ IMO, 8/7 is like ‘you were soooooo close!’Crippled GPU? Come on.. there's essentially no difference in the real world. ?
If $400-500 is a concern - then this is logical. Otherwise - no, not for your type of work. I would go for the Pro with 16GB and 512SSD.
Think about it this way - how long does it take you to earn $400-500, and if you save them now on buying a lesser machine, will you not regret it, and end up re-buying?