An article on WCCFTech got me thinking about Vega 11. It seems not much is known about this GPU but lets make some educated guesses. Vega 10 is going to be ~12 TFLOPS with a size of >500mm2. This makes it a GP102 competitor and consumes > 225 W.
If Apple is going to update the mac pro and keep roughly the same form factor, this GPU may be too big to fit. Remember that when the 2013 mac pro shipped hawaii had been released but apple still chose to use the smaller, cooler Tahiti instead of it.
The chip we as mac pro enthusiasts may be more interested in is Vega 11. There is a giant gap in die size between Polaris 10 (220 mm2) and Vega 10 (>500 mm2). Lets plop Vega 11 somewhere in there (say a Tahiti like 350mm2) and we are looking at something like a 8-9 TFLOP chip at 150-200W to compete with GP104. This sounds like the perfect chip for a mac pro. Throw two of these in there and you are looking at 16-18 TFLOPS of combined compute power.
Since the rumors have both Vega 10 and 11 landing in May, lets hope WWDC brings us some new desktop hardware.
If Apple is going to update the mac pro and keep roughly the same form factor, this GPU may be too big to fit. Remember that when the 2013 mac pro shipped hawaii had been released but apple still chose to use the smaller, cooler Tahiti instead of it.
The chip we as mac pro enthusiasts may be more interested in is Vega 11. There is a giant gap in die size between Polaris 10 (220 mm2) and Vega 10 (>500 mm2). Lets plop Vega 11 somewhere in there (say a Tahiti like 350mm2) and we are looking at something like a 8-9 TFLOP chip at 150-200W to compete with GP104. This sounds like the perfect chip for a mac pro. Throw two of these in there and you are looking at 16-18 TFLOPS of combined compute power.
Since the rumors have both Vega 10 and 11 landing in May, lets hope WWDC brings us some new desktop hardware.