Absolutely! Like you said, contrary to popular belief, those people who cycle their devices quite a lot and quite quickly have amazing health-to-cycles ratios.
Time also degrades batteries, so an iPad that’s almost a decade old may not have a great ratio simply due to age, but that doesn’t mean that the ratio is bad.
@Etienooo has a great example. I’ve always stated that I’d love to use an iPad enough so as to see whether I can get to 1000 cycles with 80% health, and if you use it enough, you can.
You know, it’s interesting. Time is extremely important. I have a 9.7-inch iPad Pro. I’m not a heavy user, I’m an efficient one, so even though it was forcibly updated to iOS 12, I still get 10-11 hours. As a result, I have around 760 cycles with 84% health in a bit over 7.5 years. Decent for the timeframe, but not amazing.
A family member has a 6th-gen iPad, also on iOS 12. Battery life is a little better than mine simply because it’s closer to the original iOS version, but they’re a significantly heavier user than me. Therefore, they cycle it more quickly. That iPad is at 690 cycles after 4.5 years. Battery health is at 92%.
I have the most extreme example: my 2015 MacBook Pro. Also a bit over 7.5-years-old. Barely used, spent most of its time turned off. 113 cycles, 93% health.
So, again, like you said, contrary to popular belief, the more you use a device, the better its battery health is.
Battery health is, in my honest opinion, only relevant to discuss in terms of cycles. Age disrupts this. The more you use a device in as short of a timeframe as possible, the better its battery health, interestingly.
So, like I always say: avoid heat, charge as slowly as possible. All the rest is irrelevant for battery conservation if you use a device regularly.