It still puzzles me why they kept the chin but not the logo. They even squeezed one onto front of the Pro Cinema Display. Imagine a Porsche or even a BMW without a front badge. Yikes. 
It is puzzling, but possibly someone thought it wasn’t necessary and was able to convince others of it. But it’s equally possible down the road feedback could convince them to put the logo back at some point. In that event these first M1 iMacs could become collector items simply because they don’t have the logo on the front.It still puzzles me why they kept the chin but not the logo. They even squeezed one onto front of the Pro Cinema Display. Imagine a Porsche or even a BMW without a front badge. Yikes.![]()
The current iMac is the most recent evolutionary step of a design that began with the third generation iMac. It‘s as if Apple had been searching for an optimal form that could become immediately recognizable and associated with them without a word. It is their thing, at least presently, and all the whining over it will not change anything.
Yes, the trend is to deemphasize names and logos, and rely on (sometimes exaggerated) design elements to convey the brand.The new Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport don’t say Ford anywhere on the vehicle except a small badge tucked discreetly on the tail end, much like Apple retaining their logo on the back of the new iMac. The Bronco, much like Mustang, the Jeep Wrangler, the Volkswagen Beetle and Porsche 911, is near universally recognizable without any badging.
First thing that came to mind after this…
I agree and such a dumb, generic move by Apple. Looking at the front, if you never this iMac before, you would not even know it was an Apple iMac.It still puzzles me why they kept the chin but not the logo. They even squeezed one onto front of the Pro Cinema Display. Imagine a Porsche or even a BMW without a front badge. Yikes.![]()
It still puzzles me why they kept the chin but not the logo. They even squeezed one onto front of the Pro Cinema Display. Imagine a Porsche or even a BMW without a front badge. Yikes.![]()
Very strange move and I didn't like it at all!I agree and such a dumb, generic move by Apple. Looking at the front, if you never this iMac before, you would not even know it was an Apple iMac.
Me too! I was like, it’s Thanos’ grand-pappy!First thing that came to mind after this…
View attachment 1825039
As was stated above it’s not hard to see the reasoning behind it. While pretty much all AIO desktops will look alike to those who don’t follow the industry (much like cars and trucks) to those who are tuned in the iMac design is pretty much immediately identifiable even without a logo. Hence the still existent chin in particular.I agree and such a dumb, generic move by Apple. Looking at the front, if you never this iMac before, you would not even know it was an Apple iMac.
Yeah, because that minimalist design just shouts out “Packard Bell” and doesn’t look like anything that Jony Ive ever had a hand in. </sarcasm> Seriously, though, Apple probably did market research and I’d expect a blind “what brand do you think this is” would be the first thing they’d ask.Looking at the front, if you never this iMac before, you would not even know it was an Apple iMac.
I believe it comes with a selection of Apple stickers - knock yourself out.Yes, I would prefer having the logo, but it’s not a deal breaker.
Omg I know right? Just give everyone the same ports and Ethernet. That’s such basic things a desktop needs and the base model is expensive enough.Yeah, because that minimalist design just shouts out “Packard Bell” and doesn’t look like anything that Jony Ive ever had a hand in. </sarcasm> Seriously, though, Apple probably did market research and I’d expect a blind “what brand do you think this is” would be the first thing they’d ask.
I don’t personally like the design but I don’t think I’d mistake it for anything but an iMac.
I believe it comes with a selection of Apple stickers - knock yourself out.
Seriously, I’m more worried about the external, proprietary, captive cable charging brick, the “sounds like a good idea until you actually think about it for 10 seconds” Ethernet port and the ridiculous port rationing on the lower-end model (I can’t believe that the cost saving of omitting 2 measly USB-C ports justifies the logistics of having two different chassis models - although all might become clear when the M1X comes around). Main worry is that those things might show up in the 5k replacement.
It's not that the empty chin makes it look like it's from a different brand, it just looks like a knock off, and I don't think stickers would do much to help thatYeah, because that minimalist design just shouts out “Packard Bell” and doesn’t look like anything that Jony Ive ever had a hand in. </sarcasm> Seriously, though, Apple probably did market research and I’d expect a blind “what brand do you think this is” would be the first thing they’d ask.
I believe it comes with a selection of Apple stickers - knock yourself out.![]()
Omg I know right? Just give everyone the same ports and Ethernet. That’s such basic things a desktop needs and the base model is expensive enough.
Comparing the slick beautiful iMac 2017 with the new 2021 iMac, I am incredibly disappointed. There is nothing beautiful or clever about it. The colors are made for an 8 year old, the shape is boring, and why didn't they make it all screen? After all it runs on an iPad type M1 chip. No, a total miss step in my opinion. And by the way, why can't they make the stand rotate the screen into portrait at will. This would have been clever. I wait for the next design upgrade.I Was Looking At A MacRumors Comment Section On The New iMac, Mostly All Of The Comments Were "The New Design Looks So Ugly" And "Who Will Buy This?" I Just Wanna Know Who Here Likes The New iMac
If you don't care avout other people's opinion, why are you on this forum to begin with?I don't regard ANY opinion regarding the design of a product to be worth the breath that was wasted on it. It's just totally personal, and in some instances, deliberately provocative - in the same way that trolls are.
Thus, the fact that as far as I can see from pictures rather than the actual object, I like the design of the new iMac ought to be totally immaterial to anyone else. However, I do like it, and I have bought one. For me, the issue of bezels is a nonsense because when I'm using my current 27-inch iMac (which has black bezels), I'm looking at the screen, not the surround.
I would rather try knitting mud than trawl macrumors.com for subjective opinions.