I did watch it in the end as it autoplayed next.Well seeing this topic is here, I found Lewis's view interesting...
I did watch it in the end as it autoplayed next.
I won’t disagree with him about the Xr display.
Yes I’m speaking from the point of a tech enthusiast. A normal person wouldn’t even notice or care.I don't disagree either...to a point. The people who frequent tech blogs, YouTube reviews, etc, are the folks you pay attention to specs like this and will notice. The average consumer couldnt care less and as long as it appears good enough to them, they're fine. As Lew points our, the non-plus iPhones have been rocking the same PPI for years and there has been zero uproar from iPhone owners about it. Things like size of the device, battery and camera quality matter more. They have no clue what resolution any of there tech has.
Do I think Apple is doing this to cut their costs as much as possible and maximize profit? Yup, for certain. Should tech/smartphone enthusiasts get a XR? In most cases, nope. Should general consumers stay away? Only if they actually give a ****—most won’t care one bit.
Yes I’m speaking from the point of a tech enthusiast. A normal person wouldn’t even notice or care.
I think it’s right up there with “infinity display”...That made me laugh, because it's exactly what will happen. Coining the term "Liquid Retina" is full of cheese, and might be the single-most gimmicky marketing spin we've ever seen from Apple. It'll work though, rest assured. They have histrically had the best LCD panels.
Of course. It's all marketing jargon. The only difference here is no one else is doing the curved edges like Samsung. Apple put a marketing spin on a screen that isn't much different than the original retina display, which were also LCD, and by Apple standards "Liquid Retina", by the way.I think it’s right up there with “infinity display”...
Well seeing this topic is here, I found Lewis's view interesting...
Are you referring to his Pocophone video? If so, you have a point, but I think he's angling this more from the point that this $750 phone has a lower-res display than their old flagship phones, like the 6/7/8 Plus phones that sold in the same price range.But guys, I thought we didn't need 1080p anyway. I heard that from Unboxed Therapy.
Are you referring to his Pocophone video? If so, you have a point, but I think he's angling this more from the point that this $750 phone has a lower-res display than their old flagship phones, like the 6/7/8 Plus phones that sold in the same price range.
I don't care either way, it doesn't affect me at all,but surely you can see he has a point?But guys, I thought we didn't need 1080p anyway. I heard that from Unboxed Therapy.
I don't care either way, it doesn't affect me at all,but surely you can see he has a point?
I thought he said it had the same ppi as the iPhone 4? Although in the next breath he pulled out a galaxy S4 and said it had a 1080p display. I find his style quite annoying because he shouts a lot so I was kind of dipping in and out of the video.I think resolution isn't an important metric for a phone screen as long as it's above a certain number. He's just complaining because Apple videos get views.
Hell, the video kept repeating that it has the same resolution as the 4. That's blatantly false.
What a ****ing hack. He jumps back and forth between PPI and resolution in the very first minute of the video as if the two are interchangeable. What a shmuck.Well seeing this topic is here, I found Lewis's view interesting...
I thought he said it had the same ppi as the iPhone 4? Although in the next breath he pulled out a galaxy S4 and said it had a 1080p display. I find his style quite annoying because he shouts a lot so I was kind of dipping in and out of the video.
What a ****ing hack. He jumps back and forth between PPI and resolution in the very first minute of the video as if the two are interchangeable. What a shmuck.
That's upselling, a standard practice literally everywhere in a consumer based economy.He's an amusing reviewer, he is right about Apple trying to push people to spend more money to get the higher resolution screens. That's greedy of them to do.
He's an amusing reviewer, he is right about Apple trying to push people to spend more money to get the higher resolution screens. That's greedy of them to do.
What a ****ing hack. He jumps back and forth between PPI and resolution in the very first minute of the video as if the two are interchangeable. What a shmuck.
My mom needs a new phone to replace her 6 Plus and I am her tech advisor. I had thought that she needs to stick with iPhone bc she is so tech-challenged but now I'm re-thinking this as lack of home button and the switch to gestures will completely rock her world.. At least with Samsung she would have a back button and virtual home button.....
We are talking $700 vs $1500.As opposed to other companies that want you to spend less money.
We are talking $700 vs $1500.
That's the point... Apple is pushing users to waste their money on the $1500 phone to get a better resolution instead of atleast adding the same resolution from their 5.5" device to their 6.1" one. That's not business that's greed and milking cash from costumers as much as they can.What? You're comparing the lowest end to the maxed our highest end. What are you talking about?