You ask what is my Agenda, haha LOL, good one, i see your a marketing representative from the way you use words., as if people should not know what they are paying for, is that a problem for you?
Here is what i will do on my own time ( and i will not accept any bribery to avoid this)
I have a DUET and will open it to take some pictures and post them here.
I am trying to get a hold of a friends "MBox Pro" and also take pictures of whats inside not only to show you all the parts Apogee uses as well but compare it to another first generations 2007 MBox pro which sounds even better and the parts used in it where not the same at all, Digidesign also did this with there first mbox, the convertors in the Mbox sound really good, they are the same ones used by Metric Halo today, there UL2 i believe although i will check if anyone cares.,
My point is companies change there parts with out telling us all, Digidesign never publicly announced that they downgraded the Mbox 1 during there second factory orders, making a killing on the costs while even the chips for the units dropped in prices over in Japan., meanwhile users think they have a Mbox they tried which was a previous model., and Apogee claims your getting that Apogee sound when its the same guts in a Mbox Pro., are you a SUCKER or will you help stop companies from this abuse?
Ill be back in a week with fotos and my review.
I do get what you're trying to say, but you're forgetting a more important aspect, well for me anyway.
For example, two people can have the exactly same mic, pre-amp, and comp. And record something that is precisely the same, yet could come out with very different sounds (at least to the professional's ears), due to having different power supplies, electric cables, audio cables, bypassing or using a patch bay, etc (not even talking about room ambience, mic positioning, etc).
So for me, it's all about how a company tweaks its components to get the best possible result and to give it both value for money and that 'company's sound', in this case Apogee.
I'm not qualified to talk about the Duet here, seeing as I don't have one and don't need one, but by all accounts it's definition and quality far exceeds others in it's price range and class. So it's a job well done by Apogee.
If it's true that it uses the same components as the mbox pro, then I praise Apogee for using those parts, tweaking them nicely and for actually selling them cheaper than their rivals.
Isn't this one of the reasons you've got a Duet? I don't think anyone's a 'sucker' for buying and praising and enjoying the Duet. I say good on them.
P.S.
Could you expand on the MOTU comments please.