Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What other options to i have to get my messages, photos etc all synced across devices and backed up? Well, i need iCloud for that. And Apple are obviously aware that they put cameras on their phones that now create large file sizes making their free tier of storage useless. Cloud storage is important for these devices. A huge jump in cost to have them working as advertised is not fair game. Plus, if you have family members sharing your storage, good luck in getting them all to do cloud house keeping or consider moving to a different cloud provider for storing their photos.
Or that 13GB stupid requirement for a os update...
 
That said - there's room for other privacy-focused alternatives, if the OS were required to accommodate them. Hmmm...

Why should Apple be forced to do that, beyond allowing apps to access photos, contacts, messages, etc. and save them to their own cloud storage? Let the app run in the background to automatically update the server when things change, or just periodically.
 
That argument makes zero sense.

No one wants to backup (handover) their sensitive data to 3rd party services. Not even you.

I don't think Apple is any better than Microsoft to be honest - and frankly, not that important to really worry about privacy about some other folks do.

I already use OneDrive for my photos and all my business and personal documents are there too, there's nothing else I would worry about.
 
Which? are one of the leading British consumer advocacy/rights groups whose reviews and opinions are valued by consumers and advertisers. They have no affiliation with the state.

This said they're not wrong. If you're happy with the Apple ecosystem (I certainly am) you won't see a problem. I understand that point of view.

But the whole point of an open market is consumers also have choice and any barrier to data migration or access is a clear roadblock to this. In the case of iCloud I can bulk-transfer my Photos to Google its true, but moving over loads of documents requires manually downloading everything. I have to copy-and-paste my notes, I cannot extract DRM-ridden book purchases nor are app licences transferable.

Most of this is also true of Google and Microsoft but those companies provide their apps for competing platforms where Apple does not. This is in the truest sense of the word a form of lock-in as most customers lack the skills or patience to extract everything manually.

Apple produce apps for Windows to let users sync their data locally with their PC. All they have to do is provide an iCloud app for Android to let others do the same (and maybe also mop up some extra service subscriptions along the way?)

I'll end with a quick reminder that it was only releasing iTunes for Windows and making the iPod PC compatible that sent its sales curve nearly perpendicular. Opening up to new markets only feeds growth.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NetMage
Anyone else starting to think both EU and the UK have gone totally mental?

The gov needs to reign in when the super big corps act like the laws don’t apply to them but it’s starting to look like the EU and the UK now acting like they’re the ones drunk with power lately with nothing better to do.
You do realize that this is a British consumer group and not the UK government?
 
I don't think Apple is any better than Microsoft to be honest - and frankly, not that important to really worry about privacy about some other folks do.

I already use OneDrive for my photos and all my business and personal documents are there too, there's nothing else I would worry about.
If you’re not concerned about the consequences of big companies mining your data then we definitely are from two different worlds.

I’m in tech and fully aware of the consequences mass mining of data can have so I’d fully disagree with your stance. History dictates Apple is more cautious with their users’ data than any other big company out there. Made possible by them making money from hardware than from their users’ data.
 
For exemple Google One offers 100 GB for 20 euros per year which I consider a very good offer for normal users and more useful than 50 GB for 12 euros which is what Apple offers. The Google 200 GB plan is also cheaper and from beyond that I don't care.

And of course Google has a free baseline of 15 GB which is a lot better than Apple with 5 GB and usable for a lot of users.

Apple One family offering on the other hand is pretty nice and it's what I use.

Ah, so when you said iCloud is “really poor” you just meant "expensive"

That said, I agree with you that it's expensive and that the 5GB free tier is a joke (heck, even Gruber thinks so).

Apple should have given each user 5GB every time they buy a new device, but their chosen strategy seems to be to pump up service revenue as much as they can.
 
Last edited:
It's still incredibly sad that by ~2010, capitalists went with cloud direction instead of making well-integrated self-hosting solutions.

Imagine having all your stuff on a Mac mini at home, including phone backups, contacts, etc. Free forever, fully yours, just don't forget to replace hard drives once in a while.

I'm certain that every person could easily manage that setup, just like all the "normie" people used to pirate music for their iPods back in the day.

But of course, it's harder for police and for data brokers to access data that way, so here we are.
There's nothing stopping anyone from making a self-hosting solution for regular consumers.

In fact, I think most cloud services that are oriented towards businesses permit self-hosting.

I think the issue is:
1. The market is small as most people don't care + don't have enough technical know-how (remember, most houses need somebody from the ISP to come and setup their cable box/modem... I can set this stuff up myself, and I suspect you can too, but we're odd.)
2. Where's the business case? Nobody wants to pay a recurring fee for it. The one-time fee people would be willing to pay isn't much, and then this just works for 10+ years so they won't be back to spend more for awhile.

For the most part, all I really want is a self hosted option for my pictures/videos. Which... I think there might actually be options for this? I think you can buy a hard drive that connects to wifi and has a phone app that automatically syncs with it for free.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mr_Brightside_@
Which? Has become irrelevant about 24 years ago, only good for old ladies to do research on what toaster, hostess trolley or corby trouserpress (yes I know ;)) to buy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kamyk35
You’d think the iPhone was the only phone on the market. Nobody forcing anyone to use iCloud. Nobody forcing anyone to buy an iPhone. As much as I think competition is good and their overall objective in terms of improving competition in the mobile space is something I support, Apple’s tight integration of services with hardware is something I specifically enjoy. Leave it alone and buy something else.
 
I don't use cloud storage any more, I don't have a iPhone, but I do have a Mac mini, use an Android phone and also have a Windows machine. i used to use Drop box and on my Android phone I could use it with their app, Windows I could and on my Mac I did for a couple of months. Even had the app on Linux.
So can you not have Drop box app on IOS?
If you can, then how is Apple pushing people into buying Icloud? It is no different to Google and Microsoft.
I am in the U.K
 
Do any of the alternative cloud services offer 50GB for £ 0.99 a month? That’s virtually free. This lawsuit is clearly a pile-on. Meanwhile, I’m getting by just fine on the base 5GB of iCloud space… with five different devices.
 
That’s the point
But is that not the same for anything? On Windows, you put your files into a folder, and it is synced to the MS cloud, Android is the same, you can have your files synced automatically to the Google cloud. I am not sure what Which is on about.
 
I agree that 5GB of free iCloud storage in 2024 is rather pathetic, compared to 15GB+ of rivals. However, with all the recent changes Apple are forced to implement due to the DMA provisions, I guess this “iCloud lockdown” will soon go away by itself, as the UK will be working on similar laws.
 
I really hope one outcome of this will be, that Apple makes local backups more convenient. I have plenty of storage on my always-on NAS. If I could conveniently backup all iOS devices to that locally and automatically, that would be glorious 🙌.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.