Umm - like I said before the iPhone 16 Pro’s already have WiFi 7, so your statement is false. Again - makes no sense.Cause they want you to upgrade again in 2025. Revenue.
Umm - like I said before the iPhone 16 Pro’s already have WiFi 7, so your statement is false. Again - makes no sense.Cause they want you to upgrade again in 2025. Revenue.
The one thing I was really hoping they would add. Was very surprised to see it wasn’t on the new Pro iPads, then missing from the new Mini, and now also missing from the new MacBook Pros. Why the hell did they include on the new iPhone but not on these devices is beyond me. If the argument is that most people don’t yet have a WiFi 7 router, why include it on any device? Very disappointed.no wifi 7![]()
The M4 Pro also requires the "unbinned" model to have more than 36GB.
But what about in 2 to 3 years when people are still rocking their $4000 M4 Macbook Pro, and WIFI 7 is defacto??? It's a huge dissapointment considering the iPhone 16 supports it.Like 4 people in the world are set up with WiFi 7.
It makes absolutely sense. We talking Macbook Pro right?Umm - like I said before the iPhone 16 Pro’s already have WiFi 7, so your statement is false. Again - makes no sense.
They could probably put the Max chip in a Mac Mini, but I don't see how that would make any sense. It will unnecessarily constrict thermals for the chip and it won't save any significant cost or price.Why can't you get the Max in a Mac Mini? If the cooling in the MacBook Pro is sufficient you'd think the cooling in the Mini would be too (even the new tiny one). Probably to help them differentiate the Studio (and charge extra for it).
Defacto doesn't mean "lesser" WiFi will stop working.But what about in 2 to 3 years when people are still rocking their $4000 M4 Macbook Pro, and WIFI 7 is defacto??? It's a huge dissapointment considering the iPhone 16 supports it.
Then why include it on the new iPhone, owned at this point presumably, by millions? Makes no sense.Like 4 people in the world are set up with WiFi 7.
Hmm - we are. So, Apple updates iPhone 16 Pro’s with wifi 7 and not any other new devices. Wow - great for you if that makes sense, but absolutely makes 0 sense to me. Just baffeling. Don’t now one other person I talk to that it makes sense too. 🙂It makes absolutely sense. We talking Macbook Pro right?
Just to clear things up. It does NOT make sense to NOT upgrade the MBP with Wifi 7.Hmm - we are. So, Apple updates iPhone 16 Pro’s with wifi 7 and not any other new devices. Wow - great for you if that makes sense, but absolutely makes 0 sense to me. Just baffeling. Don’t now one other person I talk to that it makes sense too. 🙂
Power/cooling would be my guess.Damn, the M4 Max (low) only supports 36GB memory. For comparison, the M3 Max (low) supported up to 96GB. Apple is really squeezing people to upgrade to the topmost spec to get more memory. What's even crazier is the M4 Pro in the Mac mini can be configured to 64GB memory but in the MacBook Pro the M4 Pro is limited to 48GB. Why??
Exactly! Makes no sense whatsoever. When the new iPad Pro was released I almost bought one until I saw it was still wifi 6e. Then I considered the new Mini until again saw wifi 6e. Went to bed last night thinking for sure would be included in the new Macbook Pro, but nope. Not buying anything without wifi 7 at this point.Interesting comment. When companies like Apple start producing more WiFi 7 devices that will make people like me upgrade to WiFi 7. I am sure others would agree and would upgrade to WiFi 7 too. I think anything Apple releases now should be WiFi 7. Makes no sense that iPhone 16 Pro’s are WiFi 7 capable, but all the new devices announced this week are not.
Why can't you get the Max in a Mac Mini? If the cooling in the MacBook Pro is sufficient you'd think the cooling in the Mini would be too (even the new tiny one). Probably to help them differentiate the Studio (and charge extra for it).
Also waiting for benchmark and actual use comparison between M2 Max and M4 Max.I got the m2 max 16" with 96gb and 4tb second hand for 2800cdn. Hoping to see benchmarks on m4 max as trade in value for my model on apple store is 1500$cdn. Eek. I like the large screen and performance all the same and so far so good. Importantly is the battery efficiency with the new chips.
What's even crazier is the M4 Pro in the Mac mini can be configured to 64GB memory but in the MacBook Pro the M4 Pro is limited to 48GB. Why??
Could be yield and cost differentials.So after 2 generations of Pro and Max having the same CPU part, and 1 generation where the Pro was seriously nerfed compared to the Max, now the Pro is closer to the Max again, but not the same. I wonder what drove this decision.
So after 2 generations of Pro and Max having the same CPU part, and 1 generation where the Pro was seriously nerfed compared to the Max, now the Pro is closer to the Max again, but not the same. I wonder what drove this decision.
Probably quite a bit more than that, there are cheapish routers and mesh networks available now.Like 4 people in the world are set up with WiFi 7.
My uneducated guess is that in iPhone there is Qualcomm chip with wifi 7 but other devices use other chip that do not have v.7.Then why include it on the new iPhone, owned at this point presumably, by millions? Makes no sense.
Ah, good point. Hadn’t considered that. Still such a disappointment.My uneducated guess is that in iPhone there is Qualcomm chip with wifi 7 but other devices use other chip that do not have v.7.