The car project I am sure really helped a lot of the next gen Apple CarPlay. So we got that out of it.
You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about. EVs convert over 77% of the electrical energy from the grid to power at the wheels. Conventional gasoline vehicles only convert about 12%–30% of the energy stored in gasoline to power at the wheels.They are inefficient and don’t have good ranges before they need time consuming charges. And they aren’t green.
If they are out, they’re out. They are not coming back when the market matures. That would make no sense giving the long development time.EVs need to get cheaper to become mass market and China + India are ready to flood the Western markets. Meanwhile, Governments are failing to regulate a standard and are slacking on the infrastructure in the hope that private businesses will do all the work.
I do see quite a few Teslas in the UK but they are very expensive and still a status symbol out of reach of the average worker's salary. The ICE used market is still very strong for this reason along with the mistrust of used EV batteries in the long term.
Apple is right to bail on a car project until the market fully switches to EV and all the kinks and standards are ironed out. That's if the Government doesn't price us mere mortals off the road before then.
You obviously do not study enough news / information sources...I'll agree with you that they aren't green as nothing really is...They are inefficient and don’t have good ranges before they need time consuming charges. And they aren’t green.
Yeah you're fine now. What about when ExxonMobil decides your gallon of gas at $2.65 is better off at $9. You'll buy an EV the same week papi-chulo.Good call. Electric cars need to go bye bye.
I don't understand people who say this. I know what you're literally saying, and what it means, but you (and others) say it as if it's a big important point.
Tesla hasn't yet enabled it to operate without a driver. That's literally a boolean - a single bit being flipped - away from being on. They haven't enabled it because the software isn't there yet. Nobody said it was. It is close though. Close enough that it could roll out today. Then they'd need to collect data for a few weeks/months to show regulators that a human driver isn't necessary, and maybe allowing humans to override it makes it more dangerous instead of safer.
There’s no way with HW3 or HW4 that FSD will ever be close to Level 4 or 5.I don't understand people who say this. I know what you're literally saying, and what it means, but you (and others) say it as if it's a big important point.
Tesla hasn't yet enabled it to operate without a driver. That's literally a boolean - a single bit being flipped - away from being on. They haven't enabled it because the software isn't there yet. Nobody said it was. It is close though. Close enough that it could roll out today. Then they'd need to collect data for a few weeks/months to show regulators that a human driver isn't necessary, and maybe allowing humans to override it makes it more dangerous instead of safer.
It's a lie from Tesla, though. Its absolutely not "FULL SELF DRIVING," and it's not even CLOSE to being that. Doesn't really matter if it can do 0 intervention door to door drives, when those drives need to be in specific locations, in ideal conditions. That's not remotely good enough. Full self driving needs to be as good as a human, at a minimum. A human didn't learn to drive by sitting and watching millions of hours of footage from Tesla cameras. A human learns to drive by using a ton of other skills/lessons/experiences throughout their life, and using multiple sensory inputs. There's so much more than goes into human intelligence that you cannot get with the type of AI training model they're using...
You know what gets you to true Full Self Driving? Artificial General Intelligence. And until that happens, Full Self Driving isn't happening.
Hey now, bikes are pretty dang green. Extremely efficient as far as distance covered vs energy consumed goes and the only waste is the stuff you'd already be producing just by being alive.You obviously do not study enough news / information sources...I'll agree with you that they aren't green as nothing really is...
Tesla is pushing the tech in a very real way, but their marketing and lassiez-faire attitude toward the whole problem attracts the attention and patronage of some of the worst existing drivers on the road, who then grossly misuse the system Tesla has developed. That, more than anything else, is probably why Tesla won't be the first to the line with a true driverless vehicle.So, Tesla is absolutely lying. There's no way anybody sane would let a car drive itself without a combination of lidar, radar, and cameras to go with wheel sensors and inertia sensors.
But I would disagree that you need artificial general intelligence. One thing you REALLY need to keep in mind is that humans are absolutely TERRIBLE at driving. If somebody were to invent the car for the first time today there's no way a product that unsafe would ever be allowed on the streets. All a self-driving car really needs to save a lot of lives is to be significantly safer than humans, and I think that's definitely happening already.
It just ain't gonna be Tesla. And if they keep up the bullcrap, NHTSA is going to boot their "full self driving" right off the road.
Why in the world would you believe that?It is close though. Close enough that it could roll out today. Then they'd need to collect data for a few weeks/months to show regulators that a human driver isn't necessary, and maybe allowing humans to override it makes it more dangerous instead of safer.
“It’s like headphones for your legs.”Steven Jobs' Apple Car: Apple Car.
Love my Tesla, and will get another one next year. However, they’re not the future. There’s simply not enough raw minerals for them to ever be viable for the masses.Electric cars are the future whether you like it or not. They're just not part of Apple's future, apparently.
We’re glad that MS didn’t make cars either.![]()
While disappointing, it was probably a good decision by Apple to kill the project mostly because the vehicle market as a whole is struggling, margins are thin, Apple is late to the game, and the cost of batteries is out of control.They are inefficient and don’t have good ranges before they need time consuming charges. And they aren’t green.
Most of the Teslas I commute with every day (you see the same cars/drivers heading towards the industrial/business parks) do use the road like their own personal playground and always use the fast acceleration at every opportunity. Tyres must be cheaper for them? This starts wacky races as ICE drivers with high end cars try to race them (I see you Audi/BMW driver).Tesla is pushing the tech in a very real way, but their marketing and lassiez-faire attitude toward the whole problem attracts the attention and patronage of some of the worst existing drivers on the road, who then grossly misuse the system Tesla has developed. That, more than anything else, is probably why Tesla won't be the first to the line with a true driverless vehicle.