There are plenty of EVs from various brands that run great.The iPhone of EVs already exists: Tesla, and Tim Cook realized that. Whenever people say they want an EV, they actually mean a Tesla. This is why Ford, GM, Mercedes have all failed miserably in comparison. The only competition is with Chinese EV companies and that's only for their domestic market.
Of course there are. Battery technology is rapidly evolving. We’re not going to stay with Lithium forever.Love my Tesla, and will get another one next year. However, they’re not the future. There’s simply not enough raw minerals for them to ever be viable for the masses.
Apple AirPlaneThank god, now they can finally focus on creating a supersonic jet
Xiaomi’s EV wasn’t announced today. It was announced a few months ago.Is it a coincidence that just today Xiaomi announced its first electric car?
Apple AirPlane
Lithium ion batteries and their components on the other hand…You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about. EVs convert over 77% of the electrical energy from the grid to power at the wheels. Conventional gasoline vehicles only convert about 12%–30% of the energy stored in gasoline to power at the wheels.
And they don’t pollute cities. So yes, they are more green.
I dont think they will ever do a mass market car or TV.. too much risk and investment with big items logistics involved an all. I dont think they want any kind of gamble really that requires big investment and in an already loaded marketplace like cars and TVs where a failure costs a lot more than VR glasses segment for instance.
Electric cars and TVs is going nowhere though and are here to stay, even if I feel some kind of real push hydrogen car is probably on the horizon somewhere as well.
let's wait until that happens, and, Tesla taking responsibility and liability in case of accidents, which will happen ...I don't understand people who say this. I know what you're literally saying, and what it means, but you (and others) say it as if it's a big important point.
Tesla hasn't yet enabled it to operate without a driver. That's literally a boolean - a single bit being flipped - away from being on. They haven't enabled it because the software isn't there yet. Nobody said it was. It is close though. Close enough that it could roll out today. Then they'd need to collect data for a few weeks/months to show regulators that a human driver isn't necessary, and maybe allowing humans to override it makes it more dangerous instead of safer.
Best consumer routers I have ever had.Being back the AirPort!
Please Explain how they’re not efficient.. especially compared to gas powered cars.They are inefficient and don’t have good ranges before they need time consuming charges. And they aren’t green.
Sorry that is not an official Apple approved color. Would you like Space Grey?Color me shocked.
Someone needs to let Japan know then.....Hydrogen cars are NEVER going to be a thing. It's a dead end.
Hydrogen is quite possibly the single least efficient way to power a car ever thought of. You can make hydrogen from natural gas, in which case you're wasting a lot of energy to do that (and then you've still got the CO2 to deal with), wasting a lot of energy transporting it, and wasting a lot of energy using it in a fuel cell. Or you can make it with electricity and water, in which case it's a MASSIVE waste of electricity. It makes FAR more sense to just use electricity to charge a battery.
Oh, and hydrogen is even more explodey than gasoline.
Phantom braking hasn't been an issue since they moved from radar. The radar readings would occasionally disagree with the vision readings, causing braking. It hasn't been an issue in years.
From its beginning, Apple has controlled the hardware. Their reputation for “it just works” came from supporting an Apple printer to work with your Macintosh. You didn’t have to mess with DIP switches. It came with the right cable in the box. Hobbyists preferred to build their own, but Apple was for people who didn’t want to think about technology details.There's no reason Apple needs to own the car, they need to own the interface. They likely learned enough to know how to offer the integrations that will help keep their devices relevant (CarKey, CarPlay upgrades, etc.). The money is going to be in the other things you can do if your car drives itself. If Apple can get you on an Apple device, or using Apple services, they make money. If Google gets you on a Google device, browsing the web, etc., they make money. They never needed the car, they want your extra free time and eyeballs.
"Is this about the McRib? Seriously, dude. Let it go."I believe precisely none of this. Apple has decided to pretend to cancel the product to buy themselves more time. There is no way in hell they cancel this. No way, José.
Millions they invested? Their investment in Chinese ride-sharing company Didi Chuxing was $1B by itself. Apple have invested many billions of dollars into this and will continue to do so as they refine their self-driving software and street mapping systems.
Someone needs to let Japan know then.....
I'm sorry but you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Both production AP and FSD Beta work in the rain.Absolutely! What's a few pedestrians or semi-trucks if they can solve the phantom braking by getting rid of the only technology that works in the rain, amiright? /s
NHTSA moves slowly, but eventually every Tesla without radar is going to be recalled.