Drop in a US McDs mid-morning when the retired crowd hangs out. Tons of flip phones!![]()
You'll be there one day, kid.
Drop in a US McDs mid-morning when the retired crowd hangs out. Tons of flip phones!![]()
Who said all? I'm 68 and use several models of iOS and Android phones - and write apps for them. Still, look around McDs sometime. Lots of flip phones among the older set, even if you and I don't have one.Yea well I’m part of that retired crowd and I have a X. Not all retired people have flip phones.worked all my life put two kids through college with only a high school education. I take that as an insult.
[doublepost=1512776068][/doublepost]This reply is for akansaskid
Hey, Dave, I didn't say mine were high dollar. No X for me.Well I’m the same age as you and if anyone would know it should be you and I that not all retired people can have high dollar phones.if I read you wrong I apologize.
Who said all? I'm 68 and use several models of iOS and Android phones - and write apps for them. Still, look around McDs sometime. Lots of flip phones among the older set, even if you and I don't have one.
And to add to your point, most of the average iPhone consumers dont pay attention to the iPhone X the way others do on here . Its the heavy tech enthusiasts that are more prone to looking for defects, watching every movement with their iPhone shipment thread, who has the better display, etc. I would say the majority of iPhones I see in the general public is the iPhone 6s or iPhone 7. The iPhone X is still a fairly rare sight, being it's only been available for a month.
Tell your friend to re-do their FaceID setup. My first one was flawless out of the gate...my replacement didn't seem as reliable, so I reset it. Much faster and more reliable now.Yesterday I met some old friends, one of them has an X. After "on-hand", rest of us agree that it is not worth about 1300$ for a 64Gb X, it is crazy. My friend said that FaceID in his X only works 95%.
These "top notch" iPhone designs will probably still sell about nearly a half billion combined. Maybe 300M minimum since Apple has iOS all to itself.
Thanks, iPod. It set the table for third-party accessories ecosystem. An ecosystem within the ecosystem.
I remember when Apple used to reach for the stars. Now they only reach for your wallet.
https://www.theverge.com/2017/2/21/14691586/apple-ecosystem-walls-nilay-patel-show-notes
APPLE’S ECOSYSTEM WALLS KEEP GETTING HIGHER
- Dieter reviewed Android Wear 2.0 with an iPhone, and found that it just isn’t very good. Basically everywhere Google couldn’t get access to something on the iPhone — iMessage, for instance — it tried to build the entire feature into the watch. Messy!
- Apple has some weird incentives around the iPhone right now — as sales taper off, the company has publicly said the next plan is to extract more revenue from every iPhone owner. Part of that is services like Apple Music, but another big part of that is the huge iPhone accessory market — and Apple is setting itself up so that its own products have major advantages over everyone else.
- Take headphones, for example: Sean O’Kane reviewed the new Doppler Labs Hear One wireless earbuds and found that they sound better than AirPods, but have some frustrating Bluetooth issues.
- No one else has access to the simplified pairing and management APIs Apple uses to make the AirPods and other Apple W1 products work better on iOS, so if you want the simplest wireless headphones to use with Apple products, you have to buy Apple. If you’re Doppler Labs and you come up with a killer competitor to the W1, you’re still stuck with Bluetooth, unless you convince Apple to open up the new API hooks in iOS and macOS so your chip can use them, too.
- In another era, Doppler Labs would solve this problem by shipping a custom driver for Windows or Mac, but none of that is allowed on iOS. How do headphone manufacturers compete in a world where Apple doesn’t have a clear incentive to make standard Bluetooth work as well as its custom W1 Bluetooth experience?
- Same with wearables: the killer features for wearables are basically fitness tracking and notifications. Apple won’t ever let anyone else touch iMessage replies, so the only wearable worth buying if you’re an iPhone owner interested in a smartwatch is the Apple Watch. Fitbit might struggle along with its popular fitness trackers as long as they’re better at fitness features than the Apple Watch, but the company’s hazy ambitions to take on the smartwatch market are eventually going to hit a brick wall made of Apple API restrictions.
- In a world where Apple sells around the same number of phones every year, it’s more important than ever that the company increase sales of high-margin services and accessories. And if the two most expensive hardware accessories for a phone are headphones and some kind of wearable, Apple is in a position to make sure it has significant advantages over any potential competitor.
- It’s great to say that everyone else should just compete, but if you can’t get Apple to update iOS to support whatever new wireless thing you invent, it might as well not exist for an iPhone owner. This has already happened once before: there are tons of Bluetooth headphones out there that support better-quality aptX audio, but iOS doesn’t support it, so... yeah.
Out of about 15 employees, I'm the only one with an iPhone. Everyone else has Samsungs or other phones. I bought a 7+ about two weeks ago and have been using it but I frequently show up with an SE, 6S+ or a Note 8.18 employees here. Nobody has the X.
In fact, I'm the only one, with the 8 Plus, who doesn't have either the 7/7 Plus or a Samsung.
That's how it is when you're a CNC machinist in a shop full of guys working in metal fabrication. Everybody cares more about beer than what phone they or someone else is using.
congratulations for proving my point for the 437th timeI have over 100 people working in my company, not one has ordered an iPhone X. Its easy to make stats work for your argument.![]()
Weird, half the people at my business have the iPhone X.
I guess that’s better than saying half the weird people at my business have the X
[doublepost=1513378920][/doublepost]4 weeks ago I didn’t see 1 othe X on the trains in and out of Boston.
The last week I am seeing more and more X’s.
Just look for air pods and most likely there will be an X in hand. (generalization)
Watch 3 walk out the door tonight during my visit at the Apple store tonight.
Sorry I derailed the thread over to flip phones, but it is a little germane to the OP's premise of the latest batch of iPhones lacking mojo:
Each of us has our own use case and buy phones accordingly, within our threshhold of financial comfort. For the 80-yr-old who only makes phone calls, it's hard to argue that a flip phone isn't the best phone for him. A flip phone is faster and easier for simple phone calls for any of us. Similarly, for someone (like me) who only wants a phone for surfing (reading), texts, email, and rare phone calls, but no video or music streaming, the latest round of phones do nothing more than previous models - why upgrade? The gamers, Netflix addicts, and phone enthusiasts are always going to want the latest, fastest, coolest models.
The question becomes how big this last field is, and how much can technology continue to leap year after year. Or, even, how can these latest features increase my joy and use of a phone, versus their being novelties soon to wear off.
I don’t think AirPods necessarily means X Haha
I don’t think AirPods necessarily means X Haha