Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This ranking is described as a modern, 21st-century evaluation of the greatest records ever made, created independently of streaming statistics.
So instead of figuring out "what do people actually enjoy listening to?" they decided to go with the opinion of some industry snobs? That really explains some of the entries on this list. :p
 
I used to think lists like this mattered in some way, and would argue about them with my friends. Much like I used to think the Academy Awards mattered in some way.

These lists don't matter. Like what you like. No lists such as this represents anything of any consequence outside of the organization that promotes it trying to sell you something ;)

Rather than using these lists as confirmation bias or getting mad over what’s on or not on it, folks should use it as an opportunity to discover some music they've never listened to before. I discovered Aja thanks to this list and plan on listening to some others, including Lauryn Hill. Hell, I’m no Swifty, but I was listening to 1989 the other day to see what some of her deeper cuts were instead of just the stuff you always hear on the radio.
 
Last edited:
Beat me to it... DSOTM was on the charts for some 990 weeks! This list is utter bollocks.
1716384183535.png

Did you look at the list?
 
View attachment 2381263
Did you look at the list?

Um... I looked at the list that was presented in the article that is referenced in the post...


I didn't see any mention of the list continuing on... And the list you reference is top 100... so, why would I look at the top 100 when this mentions top 10...?
 
nr 1 album of all time with a terrible cover of cant take my eyes of you....

if they put Thriller on the number 2 spot i would like everybody to realize that the number one spot was stolen because these day's an album like Thriller would be too much of a risk to come out as the winner. They have to keep in mind that there will be trolls these days regarding MJ and that would have made the discussion about the list too negative.
 
This is embarrassing calling this a "modern evaluation" or in other words a subjective selection process involving a biased group of people without objective data.

I can't imagine what would go wrong when making a best album list without using objective metrics.
Music tastes are inherently subjective. There’s really no way to be objective unless you start only looking at technicals like ‘fastest rap verse’, ‘longest guitar solo’, ‘most albums sold’ which rather ignores the point of music in the first place which is to stir emotion and bring enjoyment. You don’t have to agree with the list, that’s perfectly fine. But it doesn’t make sense to pretend you have some definitive list that is objectively better, because that’s not possible.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.