ModestPenguin said:
I think the price is wrong, itll be more like $199, makes us feel like we arent spending so much, oh and it has a liquid cooling system?
Meh, I'm not buying it unless it has a liquid
metal cooling system.
jbcaro said:
So what you want is one of these:
http://www.oqo.com/hardware/basics/
only running OSX
jbcaro
Well, like an OQO yes, but foldable like a laptop and with a keyboard. Think "OQO + Nintendo DS Lite" (sorry, the thing just looks too much like a small MacBook, i.e. "MacBook mini").
pcortez said:
There's already enough heat/mooing/whining issues with almost properly ventilated macbooks/mackbook pros. imagine, a computer that small and much hotter. instead of not being able to use it on your bare lap, you just won't be able to use, maybe with a stick.
Well, drop the Core Solo to 1GHz if needed, lower the GPU even more (after all 800x480 shouldn't require that much GPU power to drive the display system, not much reserved system RAM either, i.e. 16MB or even 8MB could be more than enough for that resolution).
The point being, if it's a sub-notebook (palmtop?), the target is portability, the market is to replace PDAs with a real computer that runs the same OS as your desktop/laptop. If it doesn't fit in your pocket and can't run 15+ hours on a single charge, you failed in the design. In that case, you lower the specs and try again.
The target uses are: Mail, iCal, Safari, QuickTime, iTunes and the occasional Keynote (last minute changes, presentation), Pages (last minute or on-the-field edits), on-the-go coding (so you can try your ideas on-the-spot instead of making a note about needing to try it when you get back home/at the office), etc.
Being that small, people would understand limitations like video playback video size limited to H.264 480p (screen size anyway) or even the iPod's H.264 320x240, really choppy iTunes visualizer, slow compilation times, Keynote being limited to 800x600 for smooth presentations (especially since the GPU has to resize to 640x480 to fit in the 800x480 LCD if not being output to an external source).
It's meant as an "always-with-you", portable desktop/laptop companion, not a desktop/laptop replacement.
zelmo said:
9" widescreen LCD
1.5GHz Core Solo
512MB RAM
64MB GMA950 GPU
40GB hdd
WiFi
audio out
1 or 2 USB 2.0
10/100 ethernet
charging dock, 4 hour batter life
no optical drive (but offer a stylish external)
$699
I'll take two, please.
Screen is too big, making the whole unit too big. CPU too powerful (would kill the battery). GPU too powerful, takes too much system RAM. Charging dock would be optionnal. Battery life nowhere near enough to be of any utility. All IMO, of course.
pure*evil said:
If someone has a blackberry, why do you need an apple PDA?
That's my point exactly. The BlackBerry is still a PDA with its own operating system. My thought is to replace PDAs with a real computer that runs OS X but that's the size of a PDA.
pure*evil said:
As for the optical drive. Who wants one of the dime-a-dozen external enclosures and a bulky 5.25" drive, when Apple could make a sleek and sexy slim external superdrive? Hell. I'd buy one for my 1.83 MacBook!
Well, I'm sure there's already companies out there doing external drives using laptop DVD drives. At the very least, they should be slim if not sleek and sexy.
dontmatter said:
Sorry, the language part of my brain is not on tody. Are we talking about an uber-thin book with a keyboard, or some crappy thing like the UMPC platform where you lack of input destroys usability?
We're talking about both, it seems. Depends on who you ask.
I, myself, am talking about "uber-thin, uber-small" with a keyboard. A tiny keyboard is still better than a touchscreen keyboard (IMO).
Lack of input destroys usability, too big destroys portability.
IMO, anything bigger than about 5" widescreen for the display and you're out of the PDA realm and into the laptop realm, as far as portability is concerned.
eXan said:
I dont like this. Its not Apple-ish I think. They'd better make a 12 inch MacBook/Pro
They already made it. It's the MacBook, at 13 inches widescreen. Another inch or two smaller doesn't make enough difference to really matter. Yes the 12" PowerBook is/was more portable than the 15" PowerBook, but neither fit in a pocket like an iPaq or a Palm.
cube said:
NO
There is also a faster model than the one shown there.
Here is more info in English. Of course, the integrated graphics suck.
That's still 1.5 inches thick. That's about 7mm thicker than my 12" PowerBook...
Edit: sorry about the multiple posts, but as a user I have no way to delete my own posts to merge them all into one (unless I'm mistaken).