That is NOT what this voice feature is meant for. People who do not have disabilities should not be using the accessibilities features for other purposes.
But existing and older iOS versions already offer AI features. Maybe you have a different parameter for "AI"?Looks like iOS 17 will indeed offer AI features
Who nominated you as the gatekeeper of what people get to use features for? There's plenty of use-cases outside of disabilities (as someone else has already posted). Do you change font sizes? That's accessibility. Do you turn on increased contrast? That's accessibility. Are you one of those people who turns on the LED flash for notifications? Heck, even outside of phones, tablets, and computers, there's accessibility "features" that you yourself probably use pretty often. Do you ride elevators? Walk up ramps even though the stairs are right there? Use automatic doors?That is NOT what this voice feature is meant for. People who do not have disabilities should not be using the accessibilities features for other purposes.
Why the objection? What's behind it?That is NOT what this voice feature is meant for. People who do not have disabilities should not be using the accessibilities features for other purposes.
Some of the Accessibility features are quite handy for anyone. I like the "flash on alert" feature.That is NOT what this voice feature is meant for. People who do not have disabilities should not be using the accessibilities features for other purposes.
I didn't know Vikings had heavy accents.There are plenty of reasons to use an accessibility feature without having a permanent disability.
View attachment 2203309
If the features get a wider spread usage (on top of who you deem "the crowd that this is meant for") it would only benefit the teams that develop those features , they get more feedback/bugs reported and they get more exposure and money inside Apple (im guessing here , but successful SW/features probably get noticed more).That is NOT what this voice feature is meant for. People who do not have disabilities should not be using the accessibilities features for other purposes.
WWDC is too packed to dedicate time to it - quite common they’ll announce stuff now that’s been cut from WWDCI don't see what's the point of divulging them now when WWDC is less than a month away? Any ideas?
No it won't. iPhone 8 isn't expected to get iOS17 update. It's stuck with iOS16.Oh my, this is gonna be great for my mom’s first iPhone (the one I’m using now), hopefully iOS 17 will be supported by the iPhone 8.
Also, this is great news for people with different types of impairments. This is the way.
There are actually leaks and rumors in both directions. Some of them say it will support A11 devices, some others say it won’t. So we won’t know it until WWDC.No it won't. iPhone 8 isn't expected to get iOS17 update. It's stuck with iOS16.
My iPhone 8 is already struggling to perform even basic tasks on iOS 16.5. I'm certain that it will struggle even more on iOS 17. If the engineers at Apple are still sensible, they won't let it happen.There are actually leaks and rumors in both directions. Some of them say it will support A11 devices, some others say it won’t. So we won’t know it until WWDC.
If it’s an update based on stability, performance and bug fixes like iOS 12 was, then it makes sense iOS 17 will support the same devices as iOS 16. In just 14 days we’ll know it.