Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Everything they say anymore is crap. “It’s for the environment” “it’s for safety” on and on.. Don’t piss down my back and tell me it’s raining, it’s insulting. Luckily for Tim Cook, people are getting dumber by the day.
 
I’ve been waiting for the new iPhone because I’m not buying another phone with this P.O.S. Lightning port. It’s absolute garbage if you work outside, too much **** gets in there and is hard to get out safely. My last phone stopped charging or connecting to anything for this reason. I cleaned it out carefully, but one of the pins was bent to the side apparently.. I swear, it was like operation.. because of apples BS opposition to right-to-repair, nobody but apple could fix it. They quoted me $790 to fix it! My blood could have boiled out of my body at that moment. I charged it wirelessly and traded it in. Your problem now ******s, though it still cost me a bunch of money. I have been a Mac guy for at least 25 years.. MacBook Pro, iPhone 13 Pro Max, AirPods Pro, iphone SE for my business phone, an iPad Pro 12.9, Apple Watch ultra, and an Apple TV is the current lineup. I swear, if apple screws with the usb-c connector I’m out. It’s all going on eBay and I will never own another apple product in my life. Tim Cook blows goats, apple hasn’t innovated anything substantial since Steve Jobs passed. Shameful, and I’m pretty confident I’ve earned (payed) for the right to that opinion.
Any connector can collect debris. The phone changing to USB-C won't change anything in that regard. As to you cleaning out the port, if you damage the port doing it that's not the manufacturers fault. USB-C has tighter spacing and far more pins so you'd be even more likely to damage it compared to lightning.
 
Any connector can collect debris. The phone changing to USB-C won't change anything in that regard. As to you cleaning out the port, if you damage the port doing it that's not the manufacturers fault. USB-C has tighter spacing and far more pins so you'd be even more likely to damage it compared to lightning.
AND lightning is a female connector at the phone end, while USB-C is a male, which makes it less robust and more prone to collect debris.

But, since this is water under the bridge now that the transition to USB-C by the whole world is ongoing, I'm also not buying any other device with lightning.
 
Any connector can collect debris. The phone changing to USB-C won't change anything in that regard. As to you cleaning out the port, if you damage the port doing it that's not the manufacturers fault. USB-C has tighter spacing and far more pins so you'd be even more likely to damage it compared to lightning.
I’m not blaming the manufacturer for damaging the port, I am blaming the manufacture for not allowing me to have it fixed anywhere and wanting to charge me $790 to put in a $.35 part. That’s when I started becoming not an apple fan boy anymore, that’s the kind of **** that causes people to make bigger decisions. It’s bad business, regardless of what industry you are in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eduardodfj
Like I said earlier, go look at the specs from USB-IF for the USB Type C connector. It's such a mess that Apple creating some sort of MFi program for the iPhone 15/15 Pro USB Typc C connector might actually be a GOOD thing.
 
Like I said earlier, go look at the specs from USB-IF for the USB Type C connector. It's such a mess that Apple creating some sort of MFi program for the iPhone 15/15 Pro USB Typc C connector might actually be a GOOD thing.
Yet, my iPad and MacBook Pro both have USB-C ports that have been completely trouble free.. and both of those pieces of gear have accompanied me to the field numerous times.
 
Yet, my iPad and MacBook Pro both have USB-C ports that have been completely trouble free.. and both of those pieces of gear have accompanied me to the field numerous times.
I really wonder will the EU and US DoJ object to Apple's idea. Apple may have to drop the MFi requirement and just make the USB Type C connector conform to the most common USB-IF specs (Power Delivery 3.0 for charging, 5 Gbps Certified speed for the iPhone 15, and 20 Gbps Certified for the iPhone 15 Pro/Pro Max).
 
I really wonder will the EU and US DoJ object to Apple's idea. Apple may have to drop the MFi requirement and just make the USB Type C connector conform to the most common USB-IF specs (Power Delivery 3.0 for charging, 5 Gbps Certified speed for the iPhone 15, and 20 Gbps Certified for the iPhone 15 Pro/Pro Max).
I would hope. It‘s hilarious to hear a giant corporation bemoaning government mandates.. corporations in this country much prefer mandating **** to the government and purchasing politicians. Boo-hoo..
 
  • Like
Reactions: SactoGuy18
I really wonder will the EU and US DoJ object to Apple's idea. Apple may have to drop the MFi requirement and just make the USB Type C connector conform to the most common USB-IF specs (Power Delivery 3.0 for charging, 5 Gbps Certified speed for the iPhone 15, and 20 Gbps Certified for the iPhone 15 Pro/Pro Max).
As long as the phone is compliant Apple can do what they want with the cable. The EU reg only mandates power specs and connector; nothing about data.
 
I really wonder will the EU and US DoJ object to Apple's idea. Apple may have to drop the MFi requirement and just make the USB Type C connector conform to the most common USB-IF specs (Power Delivery 3.0 for charging, 5 Gbps Certified speed for the iPhone 15, and 20 Gbps Certified for the iPhone 15 Pro/Pro Max).
The EU regs have nothing to do with data speed so as long as the iPhone charges with non-MFI cables Apple is following the rules.
 
The EU regs have nothing to do with data speed so as long as the iPhone charges with non-MFI cables Apple is following the rules.
I think to avoid further possible litigation from the EU, Apple will likely support Certified 5Gbps data connection speeds on the iPhone 15/15 Plus and Certified 20 Gbps data connection speeds on the iPhone 15 Pro/15 Pro Max per USB-IF specs. Supporting USB-IF Power Delivery 3.0 spec is obvious. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: fat jez
I think to avoid further possible litigation from the EU, Apple will likely support Certified 5Gbps data connection speeds on the iPhone 15/15 Plus and Certified 20 Gbps data connection speeds on the iPhone 15 Pro/15 Pro Max per USB-IF specs. Supporting USB-IF Power Delivery 3.0 spec is obvious. :)
Whatever the speed are I think the Pro Phones will have faster data than the regular Phones, just like the M1 iPads have faster data than the iPad 10.
 
Whatever the speed are I think the Pro Phones will have faster data than the regular Phones, just like the M1 iPads have faster data than the iPad 10.
It appears that's Apple's intention. It will likely be USB 3.2 Gen 1x1 (5 Gbps) for the iPhone 15/15 Plus and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) for the iPhone 15 Pro/15 Pro Max.
 
im thinking about getting a new s23 ultra, or a fold! they are far superior and I can live with android on my phone!
 
Not really a slap in EUs face. They only wanted the same charging port. As did many customers.
Yes but if this rumour is true, then you wont be able to use a non-Apple certified cable with the iPhone. Defeats the object of the exercise.
 
Yes but if this rumour is true, then you wont be able to use a non-Apple certified cable with the iPhone. Defeats the object of the exercise.
Why wouldn’t you be able to use a non-Apple certified cable?

You would be able to use a non-Apple certified cable but it might be at slower speeds.
 
Why wouldn’t you be able to use a non-Apple certified cable?

You would be able to use a non-Apple certified cable but it might be at slower speeds.
When I had iPhones, if I tried to use a non MFI cable to charge I would get a message saying that it is a non Apple cable and wont work (words to that effect).
 
Yes but if this rumour is true, then you wont be able to use a non-Apple certified cable with the iPhone. Defeats the object of the exercise.

When I had iPhones, if I tried to use a non MFI cable to charge I would get a message saying that it is a non Apple cable and wont work (words to that effect).

The EU directive allows additional features as long as they don't interfere with the mandated ones. I read that as Apple or any manufacturer can do what they want with data, special charging features beyond that in the requirements as any cable that is compliant with the spec works without interference.

I'm not sure what sort of special charging feature Apple could do, but data is another story.
 
When I had iPhones, if I tried to use a non MFI cable to charge I would get a message saying that it is a non Apple cable and wont work (words to that effect).
That might be the case with lightning but it can’t be with USBC, except for functionality beyond the required specification.
 
The EU directive allows additional features as long as they don't interfere with the mandated ones. I read that as Apple or any manufacturer can do what they want with data, special charging features beyond that in the requirements as any cable that is compliant with the spec works without interference.

I'm not sure what sort of special charging feature Apple could do, but data is another story.

And I also heard that the EU already warned that if any company limits the functionality of the USB-C cable on its devices, as Apple has been rumored to be planning to do on iphones, they’ll be banned from selling those devices in the EU.
 
And I also heard that the EU already warned that if any company limits the functionality of the USB-C cable on its devices, as Apple has been rumored to be planning to do on iphones, they’ll be banned from selling those devices in the EU.
Only for functionality that is included in the regulation. Functionality outside of the regulations can be locked behind specific cables.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jlc1978
Do streaming apps work via ipads with usbc, or is that broken the same way apple broke hdmi/lightning adapters with ios 16? Wondering if it will be the same for iphones with usbc...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.