What? Startups are almost always personally liable to the foundersNo one would create a startup if they were personally liable. Also, it’s on the investors as well if a startup fails.
What? Startups are almost always personally liable to the foundersNo one would create a startup if they were personally liable. Also, it’s on the investors as well if a startup fails.
Manipulation is never good for a marketPlanet Money had an interesting episode about how modern bankruptcy laws are ultimately good for the economy overall: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/10/04/555646290/episode-648-the-benefits-of-bankruptcy
Bankruptcy is rarely a surprise choice for a business. That they ran it this thin and knew what was coming and then couldn’t pay their employees is absolutely lame and probably driven by greed from whoever owns this.
So lame.
Sometimes troubled businesses believe - with good reason - that some emergency relief financing is about to show up to keep the business going.This specifically. What a rotten move to pull on their employees.
What is that % ?Well if you knew the margins Apple gives you.... at least here in Italy, it's hard to make a living with the % they offer to resellers.
The investors gambled money and lost, I don't feel sorry for them at all. Employees didn't knowingly gamble, they're the ones hurt through no fault of their own.I feel bad for the employees and ever worse for the investors. Those were the ones to lose the most.
That is really shocking they didn’t at least pay the staff their already earned pay. Legal or not you’d hope people who run business like that got banned from running a business for a few years or fined.
Anyone that does wouldn't be very smart. They are MDM and serial tracked devicesI wonder how many employees are going to walk out the door with MacBook Pro's in leiu of the paycheck they were expecting.
I wonder how many employees are going to walk out the door with MacBook Pro's in leiu of the paycheck they were expecting.
There are times when investors are lured into businesses destined to fail. Not all investors are rich. Some are just regular people who invest their lifetime savings hoping to gain something extra. These people are not rich enough to pay an attorney to investigate what happened to their money. They are just victims. One of my clients fell as victim of one of these "Entrepreneurs", lost $50,000.00. The rest also lost their money, spent in trips and expenses that didn't justify, and maintaining the business at a level that seemed to be succeeding when in fact was simply stuck at a middle point. Money ran out, and company went bankrupt.The investors gambled money and lost, I don't feel sorry for them at all. Employees didn't knowingly gamble, they're the ones hurt through no fault of their own.
Hopefully none, as anyone who does that would be accused of stealing.I wonder how many employees are going to walk out the door with MacBook Pro's in leiu of the paycheck they were expecting.
The reference to Wuhan explains the date he cited. Also, it is a fact.That he felt compelled to specify that the pandemic began "in Wuhan, China" is...interesting.
I mean, everyone knows where the pandemic began. How is its origin point relevant to this bankruptcy? Its existence? Sure! But its origin?
Weird.
Yeah, I never liked 3rd party stores or 3rd party "Authorized Apple Dealers" or "Authorized Repair Centers".These little Mac stores are screwing people on prices of older Macs anyway. I remember in 2011 before I knew better, buying an 05 Powermac G5 (I thought it was the same thing as the MP) at Simply Max for $700 and it was the 1.8GHz
I normally wouldn't advocate stealing under any circumstance but I'll make an exception here. As others have pointed out, there is no way that company management didn't see this coming. They chose to steal from a bunch of twenty-year olds and refer them to the legal system for recourse. That's the highest order BS.Hopefully none, as anyone who does that would be accused of stealing.
Unfortunately, as a publicly traded company they can’t disclose such information until all regulatory requirements are covered. It’s quite possible they were attempting to acquire additional funding to stave off this eventuality but could not do so. To make a announcement even internally would have created an insider trading environment in violation of federal and state laws.TERRIBLE that they didn’t shut down two weeks ago so employees could get a final paycheck. Now you’ve got 1000’s of people who just gave up two weeks of their own lives working for free for a company that KNEW they were going under well in advance.
Terrible terrible CEO.
Do insider trading rules prevent a company from shutting down while it still has funds to pay their employees?Unfortunately, as a publicly traded company they can’t disclose such information until all regulatory requirements are covered. It’s quite possible they were attempting to acquire additional funding to stave off this eventuality but could not do so. To make a announcement even internally would have created an insider trading environment in violation of federal and state laws.
Unfortunately, as a publicly traded company they can’t disclose such information until all regulatory requirements are covered. It’s quite possible they were attempting to acquire additional funding to stave off this eventuality but could not do so. To make a announcement even internally would have created an insider trading environment in violation of federal and state laws.
Do insider trading rules prevent a company from shutting down while it still has funds to pay their employees?