First they slow down which some people would call unusable. We will see where the class action lawsuits will go...So, “undisturbed possession” speaks to the physical possession of the goods. Nothing more.
Second, Apple makes no “extra promises” about performance. Quite the contrary if you read their TOS. They do not warrant the experience, or make extra promises.
Care to clarify how either of these apply to this situation?
[doublepost=1515252865][/doublepost]
How’s it ridiculous? You may not like it, but if someone OWNS something, by definition, they have control over that thing. You agreed to this when you activated your phone with their OS. Go read your TOS.
Just because you don’t like how it’s being handled doesn’t mean you have a legal right to have it your way. You have the right to go buy something else. That’s it.
Second they promote their new iPhones being x-times faster than the old one. Which is only the case for the shipped iOS version.
Third they own the source code true, but they can not change it in that extend which makes a product unusable.
And this applies to all products. That's why it was right to punish VW for cheating with their motor control software. Which is also owned by VW and not the buyer of the car...
Last edited: