Do not forget, ultra/pro and for just $19.99 per month.Will it be called SiriGPT? Though since Apple loves using + and Pro/Ultra, maybe Siri+, Siri Pro, or Siri Ultra?
Just imagining virtual assistant Tim Cook:I can’t imagine Apple letting users customize the personality of their AI Assistants.
It would be more likely that we all end up with an AI with Tim Cook’s personality.![]()
Just late? I mean, it's like go to work on Monday but arrive next FridayAs usual, fashionably late to the party. Only hope is that it's not based on Siri.
Hope they don’t also differentiate Siri…Will it be called SiriGPT? Though since Apple loves using + and Pro/Ultra, maybe Siri+, Siri Pro, or Siri Ultra?
Clearly you haven't used Apple Maps recently.How are they going to come up with anything remotely resembling AI if they cannot get the basics right?I am rooting for Apple but Siri is a complete mess.
View attachment 2298500
For Apple building a generative AI feels a bit like Apple trying to compete with Google Maps with their very own Apple Maps. Despite their efforts Google Maps is and probably always will be light years ahead.
Is it $20 or $30 a month?Have you guys tried the new chatGPT voice assistant mode with the iphone 15s action button? This is truly mindblowing. It this could access the web and smart home devices and was a bit faster to respond, this is it. This is the startrek computer we've been waiting for!!
I am sorry that you clearly do not get the point. Good luck for the next timeClearly you haven't used Apple Maps recently.
Also I'm wondering who needs Siri or AI to know which software version their phone is running ? 🤣
I hope they don’t phase out the Siri Brand (not technology, that can go away). It’s already too iconic and infamous to be deleted, so i think they should just adopt brand new, useful and reliable technology and call it Siri. I believe a complete overhaul it’s more impressive than a brand new product.The fact that Siri has had virtually zero iterative updates tells me they’re working on a completely separate and new AI assistant, as opposed to improving their existingmoronoffering.
Apple is not known to hurry; they take their time and get it right.
I have no doubt their implementation of an AI assistant will be spectacular for average consumers (not likely for business), when it’s eventually ready.
The question is: How many people will have already left by then, having moved-on to other ecosystems that have AI assistants now? And we all know how difficult it is to get out once you’re entrenched in ecosystem…
(Re-post from another thread)
We want??? surely you're speaking for yourself, not "We"I think AI is a different kettle of fish. It klearns best when it has as braod an input as possible. The stance that Apple appears to take with on device processing/privacy will surely hold them back.
Personally I think we have to give up some degree of privacy up to get what we want. Lots seem to say "Oh no I'll immediately switch all that data mining off, which is fine for them, and it works becaisue luckily for them others leave their personal info up for grabs. They system learns more becasue it has access to demographics and it benefits them.
Yes, but the problem is in the ways it can fail. One good example id a failure is to ask for a biogrphy of George Washington's youngest grandchild Sara. The AI will give a brief summary even though we know GW never have any children. I think someone also got a summary of Beethoven's 11th Symphony too. These famous errors are likey fixed by now but there could be MANY more waiting to happen. ... Perhaps I could ask GPT-Siri why you stopped killing and eating small children.Have you guys tried the new chatGPT voice assistant mode with the iphone 15s action button? This is truly mindblowing. It this could access the web and smart home devices and was a bit faster to respond, this is it. This is the startrek computer we've been waiting for!!
Not really interested in more connected services, paid or not. Wonder if a pared down version could just run locally?
I guarantee that if Apple wants to just make its own ChatGPT alternative and is starting right now, it will be hopelessly behind the times next year when iOS 18 rolls around. AI advancements have been happening at such an extreme pace that it's hard to believe how rudimentary things were only a year ago and how many well-known tools didn't exist then. Apple needs some vision for where things are headed and aim there, rather than just looking at where things are now. I'm not sure Apple is that agile anymore.
It’s more like you don’t get the point. 🤦♂️🙄I am sorry that you clearly do not get the point. Good luck for the next time![]()
No. Apple also hates using terms other have popularized, so GPT, which is also in no way descriptive, is not going to be used. Likely they will just incorporate it into Siri, and continue that branding.Will it be called SiriGPT? Though since Apple loves using + and Pro/Ultra, maybe Siri+, Siri Pro, or Siri Ultra?
Is Ultron an option?Will it be called SiriGPT? Though since Apple loves using + and Pro/Ultra, maybe Siri+, Siri Pro, or Siri Ultra?
LOL or I found stuff on the WebLarge language models would create a whole lot of different ways to say "I don't know what you mean by _______. Here's what I found on the web for _________." Synonyms for words in those lines are abundant and there are many ways to restate the same confusion.![]()
Who says they haven’t been test something? From my understanding they been doing a lot of work with AI and Machine Learning.By iOS 18 it's too late.
Also a big mess up by apple who have had Siri data for years and not using that massive database of information to start testing something
yeah I think it's in the paid version. But give it a try just for fun!Is it $20 or $30 a month?