They broke the phone...
How can you come up with that conclusion?
No one takes responsibility for anything anymore. The phone had water damage exactly where the Taptic Engine is... exactly the component that failed.
They broke the phone...
No one takes responsibility for anything anymore. The phone had water damage exactly where the Taptic Engine is... exactly the component that failed.
It was working before Apple looked at it and wasn't afterward...How can you come up with that conclusion?
No one takes responsibility for anything anymore. The phone had water damage exactly where the Taptic Engine is... exactly the component that failed.
It was working before Apple looked at it and wasn't afterward...
Maybe it could have happened at any time, maybe it couldn't have, the part that maters is when it actually do, and that happened right at the time when Apple took it apart and then put it together. Unfortunately since that wasn't discovered until later after the device left the store it would be down to them believing the customer vs. the simplicity of using a policy that they can't know for sure that it happened after their work on it and therefore per that policy there's nothing that they need to do.yes and there was water damage to that component, meaning it was going to fail at any given moment... just so happened that it stopped working right when apple gave it back.
like i said apple has no reason NOT to help its customers out.
yes and there was water damage to that component, meaning it was going to fail at any given moment... just so happened that it stopped working right when apple gave it back.
like i said apple has no reason NOT to help its customers out.
Guess who is the only authorized tester of Apple products.In that case the phone should be tested by an authorised tester to determine whether the rust on the component caused it to fail. You can’t assume a component has failed because of something until it’s tested properly. It could well have been surface rust. The fact the component stopped working once Apple had exposed it via taking the iPhone apart puts the onus on them to offer to repair it.
Apple have been caught very recently in undercover tests trying to suggest full replacements of MacBooks due to repair bills running into the thousands when the actual fix has been a few dollars. If employees work on commission then it can open up the possibility of corrupting what is usually excellent customer service.
This has hardly resulted into anything meaningful ever. You seriously think Apple is worried about one lawsuit from a customer who can't prove anything at all?! Apple won against Samsung FFS.Why don't you tell the manager you'll file a lawsuit if they don't give you the working phone you first gave them?
Yes, this is a much better solution and might get to some positive result.It sucks. I’d drop the executive team an email or Tim himself!
Actually I’m in Canada
We honestly don’t know where the water damage came from, but if you would like to place that on us you can.
Now, considering neither party knew the phone was in such a condition, the fact that it broke while in their possession, opening and closing the device, puts that on them.
I know that they have to open it to inspect and replace the battery, by accepting it from us they assumed that responsibility. I’m not allowed to personally open it before taking to them for ensuring no damage.
Called Apple for the third time today and they were more interested in helping. CR setup another appointment at the store for a replacement, will update if that goes through as planned!
Guess who is the only authorized tester of Apple products.
Not Apple per se, but the manager. For him it's easier and faster to just fix or replace the device they broke than having to go through all of the burdens of a legal dispute even if they'd win.This has hardly resulted into anything meaningful ever. You seriously think Apple is worried about one lawsuit from a customer who can't prove anything at all?! Apple won against Samsung FFS.
Not Apple per se, but the manager. For him it's easier and faster to just fix or replace the device they broke than having to go through all of the burdens of a legal dispute even if they'd win.
They do give the store managers (and even Geniuses) a lot of latitude when it comes to out of warranty replacements / repairs. I know this for a fact.Just because he’s a manager he can’t do whatever he feels like going against the company policy. Everyone has a limit of what they can or can’t do. I’m sure he’s not doing that just to piss people off.
They do give the store managers (and even Geniuses) a lot of latitude when it comes to out of warranty replacements / repairs. I know this for a fact.
yes and there was water damage to that component, meaning it was going to fail at any given moment... just so happened that it stopped working right when apple gave it back..
It's a water resistant phone, if the water entered only at taptic engine area, then the phone was poorly manufactured and didnt work as advertised, since the seal failed in a localized area - because the sim tray triggers *immediately*...If you had liquid damage, it is possible that yes whilst it was in the hands of Apple the taptic engine broke. So no Apple did not break your iPhone.
they likely damaged it inadvertently.
Can someone explain to me how the hell can "water damage" happen only to taptic engine on a water resistant phone? Give me a break. If there was rust next to taptic engine https://d3nevzfk7ii3be.cloudfront.net/igi/IUS6g5AbGBMRcPRt.huge , water indicator would have tripped already...
[doublepost=1544743422][/doublepost]
It's a water resistant phone, if the water entered only at taptic engine area, then the phone was poorly manufactured and didnt work as advertised, since the seal failed in a localized area - because the sim tray triggers *immediately*...
That’s not how seals work. There have been some QC issues with iPhone 8 - some are not as water resistant as advertised.again, what benefit does apple have in damaging something and not fixing it?
[doublepost=1544748603][/doublepost]
too many factors:
seals can break/get weaker when you:
- drop a phone
- put it near water
something that is water resistant simply won't be water resistant forever. go and stomp your feet as much as you want but apple is only a company, they aren't god and can't defy physics.
the taptic engine is close to the bottom, seems like the phone was exposed to enough water from the bottom to break a seal and form rust. the component was going to fail at some point and it unfortunately failed at the wrong time.
apple is not responsible for water damage.
THAT BEING SAID...
given apple's track record in terms of satisfying it's customers at the genius bar, i hope OP is able to get a new phone or have it fixed.. however, at the end of the day if they don't then i completely understand their position on this.
whilst it was in the hands of Apple the taptic engine broke.
So no Apple did not break your iPhone.
That’s not how seals work. There have been some QC issues with iPhone 8 - some are not as water resistant as advertised.
But people generally do not submerge them
It's a somewhat interesting juxtaposition...
Those two phrases are the salient ones relating to it all.Thanks for removing the rest of my post.
Can someone explain to me how the hell can "water damage" happen only to taptic engine on a water resistant phone? Give me a break.