Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Ebok

Suspended
Aug 22, 2018
457
672
They broke the phone...

How can you come up with that conclusion?

No one takes responsibility for anything anymore. The phone had water damage exactly where the Taptic Engine is... exactly the component that failed.
 

44267547

Cancelled
Jul 12, 2016
37,642
42,495
No one takes responsibility for anything anymore. The phone had water damage exactly where the Taptic Engine is... exactly the component that failed.

Perhaps re-read the previous posts. Considering that the taptic engine was _not_ working when The customer left the store, and that doesn’t appear highly coincidental to you after they inspected it? How about, Apple likely damaged the taptic engine inadvertently , that’s exactly why they likely will replace the phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stafil

C DM

macrumors Sandy Bridge
Oct 17, 2011
51,392
19,461
How can you come up with that conclusion?

No one takes responsibility for anything anymore. The phone had water damage exactly where the Taptic Engine is... exactly the component that failed.
It was working before Apple looked at it and wasn't afterward...
 

Ebok

Suspended
Aug 22, 2018
457
672
It was working before Apple looked at it and wasn't afterward...

yes and there was water damage to that component, meaning it was going to fail at any given moment... just so happened that it stopped working right when apple gave it back.

like i said apple has no reason NOT to help its customers out.
 

C DM

macrumors Sandy Bridge
Oct 17, 2011
51,392
19,461
yes and there was water damage to that component, meaning it was going to fail at any given moment... just so happened that it stopped working right when apple gave it back.

like i said apple has no reason NOT to help its customers out.
Maybe it could have happened at any time, maybe it couldn't have, the part that maters is when it actually do, and that happened right at the time when Apple took it apart and then put it together. Unfortunately since that wasn't discovered until later after the device left the store it would be down to them believing the customer vs. the simplicity of using a policy that they can't know for sure that it happened after their work on it and therefore per that policy there's nothing that they need to do.
 

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
17,321
25,479
Wales, United Kingdom
The OP wouldn’t be the first this has happened to in terms of being told an iPhone has water damage. For some reason Apple refuse to physically prove to you the phone is damaged and feel it’s acceptable to tell you this and turn you away. They’ve been caught massively over quoting on Mac repairs too and I’m surprised these practices haven’t been shamed into disappearing by now, especially by a company as big as Apple.
 

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
17,321
25,479
Wales, United Kingdom
yes and there was water damage to that component, meaning it was going to fail at any given moment... just so happened that it stopped working right when apple gave it back.

like i said apple has no reason NOT to help its customers out.

In that case the phone should be tested by an authorised tester to determine whether the rust on the component caused it to fail. You can’t assume a component has failed because of something until it’s tested properly. It could well have been surface rust. The fact the component stopped working once Apple had exposed it via taking the iPhone apart puts the onus on them to offer to repair it.

Apple have been caught very recently in undercover tests trying to suggest full replacements of MacBooks due to repair bills running into the thousands when the actual fix has been a few dollars. If employees work on commission then it can open up the possibility of corrupting what is usually excellent customer service.
 

Superrjamz54

macrumors 6502
Dec 4, 2015
499
314
In that case the phone should be tested by an authorised tester to determine whether the rust on the component caused it to fail. You can’t assume a component has failed because of something until it’s tested properly. It could well have been surface rust. The fact the component stopped working once Apple had exposed it via taking the iPhone apart puts the onus on them to offer to repair it.

Apple have been caught very recently in undercover tests trying to suggest full replacements of MacBooks due to repair bills running into the thousands when the actual fix has been a few dollars. If employees work on commission then it can open up the possibility of corrupting what is usually excellent customer service.
Guess who is the only authorized tester of Apple products.
 

akash.nu

macrumors G4
May 26, 2016
10,870
16,998
Why don't you tell the manager you'll file a lawsuit if they don't give you the working phone you first gave them?
This has hardly resulted into anything meaningful ever. You seriously think Apple is worried about one lawsuit from a customer who can't prove anything at all?! Apple won against Samsung FFS.

It sucks. I’d drop the executive team an email or Tim himself!
Yes, this is a much better solution and might get to some positive result.
Actually I’m in Canada :)

We honestly don’t know where the water damage came from, but if you would like to place that on us you can.

Now, considering neither party knew the phone was in such a condition, the fact that it broke while in their possession, opening and closing the device, puts that on them.

I know that they have to open it to inspect and replace the battery, by accepting it from us they assumed that responsibility. I’m not allowed to personally open it before taking to them for ensuring no damage.

Called Apple for the third time today and they were more interested in helping. CR setup another appointment at the store for a replacement, will update if that goes through as planned!

They did not assume any responsibility if your phone was already damaged. That is also clearly mentioned on the work schedule. But rather than listening to people who is suggesting you to try and sue Apple, you did the right thing by just trying to contact them and explain again. Good luck.
 
Last edited:

rafark

macrumors 68000
Sep 1, 2017
1,841
3,223
This has hardly resulted into anything meaningful ever. You seriously think Apple is worried about one lawsuit from a customer who can't prove anything at all?! Apple won against Samsung FFS.
Not Apple per se, but the manager. For him it's easier and faster to just fix or replace the device they broke than having to go through all of the burdens of a legal dispute even if they'd win.
 

akash.nu

macrumors G4
May 26, 2016
10,870
16,998
Not Apple per se, but the manager. For him it's easier and faster to just fix or replace the device they broke than having to go through all of the burdens of a legal dispute even if they'd win.

Just because he’s a manager he can’t do whatever he feels like going against the company policy. Everyone has a limit of what they can or can’t do. I’m sure he’s not doing that just to piss people off.
 

flashflooder

macrumors 6502
Oct 14, 2011
420
198
Just because he’s a manager he can’t do whatever he feels like going against the company policy. Everyone has a limit of what they can or can’t do. I’m sure he’s not doing that just to piss people off.
They do give the store managers (and even Geniuses) a lot of latitude when it comes to out of warranty replacements / repairs. I know this for a fact.
 

akash.nu

macrumors G4
May 26, 2016
10,870
16,998
They do give the store managers (and even Geniuses) a lot of latitude when it comes to out of warranty replacements / repairs. I know this for a fact.

Yes they do but I’m sure there’s a limit of what people can do and as with any retail business, everything is monitored and accounted for. We don’t know what situation the manager / genius was in. This is only one side of the story.
 

44267547

Cancelled
Jul 12, 2016
37,642
42,495
yes and there was water damage to that component, meaning it was going to fail at any given moment... just so happened that it stopped working right when apple gave it back..

Aside from the water damage, You’re just making assumptions. We know that there was water indicated, but Apple would never treat the situation like all of a ‘sudden the taptic engine stopped working’ once they gave it back to the customer. You said that the ‘Taptic engine could fail at any given moment’, but it was working perfectly when the OP brought it into the store and all of a sudden it stopped working when They gave it back to him? I’m not buying your argument that the taptic engine failed when the OP brought into the store once Apple inspected it, they likely damaged it inadvertently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ploki and stafil

alphaod

macrumors Core
Feb 9, 2008
22,183
1,245
NYC
If you had liquid damage, it is possible that yes whilst it was in the hands of Apple the taptic engine broke. So no Apple did not break your iPhone.
 

Ploki

macrumors 601
Jan 21, 2008
4,325
1,560
Can someone explain to me how the hell can "water damage" happen only to taptic engine on a water resistant phone? Give me a break. If there was rust next to taptic engine https://d3nevzfk7ii3be.cloudfront.net/igi/IUS6g5AbGBMRcPRt.huge , water indicator would have tripped already...
[doublepost=1544743422][/doublepost]
If you had liquid damage, it is possible that yes whilst it was in the hands of Apple the taptic engine broke. So no Apple did not break your iPhone.
It's a water resistant phone, if the water entered only at taptic engine area, then the phone was poorly manufactured and didnt work as advertised, since the seal failed in a localized area - because the sim tray triggers *immediately*...
 

Ebok

Suspended
Aug 22, 2018
457
672
they likely damaged it inadvertently.

again, what benefit does apple have in damaging something and not fixing it?
[doublepost=1544748603][/doublepost]
Can someone explain to me how the hell can "water damage" happen only to taptic engine on a water resistant phone? Give me a break. If there was rust next to taptic engine https://d3nevzfk7ii3be.cloudfront.net/igi/IUS6g5AbGBMRcPRt.huge , water indicator would have tripped already...
[doublepost=1544743422][/doublepost]
It's a water resistant phone, if the water entered only at taptic engine area, then the phone was poorly manufactured and didnt work as advertised, since the seal failed in a localized area - because the sim tray triggers *immediately*...


too many factors:

seals can break/get weaker when you:
- drop a phone
- put it near water

something that is water resistant simply won't be water resistant forever. go and stomp your feet as much as you want but apple is only a company, they aren't god and can't defy physics.

the taptic engine is close to the bottom, seems like the phone was exposed to enough water from the bottom to break a seal and form rust. the component was going to fail at some point and it unfortunately failed at the wrong time.

apple is not responsible for water damage.



THAT BEING SAID...
given apple's track record in terms of satisfying it's customers at the genius bar, i hope OP is able to get a new phone or have it fixed.. however, at the end of the day if they don't then i completely understand their position on this.
 

Ploki

macrumors 601
Jan 21, 2008
4,325
1,560
again, what benefit does apple have in damaging something and not fixing it?
[doublepost=1544748603][/doublepost]


too many factors:

seals can break/get weaker when you:
- drop a phone
- put it near water

something that is water resistant simply won't be water resistant forever. go and stomp your feet as much as you want but apple is only a company, they aren't god and can't defy physics.

the taptic engine is close to the bottom, seems like the phone was exposed to enough water from the bottom to break a seal and form rust. the component was going to fail at some point and it unfortunately failed at the wrong time.

apple is not responsible for water damage.



THAT BEING SAID...
given apple's track record in terms of satisfying it's customers at the genius bar, i hope OP is able to get a new phone or have it fixed.. however, at the end of the day if they don't then i completely understand their position on this.
That’s not how seals work. There have been some QC issues with iPhone 8 - some are not as water resistant as advertised.
But people generally do not submerge them
 

Ebok

Suspended
Aug 22, 2018
457
672
That’s not how seals work. There have been some QC issues with iPhone 8 - some are not as water resistant as advertised.
But people generally do not submerge them

Seals degrade over time.

QC issues according to who? Random internet posts?
 

JPack

macrumors G5
Mar 27, 2017
13,568
26,266
Can someone explain to me how the hell can "water damage" happen only to taptic engine on a water resistant phone? Give me a break.

The bottom of the phone has a barometric vent. That vent leads directly to the Taptic Engine.
 

jhearty99

macrumors 6502a
Sep 17, 2012
524
549
Long Island, NY
Probably not relevant, but I brought my iPhone X in last weekend to have the battery replaced voluntarily. Got home after picking up the phone and the Taptic Engine was broken. Brought it back and they ended up having to replace it. It is possible someone messed up working on it, just saying.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.