Thanks, wasn't talk to you.Move on.The title of the story (thread) here is Apple Stores Now Stock 14-Inch M3 MacBook Pro With 16GB of RAM
Thanks, wasn't talk to you.Move on.The title of the story (thread) here is Apple Stores Now Stock 14-Inch M3 MacBook Pro With 16GB of RAM
Didn't you know that before you bought a 16 GB machine for coding/development?I'm surprised by how some people can really work on just a 8GB of RAM.
Despite using a budget-friendly MacBook Pro M1 for my work, which involves running applications like Xcode, Safari, ChatGTP, Slack, SourceTree, and a couple of others, I don't have an excessive number of Safari tabs open—just a few for tasks like accessing App Store Connect or browsing GitHub and Stack Overflow.
Yet, I'm facing significant lagging issues with everything, which indicates a need for an additional 10-12GB of RAM just to meet regular requirements.
For any new Apple machine, I would never settle for 16GB; the minimum should be 32GB!
Essentially, the amount of swap being used indicates that the current amount is insufficient.
View attachment 2356113
I'm surprised by how some people can really work on just a 8GB of RAM.
Despite using a budget-friendly MacBook Pro M1 for my work, which involves running applications like Xcode, Safari, ChatGTP, Slack, SourceTree, and a couple of others, I don't have an excessive number of Safari tabs open—just a few for tasks like accessing App Store Connect or browsing GitHub and Stack Overflow.
Yet, I'm facing significant lagging issues with everything, which indicates a need for an additional 10-12GB of RAM just to meet regular requirements.
For any new Apple machine, I would never settle for 16GB; the minimum should be 32GB!
Essentially, the amount of swap being used indicates that the current amount is insufficient.
View attachment 2356113
It's time for Apple to make upgrading memory, storage, and wifi more accessible to end users. It's pretty ridiculous to have to replace the entire machine to accomplish this, but great for landfills.
That's what I worry about. The base Mac Studio along with the prior base 14" MacBook Pro were the absolute best values ever. It was easy. Now it's a mess I don't even want to dive into.Oh yeah totally forgot about the Mac Studio, no way the base the config stays at $1999 for 32GB of RAM and an M3 Max?
This. This drove me crazy.Apple Silicon was an opportunity to change from the times when Apple was selling 5400 RPM HDDs in new entry-level 4K iMacs. I was flabbergasted at how slow those things ran. But Tim Cook’s Apple will always be Tim Cook’s Apple.
Main reason why I sold my organs (metaphorically speaking) to spec my mac studio with 128GB of Ram.I'm surprised by how some people can really work on just a 8GB of RAM.
Despite using a budget-friendly MacBook Pro M1 for my work, which involves running applications like Xcode, Safari, ChatGTP, Slack, SourceTree, and a couple of others, I don't have an excessive number of Safari tabs open—just a few for tasks like accessing App Store Connect or browsing GitHub and Stack Overflow.
Yet, I'm facing significant lagging issues with everything, which indicates a need for an additional 10-12GB of RAM just to meet regular requirements.
For any new Apple machine, I would never settle for 16GB; the minimum should be 32GB!
Essentially, the amount of swap being used indicates that the current amount is insufficient.
View attachment 2356113
Find out the trade in value at https://www.apple.com/shop/trade-in and compare it to Decluttr and others.I have an Apple MacBook Pro 13" Space Gray with the M1 chip (16 GB of storage) and I am contemplating trading it in for one of the new M3 MacBook Air. Would Apple give me a good trade-in amount? Or should I go with Decluttr? TIA.
I tend to agree. One of the things that really worries me about the small amount of RAM offered on entry level Macs is the problem caused by excessive swapping and the effect on SSD life. Not much discussed but apart from the lag caused by disc swapping (albeit reduced by using a unified memory/ssd design), the issue also causes SSDs to wear out as they have a finite read/write life. So all those 8GB machines are going to suffer from SSD issues as they get older. I have not done the work to calculate the effect but it is not going to be insignificant. Older 8GB machines are going to have serious issues with SSD performance due to the excessive disc swapping taking place. And those SSDs are not replaceable. Another reason to avoid machines with 8GB RAM.I'm surprised by how some people can really work on just a 8GB of RAM.
Despite using a budget-friendly MacBook Pro M1 for my work, which involves running applications like Xcode, Safari, ChatGTP, Slack, SourceTree, and a couple of others, I don't have an excessive number of Safari tabs open—just a few for tasks like accessing App Store Connect or browsing GitHub and Stack Overflow.
Yet, I'm facing significant lagging issues with everything, which indicates a need for an additional 10-12GB of RAM just to meet regular requirements.
For any new Apple machine, I would never settle for 16GB; the minimum should be 32GB!
Essentially, the amount of swap being used indicates that the current amount is insufficient.
View attachment 2356113
I have an Apple MacBook Pro 13" Space Gray with the M1 chip (16 GB of storage) and I am contemplating trading it in for one of the new M3 MacBook Air. Would Apple give me a good trade-in amount? Or should I go with Decluttr? TIA.
I'm surprised by how some people can really work on just a 8GB of RAM.
Despite using a budget-friendly MacBook Pro M1 for my work, which involves running applications like Xcode, Safari, ChatGTP, Slack, SourceTree, and a couple of others, I don't have an excessive number of Safari tabs open—just a few for tasks like accessing App Store Connect or browsing GitHub and Stack Overflow.
Yet, I'm facing significant lagging issues with everything, which indicates a need for an additional 10-12GB of RAM just to meet regular requirements.
For any new Apple machine, I would never settle for 16GB; the minimum should be 32GB!
Essentially, the amount of swap being used indicates that the current amount is insufficient.
View attachment 2356113
I tend to agree. One of the things that really worries me about the small amount of RAM offered on entry level Macs is the problem caused by excessive swapping and the effect on SSD life. Not much discussed but apart from the lag caused by disc swapping (albeit reduced by using a unified memory/ssd design), the issue also causes SSDs to wear out as they have a finite read/write life. So all those 8GB machines are going to suffer from SSD issues as they get older. I have not done the work to calculate the effect but it is not going to be insignificant. Older 8GB machines are going to have serious issues with SSD performance due to the excessive disc swapping taking place. And those SSDs are not replaceable. Another reason to avoid machines with 8GB RAM.
This is the base M3 model that replaced the remaining the 13” MBP with the touchbar, the 14” M3 Pro MBP starts with 16GB but the 14” M3 MBP starts at 8Didn't the M1 Pro MacBook Pro 14inch already start at 16 GB ram and 512GB? I swear I picked the base configuration and I have 16 GB of ram. Did they go back to 8 Gb on M2+?? Courage
I previously worked at a Mac dealer which would order BTO models to sell. It was quite a long time ago and this may have changed since I worked there (doubtful, given Apple's aggressive push to promote their own stores).Third party vendors could have stocked BTO configs any time they wanted - deluxe vendors like B&H and Adorama do. But places like Best Buy have to limit the SKUs they stock in their stores for obvious reasons so they typically only stock the standard configs, so this is a good move for those retailers.
Microsoft already do. Most of the major developments of their MS 365 products (including Office stalwarts like Excel, Outlook, Word, etc.) are being done in the web versions of those products. "New" Outlook is pretty much the web version. Excel and Word are being improved constantly and the web versions will eventually reach feature parity with the desktop versions. All new O365 products and re-writes of existing products (Loop, Teams, Project) are already pretty much web products. All of their Dynamics products that are not being sunset (ie, CRM, NAV, AX) have been re-designed as web products (Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sales, Finance, Operations).Wish sw makers like Microsoft, Adobe and others starts to sell sw for linux.... Apple would be in big trouble on MacOS and it's upgradeability ..
Not everyone knows everything about their future requirements at the time they are buying a computer. On top of that, Apple's own messaging suggests that 8GB should be "equivalent" to 16GB in the Wintel world. It's pretty unhelpful to dismiss someone with a "you should have known" attitude when they make a purchase decision based on the information provided to them by the vendor only to find out that the vendor isn't being completely honest with them.Didn't you know that before you bought a 16 GB machine for coding/development?
16GB should have been the minimum spec for anything labelled as "Pro" for at least five years now.I personally think 16 GB should be the minimum spec for the Macbook Pro. At the current base price of the 8 GB model. Especially since these machines are not easily upgradable.
It's time for Apple to make upgrading memory, storage, and wifi more accessible to end users. It's pretty ridiculous to have to replace the entire machine to accomplish this, but great for landfills.
SSDs and Batteries are parts that should be considered consumables and should be user-replacable. Yet another area where the EU is probably going to be ahead of the rest of the world on forcing companies' hands to return device ownership back to device owners.Had that same thought watching a @dosdude1 video of extensive "surgery" on an M1 Mac Mini just to upgrade the SSD, which is a component that should be socketed and use NVMe and be user accessible.