You know... Am I the only one who doesn't read these license agreements? I mean who really cares.
Indeed.
You know... Am I the only one who doesn't read these license agreements? I mean who really cares.
You know... Am I the only one who doesn't read these license agreements? I mean who really cares.
once leopard is released bootcamp 1.4's license will expire, so you can't use the bootcamp assistant to remove the partition. You can either purchase leopard, or (if you've got a full backup) repartition your HD which will erase all data, and then reinstall via backup.
I make fairly regular backups with SuperDuper! just to be safe and i understand that bootcamp is not free and that it was clearly stated in the license agreement that it was beta and for a limited time only. Thats fair enough. But to be forced to reformat the drive and reinstall everything when there was a simple and pain free solution with the bootcamp assistant, i think, is being deliberately awkward. I could understand Apple restricting from any further installs via bootcamp but to force people to go to such efforts to remove it is unnecessary IMO.
C) (MAYBE) You won't be able to restore your Mac's Hard drive partition back as one. With out reforming your hard drive and re-installing every thing
You are absolutely right in your thinking. Since it's obvious you are like a few others, you have no intention of using your Mac as a real Mac but rather use it as a pseudo Windows machine then get the Dell outta here.
First of all you don't know **** about my computing situation and my business decisions. Therefore you should not dare to comment on my intentions. But let me enlighten you.
Sorry but I just don't see a point in buying a Macintosh just to run Windows only as you do.
Microsoft makes their tools and APIs mostly backward compatible so why doesn't Apple at least make an attempt to do the same making easier on 3rd party developers.
do you know that setting the system date back will work, have you tried it?
I don't know how to use CLI (most people probably don't) is Apple suggesting we should?
Sorry but i still think its deliberately awkward.
Have you SEEN Windows?
I've seen others propose this in the past and it really represents a misunderstanding of the security problems with Microsoft's NT family of operating systems. Vulnerabilities in the kernel itself are rare and really no more frequent than in other kernels.My wife and I were talking about Vista yesterday (it's an IT nightmare for her) and we thought that what microsoft SHOULD have done when they developed Vista, is build it from scratch on a Unix kernel (why not, they've had five years)...