Not really, you're still defending patent infringement with some pretty weak arguments.it was an analogy. I edited to give a better one anyways.
Not really, you're still defending patent infringement with some pretty weak arguments.it was an analogy. I edited to give a better one anyways.
I find it super hilarious the same people who want Apple to fall are complaining about not being able to service existing customers.
That’s great news, Tim.Apple will find a better way to do it![]()
Pretty sure he's trolling.Not sure who you're talking about, but I'm not "rooting for Apple to fall"
I'm rooting for Apple to be held to account for the IP they are using while not properly compensating the rights holders.
If the situation were reversed, Apple would sue the infringer INTO THE GROUND
They need to play by the rules here
Money is the root of all evilGreed is the downfall of humanity.
Definitely not a patent troll case. Masimo produces and sells medical products. Patent trolls are entities that purchase and hold patent portfolios with the intention of engaging in litigation.
There they go! Now you see them, now you don't!
Money is the root of all evil
Yes. Masimo manufactures patient monitoring devices.Did they actually do anything with their „invention“ as the patent holder or does it simply exist to make money off of it (licenses)? If they don’t, it should be revoked after x years. It’s weird
You spelled stupidity wrong.Greed is the downfall of humanity.
Nah. Just buy them up, take the IP, and boot everyone in the company.Good
Stop stealing IP Apple
At this point they kind of earned it. Apple played fast and loose and now everyone knows Apple does not have any cards left and can not do much to stop it.I guess at this point it’s about finding a fair agreement. I would assume the patent holder would try to get an outrageous amount of money out of this.
Where are you getting your alternate reality news from? Fox??Im not sure where winning the court case comes in since it was declared a mistrial and 6 out of the 7 jury members sided with apple. This will be appealed and who knows what happens then.
Which probably will take a few weeks so that’s your option for a post-Christmas gift if you want to gift yourself with a S9 or U2.But retailers like Best Buy, Amazon, Target, B&H can still sell them until their inventory runs out.
Because that was a feature of the product. Imagine buying a product and then the company disables the very feature that prompted you to buy that product.Why not just disable the functionality on the software side until they can find another way.
That would result in a lawsuit from current watch owners, though. Disabling an existing feature would invite a class-action.Why not just disable the functionality on the software side until they can find another way.