Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

A_Flying_Panda

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2017
187
94
The problem is you clearly have never dealt with Assurant. It is a garbage company that does everything possible to get you the cheapest junk "replacements" that they can find.

I am extremely disappointed that I will NOT be dealing with Apple should I have to make this kind of claim, and instead am being directed to a third party company with a terrible reputation. Apple is a trillion dollar company... and they need to outsource part of AppleCare to a lowest bidder operation?

Just wait until you have to deal with Assurant.... it's going to be a fun time.....

Obviously you are very upset and it has clouded your judgement.
 

Breezygirl

macrumors 6502a
Oct 7, 2011
660
506
1. The ToS says the plan only ends when it expires, or you cancel. It does not say anywhere a single replacement will end the plan.

2. It’s the same practice as standard Applecare+, they replace your phone and the new warranty carries over.
[doublepost=1536895461][/doublepost]

Apple is NOT a insurance company. It can not approve claims. There is a mountain of legal issue here. Like apple do not have the manpower to investigate every claim, apple do not have the algorithm in the backend to approve claims.

Your logic is the same as asking “why don’t Apple manufacture their devices themselves”, “why do they have to use Foxconn to make their phones, other than the reason to cut costs”. ‘Why don’t apple deliver their products themselves, why use ups and fedex’
But does it clearly states it covers replacement phones? I’d be concerned if it doesn’t
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1144557

Xstamper22

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Sep 13, 2018
11
7
Sorry, I am not buying it. "Apple is not an insurance company" Not for a trillion dollar company. Nope. They have a legal army at their disposal and could make this happen overnight.

Besides, AppleCare+ already provides what would be considered insurance services for damage. That is a type of insurance, so I am NOT BUYING THIS EXCUSE.
 

Breezygirl

macrumors 6502a
Oct 7, 2011
660
506
Obviously you are very upset and it has clouded your judgement.
Wow, very uncalled for. Xstamper22 is bringing up real concerns and very valid points and concerns.
[doublepost=1536895851][/doublepost]
The contract (https://assurantdeviceclaim.com/media/2168184/or-applecare-services.pdf) says that the replacement phone remains covered: "The original product becomes our property and the replacement product is your property, with coverage effective for the remaining period of the Plan Term."
Thank you.
 

Xstamper22

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Sep 13, 2018
11
7
The actual insurance contract (https://assurantdeviceclaim.com/media/2168184/or-applecare-services.pdf) claims that "
Apple has agreed with ASIC to be the exclusive provider of all services and replacement devices to you under AppleCare+ with Theft and Loss."

Doesn't that mean that Apple sends the device, not Assurant directly (or, at least, Apple provides the device to Assurant which provides it to you)?

No, what the means is that Apple entered into a contact with Assurant to be the sole company that will handle your AppleCare loss/theft issues. Assurant will be the sole provider of replacement devices AND "services" on the replacement device. So, it sounds like the replacement device will then fall under Assurant to provide any repairs/etc going forward.
 

A_Flying_Panda

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2017
187
94
But does it clearly states it covers replacement phones? I’d be concerned if it doesn’t
Sorry, I am not buying it. "Apple is not an insurance company" Not for a trillion dollar company. Nope. They have a legal army at their disposal and could make this happen overnight.

Besides, AppleCare+ already provides what would be considered insurance services for damage. That is a type of insurance, so I am NOT BUYING THIS EXCUSE.

The difference is with Applecare, you need to bring something to apple. You cannot just go in there and say, hey i lost my phone.
Every plan that covers ‘lost’ has to go to an insurance company, or can you name 1 company that covers lost and theft without going through insurance company?

Apple dose not own an insurance company.
[doublepost=1536896142][/doublepost]
No, what the means is that Apple entered into a contact with Assurant to be the sole company that will handle your AppleCare loss/theft issues. Assurant will be the sole provider of replacement devices AND "services" on the replacement device. So, it sounds like the replacement device will then fall under Assurant to provide any repairs/etc going forward.

The bottom line, you get a ‘cheapest junk’ from assurant, it doesn’t work. You go to apple store, say hey, i got this junk from your Applecare plan, and it doesn’t work now, replace it. Now it falls under Applecare category and you will get a replacement.
 

noteple

macrumors 68000
Aug 30, 2011
1,527
549
If you get a bum phone from assurant
Bring it into Apple and get it swapped out under AppleCare+
 

Xstamper22

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Sep 13, 2018
11
7
If you get a bum phone from assurant
Bring it into Apple and get it swapped out under AppleCare+

Guys, read the section of the contract that was quoted. Apple obviously thought of this. It says that ALL SERVICES for the replacement phone GO THROUGH ASSURANT. That means Apple thought of this loophole already. Once you get the replacement phone, the contract says Assurant becomes the sole company responsible for services on the phone.

Furthermore, even if they do allow this, this is contrary to the ENTIRE point of buying Apple - the premium experience. Now you will have to do a runaround between two companies? Furthermore, you will have to pay even MORE deductibles? So, you are paying $300 for AppleCare, then possibly $220+ for the loss, then possibly $100+ for fixing the replacement that came screwed up to begin with? Plus dealing with all the hassle and other BS that will entail? GTFO! Is this Apple, or the Boost Mobile customer service plan?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Breezygirl

tl01

macrumors 68020
Jun 20, 2010
2,350
649
The difference is with Applecare, you need to bring something to apple. You cannot just go in there and say, hey i lost my phone.
Every plan that covers ‘lost’ has to go to an insurance company, or can you name 1 company that covers lost and theft without going through insurance company?

Apple dose not own an insurance company.
[doublepost=1536896142][/doublepost]

The bottom line, you get a ‘cheapest junk’ from assurant, it doesn’t work. You go to apple store, say hey, i got this junk from your Applecare plan, and it doesn’t work now, replace it. Now it falls under Applecare category and you will get a replacement.
Exactly! If it is still covered by Apple care and it doesn’t work... you are all good! Get it replaced as defective!
 

Xstamper22

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Sep 13, 2018
11
7
Exactly! If it is still covered by Apple care and it doesn’t work... you are all good! Get it replaced as defective!

Yea bro... Great plan. So $300 for AppleCare, $250 for the lost phone, and then $100 for fixing the junk Assurant phone that will almost certainly be screwed up in some way. So when all is said and done, you just spent $650.
 

Lobwedgephil

macrumors 603
Apr 7, 2012
5,792
4,757
The problem is you clearly have never dealt with Assurant. It is a garbage company that does everything possible to get you the cheapest junk "replacements" that they can find. This is almost like Apple just said "Hey, when you come into the Apple Store with an issue, we will send you down the street to Bob's Computer Shop. He'll handle the issue from there. Don't bother us further with it."

This is tech outsourcing to the lowest bidder. Period. Apple is now sending us to a third party to resolve some issues that we are paying $300 in AppleCare for.

I am extremely disappointed that I will NOT be dealing with Apple should I have to make this kind of claim, and instead am being directed to a third party company with a terrible reputation. Apple is a trillion dollar company... and they need to outsource part of AppleCare to a lowest bidder operation?

Just wait until you have to deal with Assurant.... it's going to be a fun time.....

Why not just go to the Genius Bar? This appears to only be an issue for stolen/lost phones. And I hate Assurant, I will probably just stick to regular AppleCare, never lost or had a stolen phone.
 

rkulpajr

macrumors regular
Sep 27, 2007
115
27
Columbus, Ohio
Hey all. Someone States this earlier, bit no one paid attention. This is not the same company who provides repairs in the carrier stores. That is asurian. This is assurant. They are actually my renter insurance company through geico. I really think there is a difference.
 

A_Flying_Panda

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2017
187
94
Guys, read the section of the contract that was quoted. Apple obviously thought of this. It says that ALL SERVICES for the replacement phone GO THROUGH ASSURANT. That means Apple thought of this loophole already. Once you get the replacement phone, the contract says Assurant becomes the sole company responsible for services on the phone.

Furthermore, even if they do allow this, this is contrary to the ENTIRE point of buying Apple - the premium experience. Now you will have to do a runaround between two companies? Furthermore, you will have to pay even MORE deductibles? So, you are paying $300 for AppleCare, then possibly $220+ for the loss, then possibly $100+ for fixing the replacement that came screwed up to begin with? Plus dealing with all the hassle and other BS that will entail? GTFO! Is this Apple, or the Boost Mobile customer service plan?

Please, read the entire contract yourself, don’t just read part of it.

Here i give you two quotes.
1.
Important: Neither you nor anyone entrusted with the Covered Device shall open the Covered Device as damage caused by opening the equipment is not covered by this Plan. Only an Apple authorized servicer should perform service on the Covered Device. Opening the Covered Device, or permitting an unauthorized servicer to open the Covered Device, constitutes intentional damage to Covered Device and compromises its physical integrity, and any subsequent damages to the device will be deemed a consequence of such impermissible actions, and not covered by this Plan.
Meaning if assurant is sending you a phone they did the work themselves, they are apple authorized.

2.
Carry-in service. Carry-in service is available for most Covered Devices. Return the Covered Device to an Apple Store or authorized service provider assigned by us that offers carry-in service. Service will be performed for you at the store, or the store may send the Covered Device to an Apple repair service (“ARS”) site for service. Once we notify you that service is complete, you promptly will retrieve the Covered Device.
(ii) Mail-in service. Direct mail-in service is available for most Covered Devices. If we determine that your Covered Device is eligible for mail-in service, we will send you a prepaid waybill (and, if needed, packaging material) and you must ship the Covered Device to an ARS site according to our instructions. Once service is complete, the ARS site will return the Covered Device to you. We will pay for shipping to and from your location if you follow all instructions.
(iii) Express Replacement Service (“ERS”). ERS is available for certain Covered Devices. ERS is not available for Screen-only ADH Claims. If ERS is available, the following process will apply:
(a) Service where we require you to return the claimed product or part. We may require a credit card authorization to serve as security for the retail price of the replacement Covered Device or part and applicable shipping costs. If you are not able to provide credit card authorization, service may not be available to you and we will offer an alternative arrangement for service. We will ship a replacement product or part to you with installation instructions, if applicable, and any requirements for the return of the claimed product or part. If you follow the instructions, we will cancel the credit card authorization, so you will not be charged for the replacement product or part and shipping to and from your location. If you fail to return the replaced product or part as instructed or return a replaced product or part that is ineligible for service, we will charge the credit card for the authorized amount.
 

A_Flying_Panda

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2017
187
94
Just remember this, apple ALLOW them to send out replacement phones, and apple don’t send junk. If apple’s allowing it, I’m not concerned about the quality. I mean after all, apple still have to provide warranty service on those replacement phones.

The insurance company may have sent out some ‘cheap junk’ they refurbished themselves, but can you bring those phones to Genius Bar and ask for a free repair? Probably not right? That’s the difference.
 

kerrikins

macrumors 65816
Sep 22, 2012
1,243
530
Yes, so it appears... until next year, when they cheap out more and let Assurant handle everything to cut costs and make even more money. Absolutely shameful.
[doublepost=1536894906][/doublepost]

We have no way of knowing this. It is entirely possible that once you make a loss/theft claim, that AppleCare is done with at that point once you get the replacement. I have seen nothing saying AppleCare will transfer over to the new phone, and I have been digging deep on this issue (which apparently no one else has been).

If they were "Apple proven phones", then why even have Assurant send THEIR phones out? Why not just send phones from Apple which they have been doing up until this point? The ONLY reason to send Assurant phones is to cut costs and use their cheap refurb phones.

Apple isn't an insurance company. I'm really not sure why you're so angry and worked up over the fact that they don't want to get into the insurance business. Regular AppleCare+ is different because it only offers repairs or replacements of devices they see and can validate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1144557

mikethebigo

macrumors 68020
May 25, 2009
2,392
1,497
I was considering changing to the theft plan at preorder time... but this is making me think twice. Maybe good old AppleCare+ is what I want. I don't want to argue with some 3rd party company over stolen or lost devices.
 

tl01

macrumors 68020
Jun 20, 2010
2,350
649
Yea bro... Great plan. So $300 for AppleCare, $250 for the lost phone, and then $100 for fixing the junk Assurant phone that will almost certainly be screwed up in some way. So when all is said and done, you just spent $650.

If it is a defect...you don’t pay.
[doublepost=1536899600][/doublepost]And maybe Apple has set a standard for phones coming in through this program. We really don’t know what is going on behind the scenes.
 

Sackofnickels

Suspended
Jul 13, 2018
285
492
Apple has already cheapened their stance by endorsing deceiving scams. Just look at the Barclaycard. Yeah, you don’t pay any interest for 18 months on an Apple purchase, but don’t buy anything else with it while you’re financing an Apple purchase or you might be forced to pay over 24% APR! Also, if you miss the 18 month deadline to pay off that purchase, you’ll have to pay deferred interest which means you’ll have to pay interest accrued for 18 months as if there was never any free financing to begin with.

Apple isn’t a “safe place” for consumers. You still have to be smart about these schemes.

Deferred interest is nothing new. Companies bet that the cardholder will not pay off their purchase in the time frame they give you. The terms are spelled out before you sign on the doted line. There is no deception. It is up to the account holder to pay off the loan before the allotted time. I would think the issue is more likely poor budgeting by the card holder. Or maybe they financed more than they could afford.
 

Tapiture

macrumors 65816
Oct 1, 2016
1,118
1,683
Deferred interest is nothing new. Companies bet that the cardholder will not pay off their purchase in the time frame they give you. The terms are spelled out before you sign on the doted line. There is no deception. It is up to the account holder to pay off the loan before the allotted time. I would think the issue is more likely poor budgeting by the card holder. Or maybe they financed more than they could afford.
It’s not just the deferred interest, it’s also the fact that if you’re financing an Apple product and you use the card for anything else, then you have to pay 24% APR on any other purchases.
 

Sackofnickels

Suspended
Jul 13, 2018
285
492
It’s not just the deferred interest, it’s also the fact that if you’re financing an Apple product and you use the card for anything else, then you have to pay 24% APR on any other purchases.

And they don't spell that out in the terms and conditions? Any time I have ever obtained a credit card I pay close attention to the interest rate. I can't believe this was a deceiving bombshell dropped on an unsuspecting consumer.
 

Lobwedgephil

macrumors 603
Apr 7, 2012
5,792
4,757
It’s not just the deferred interest, it’s also the fact that if you’re financing an Apple product and you use the card for anything else, then you have to pay 24% APR on any other purchases.

Only if you don't pay the balance, like all cards. Pretty clear the terms, the interest free is only for apple products. I don't see the issue.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.