Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Quoting this to highlight its truth.

There is no way Apple goes from selling you two devices to selling you one device. That’s dumb. Unless that one device costs as much as two devices - which would also be dumb. Honestly, it’s ok to have different devices for different use cases. I don’t need my toaster to also make coffee.

What they will do is not make a macOS tablet or even a macOS 2-in-1, that would still keep consumers believing they need 2 devices. I love my toaster, um I mean my Surface Pro, absolutely the best computing device I've ever purchased.
 
As long as it is an option (read: not mandatory) across the product line, and in no way impacts development of the non-touch screens or changes to the interface, then great! More power to the weirdos that want this.
However, it seems to have proven largely true that when development is spent on one side of the equation, it must balance with the other. Just like all movies aren't produced in 3D, I don't want all laptops to be touchscreen if it negatively impacts the company's ability to provide real value elsewhere. We learned this dichotomy with Windows 8.0, remember?

So, please, don't tell me "if you don't like it, don't buy it and shut up!" It's naive to pretend that there isn't a very real risk this does not negatively impact the rest of the product and software lines. Could it not? Sure. But the risk is there, and it is perfectly logical to not like that.
Correct.

I don’t a touch screen computer because I can’t clean the screen without putting a ton of random inputs in. It’s not as simple as “don’t use it”.
 
I won't buy a touchscreen laptop either. I am satisfied with my iPad, although I don't use it very often.
 
44DB98B4-2F31-413D-819C-84841D59CBF9.jpeg

 
Correct.

I don’t a touch screen computer because I can’t clean the screen without putting a ton of random inputs in. It’s not as simple as “don’t use it”.

*shrug* Cleaning the screen on a touchscreen computer is no different than cleaning a smartphone or tablet. Just do so when the screen is off.

In all seriousness, the negative reaction to the idea of introducing a touchscreen line of Macs is perplexing to me. A 2-in-1 line of MacBooks can sit within the current lineup while still allowing for the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro lines to continue being sold.

If anything Apple is poised to do a 2-in1 better than anyone else has given the fact that they have aligned the iPads and Macs on the hardware side with Apple silicon. Bringing touch to MacOS need not bring along with it a huge change in UI, Windows supports touch but is still not hugely different than it was before that. Simply having the ability to use Apple Pencil on a Surface like MacBook with the ability to launch iOS applications on top of MacOS would be fantastic. Microsoft is failing to do it so far with the poor performance of Android apps on Windows.
 
Bringing touch to MacOS need not bring along with it a huge change in UI, Windows supports touch but is still not hugely different than it was before that.

My Windows work laptop has a touch screen. I’ve never touched it once, except for cleaning. It simply does not add to the utility or user experience with operating systems such as Windows or macOS.
 
Not sure why the hate.
Many have been using their iPads always connected to Smart Folio or Magic keyboard for years now.
Make touch an optional setting and everyone wins.

Besides a move to M-chips, what ‘innovations’ have we seen come to Apple laptops in the past 10 years? The return of ports?
 
It’s too late for this. Even in the Windows world nobody cares about touch screen laptops. None of my users have even mentioned it in years. Around the Windows 8 time a lot of people started to get them. Most people didn’t even know they had them.

Maybe Apple will do their magic and make something happen we didn’t expect, but I don’t know. When they first announced iOS apps on the Mac it sounded great. Then every developer of every app opted out, so they could sell (or continue to sell) a more expensive Mac App Store version. Not that there’s necessarily anything wrong with that, but what was the point of iOS apps then?

Sure, nobody has to use it. But then we’re right back where Windows laptops were, where they are more expensive because of a touch screen everyone immediately forgets they even have.
 
Not sure why the hate.
Many have been using their iPads always connected to Smart Folio or Magic keyboard for years now.
Make touch an optional setting and everyone wins.

Besides a move to M-chips, what ‘innovations’ have we seen come to Apple laptops in the past 10 years? The return of ports?
iPads run iOS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672
My Windows work laptop has a touch screen. I’ve never touched it once, except for cleaning. It simply does not add to the utility or user experience with operating systems such as Windows or macOS.
For YOU. Just because some in the market do not need a particular functionality doesn’t mean others would not benefit from it. Many who own Surface Pro devices for example make use of the touch screen and stylus input for various things (myself included, particularly with OneNote) and yet the majority of Windows users carry on just fine without it using the plethora of Windows machines that have or do not have a touch screen.
 
I don’t see the convincing ”why” in this. A few years ago touchscreen laptops were everywhere and now not so much, almost like a fad.

Or maybe Apple has a different idea than what has been done so far. Maybe the keyboard part of the laptop is all touchscreen as well? So essentially a sort of large foldable tablet?

Just because they’re exploring this doesn’t mean it will result in an actual product.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: gco212
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.