Quoting this to highlight its truth.
There is no way Apple goes from selling you two devices to selling you one device. That’s dumb. Unless that one device costs as much as two devices - which would also be dumb. Honestly, it’s ok to have different devices for different use cases. I don’t need my toaster to also make coffee.
Touch my screen, expect a little hand-slap.
No to greasy fingerprints on the screen.
Correct.As long as it is an option (read: not mandatory) across the product line, and in no way impacts development of the non-touch screens or changes to the interface, then great! More power to the weirdos that want this.
However, it seems to have proven largely true that when development is spent on one side of the equation, it must balance with the other. Just like all movies aren't produced in 3D, I don't want all laptops to be touchscreen if it negatively impacts the company's ability to provide real value elsewhere. We learned this dichotomy with Windows 8.0, remember?
So, please, don't tell me "if you don't like it, don't buy it and shut up!" It's naive to pretend that there isn't a very real risk this does not negatively impact the rest of the product and software lines. Could it not? Sure. But the risk is there, and it is perfectly logical to not like that.
might still keep the combo - but only take one device with me for travelIf the screen is detachable or can be rotated to 360° , and there is pencil support, i would definitely take it over my Mac+ipad Convo
Well not “literally” 😎Steve Jobs would literally be rolling in his grave if this really happened.
Unless the touch screen part is only on the keyboard side, ie replacing the keyboard with basically an iPad.
That would be Nice. But it needs either MacOS with touch or something new. iPad OS suks for productivity. And important Apps are Crippleware.It’s too gimmicky, too distracting and I don’t like it.
How about we focus on the 16” iPad Ultra? Massive Touch-screen Display!
Correct.
I don’t a touch screen computer because I can’t clean the screen without putting a ton of random inputs in. It’s not as simple as “don’t use it”.
Mac Pad Pro
The release of iPadOS and devs being able to create MacOS and iOS versions of apps concurrently makes me think it's inevitable the Apple will launch an ARM based laptop.
its not more precise if you use a pen.Why would I reach over a trackpad to touch a screen when the trackpad is infinitely more precise and comfortable?
Bringing touch to MacOS need not bring along with it a huge change in UI, Windows supports touch but is still not hugely different than it was before that.
The UI, you can manage with keyboard and mouse. The touchscreen would be killer for things like photoshop.Before we got MacBook Pros, my company issued various windows laptops with touchscreens. I don’t know a single person who used the touchscreen. The UI targets aren’t designed for touch input really.
iPads run iOS.Not sure why the hate.
Many have been using their iPads always connected to Smart Folio or Magic keyboard for years now.
Make touch an optional setting and everyone wins.
Besides a move to M-chips, what ‘innovations’ have we seen come to Apple laptops in the past 10 years? The return of ports?
For YOU. Just because some in the market do not need a particular functionality doesn’t mean others would not benefit from it. Many who own Surface Pro devices for example make use of the touch screen and stylus input for various things (myself included, particularly with OneNote) and yet the majority of Windows users carry on just fine without it using the plethora of Windows machines that have or do not have a touch screen.My Windows work laptop has a touch screen. I’ve never touched it once, except for cleaning. It simply does not add to the utility or user experience with operating systems such as Windows or macOS.