Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
which prompts for your Apple password but won’t actually succeed as you don’t get a login prompt on your other devices.

Hmm. What would happen if you signed in somewhere else in the OS as a way of getting a login prompt, then used that within iTunes? This is the method that gets iMessage working on Mavericks.
 

seems to be startergo's fraken-security.framework. Do be aware that around this period there was the infamous "goto fail" bug. One of the docs said "Guardrails — versions NOT to use", but it's not clear what version it ended up using instead. Also at least modern Security.framework is used for more than just TLS
 
Hmm. What would happen if you signed in somewhere else in the OS as a way of getting a login prompt, then used that within iTunes? This is the method that gets iMessage working on Mavericks.
Do you know by chance when iMessage login got messed up in Mavericks? I have been logged in for about 5 years and don't recall having any problems at that time. I know that in Sierra iMessage refuses to use the account logged in anywhere else for me, not sure why, but logging in directly in the app works still. Curious where in the system I might try to see if it'd work.
 
Do you know by chance when iMessage login got messed up in Mavericks? I have been logged in for about 5 years and don't recall having any problems at that time. I know that in Sierra iMessage refuses to use the account logged in anywhere else for me, not sure why, but logging in directly in the app works still. Curious where in the system I might try to see if it'd work.
The issues started some time in the summer of 2024.


Since iirc Sierra postdates the introduction of two-step authentication I don't think any of this will work (you won't get a code you can append to the end of your password).

(If you have more questions it might be good to move to a separate thread so we can keep this one focused on AquaProxy.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: retta283
I am working on a successor to Aqua Proxy which will fix HTTPS connections without a proxy server. (It will a port of this project for iOS to the Mac). I will eventually make a new thread for this when it's ready.

But in the meantime, an important question—are there any Snow Leopard users who use PPC apps (via Rosetta) which need Aqua Proxy to work? If so, which one(s)? If no one needs it, I will skip Rosetta support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DurltazorOSXPower

seems to be startergo's fraken-security.framework. Do be aware that around this period there was the infamous "goto fail" bug. One of the docs said "Guardrails — versions NOT to use", but it's not clear what version it ended up using instead. Also at least modern Security.framework is used for more than just TLS
I have not yet uploaded the latest patches yet. Plus there is too much junk yet needs cleaning. But the binary has been tested currently on a Mac mini 3.1 and UTM SL.
 
I am working on a successor to Aqua Proxy which will fix HTTPS connections without a proxy server. (It will a port of this project for iOS to the Mac). I will eventually make a new thread for this when it's ready.

But in the meantime, an important question—are there any Snow Leopard users who use PPC apps (via Rosetta) which need Aqua Proxy to work? If so, which one(s)? If no one needs it, I will skip Rosetta
For my part, I only use the rosetta for games, but.. what about powerpc users? I think it's cool if there is a possible future update of the next aqua proxy for these machines.
 
I think renaming this thread to reflect all macOS versions up to Mojave is becoming more urgent: Dictionary's Wikipedia in Mojave is effectively incapacitated. The constant changes they play with on the Wiki dev team broke it. Do Aqua Proxy and the Wikifix work with 10.14?
Screenshot 2026-08-14 at 17.40.18.png
 
I'm sorry, I have no interest in spending time on any version of macOS later than 10.9. If someone else would like to take the code and build on it, that would be really cool, but it won't come from me.
 
Well, the installer won't run above 10.10, but you could bypass that.

AquaProxy uses a heuristic to determine which traffic should be MiTM'd vs passed through which will be wrong on 10.11+, where modern protocols are natively supported. So you'd have to use -force-mitm, which would interfere with certificate pinning, which is also significantly more common on newer versions of macOS.

Other than that, I don't know what would happen. The code is just Go and should be basically OS agnostic. It's possible the legacy OS patches would interfere with the binary running but you don't need those anyway, so just recompile with whatever version of Go you like.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.