don't really care about cosmetic changes. but i do want 64GB, so i may be disappointed.i wouldn't place my odds any higher than 50/50.
Btw: I'm calling it now: after os 4 brings multitasking and other goodies, the screen/resolution will be the new point of attack for haters and trolls, just like multitasking took over when os 3 brought mms, cc&p, stereo BT, etc. It will suddenly become the most important issue in the world and will prove why the iPhone is "stale," "lagging behind," and generally not as good as the android flavor of the month.
Software is the most important. Than the internal components. Appearance is third. It's not that I don't care - really ugly phones like the droid are immediately less appealing. But if apple nails os 4, I'll be happy. If they also upgrade the hardware, they can keep the same design and I'd be fine with it.
If it does change, I'd lime to see a bit thinner and maybe less black space above and below the screen. Perfectly happy with it otherwise.
Btw: I'm calling it now: after os 4 brings multitasking and other goodies, the screen/resolution will be the new point of attack for haters and trolls, just like multitasking took over when os 3 brought mms, cc&p, stereo BT, etc. It will suddenly become the most important issue in the world and will prove why the iPhone is "stale," "lagging behind," and generally not as good as the android flavor of the month.
If it weren't for these "haters and trolls" complaining to Apple they'd assume you were more than happy with web based applications, EDGE only (no 3G), no MMS, no copy and paste, and no stereo BT. I guess you were more than happy with the iPhone 1.0?
Don't forget videorecording on the 3Gs - only the most basic feature that even dumbphones with cameras always had.
None of those "dumb phones" generate footage that is useful for anything. The 3GS appears to be the first phone to generate usable footage. And it's certainly the first phone to contain enough internal storage to be able to store said footage. I would hardy call this a "basic feature".
No. The point of the iPhone is 2 things:
Touchscreen
Software
The point of the hardware is to go as unnoticed as possible. I already just think of the hardware as 'black edges around my screen.' I'm not sure how to make it much more minimal than that. Can you? I could stand the phone to be slightly thinner (but not as thin as the iPod Touch) but that depends on the technology available. I don't think they can do much about that right now. So I really have no suggestions for what they should change.
Unless, of course, you're talking about going the other way and making the hardware MORE visable and MORE obvious.
In which case I'd say, no, that's a very bad idea.
I think the screen should be an optional glossy or matt finish like the MBPros and that they should bring back the aluminum casing. They black iphones crack at the dock connector and the white shows all the stress fractures. Its annoying and a terrible design.
The move from aluminum to plastic solved two problems:
1. Cost - Apple saved lots of money by making the transition from metal to plastic, since apparently the metal casing was big part of the premium pricing of the original iPhones. In turn, we saw reduced prices as the plastic models rolled out.
2. Antenna reception - phone signals penetrate better behind plastic in comparison to metal.
However, aluminum backed premium phones these days seem to be getting around connection issues, probably due to clever antenna placement. I hope they either find a more durable plastic solution (soft touch plastic would be nice), or go back to aluminum with some clever engineering.
The move from aluminum to plastic solved two problems:
2. Antenna reception - phone signals penetrate better behind plastic in comparison to metal.
However, aluminum backed premium phones these days seem to be getting around connection issues, probably due to clever antenna placement. I hope they either find a more durable plastic solution (soft touch plastic would be nice), or go back to aluminum with some clever engineering.
Titanium works just fine for this guy, seems not to have any antenna problems either.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/iphone-3gs-mod-ditches-plastic-cover-in-favor-of-titanium-vestme/
Titanium works just fine for this guy, seems not to have any antenna problems either.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/24/iphone-3gs-mod-ditches-plastic-cover-in-favor-of-titanium-vestme/
Yeah, I'll probably be disappointed. The iPhone is a piece of mainstream crap now.
However Apple is Apple and they don't really give two ***** about whatever anybody else is doing
Plus one.Better camera I think is a given. Flash I hope we get, but it I think apple will only put it in if they think they can integrate it well with the design of the back.
Again faster processor and more memory is a given.
Capacity I am unsure of, I think if the Touch gets any bigger it will be pushing into the iPod Classic's market, so I think for this year at least the capacity will still be 32gb.
Software, I am still unsure about multitasking. Other than music apps, I don't personally see much benefit in it. If we do get this though I don't think we will see that feature on the 3G and maybe not on the 3GS, due to the lack of power and battery.
I would probably still buy it, but a fresh, new design is one of the things I'm looking forward to the most on the new iPhone.
I really do want to see a metal back, an oled screen of higher resolution. I think hardware improvements are important even though the software is the main focus.
Alu back. Since the reception issues only plagued the older iPhone, seeing that the iPad sports Alu now and reception issues resolved, this will be a possibility for the iPhone 4.