The base model might actually be the one to get, since you can plop in the 12 core cpu yourself and save a little money.
Presuming you don't brick the whole thing
Presuming you don't brick the whole thing
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Base Model Geekbench
- Thread starter d-m-a-x
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Oh really? The going price for a 4,1/5,1 right now is about $2500, plus your CPU upgrade, so that would mean the base model cost $5k?
My exaggeration on top of yours aside...
IF someone can find a great deal on a 5,1, that should be a consideration, but those deals seem to have dried up.. (I missed the big sale at Frys....)
The base model might actually be the one to get, since you can plop in the 12 core cpu yourself and save a little money.
Presuming you don't brick the whole thing
that was my thinking.
if you look at the list of avail intel cpu.. the 12 core is the slowest in clock speed. Unless your application will be using full 12 core, I don't really thinking going 12 core will be any faster.
instead I'm more interested in this;
Xeon E5-2667 v2 8 / 16 3.3 GHz 4 GHz 25 MB 2 130W HT, TBT
yeah it will be a long time before the 12 becomes affordable
----------
Does your machine have thunderbolt? yeah thats what i thought
----------
the MBP gets hot enough for the Gpu to malfunction. I'll try and run a benchmark later
Oh really? The going price for a 4,1/5,1 right now is about $2500, plus your CPU upgrade, so that would mean the base model cost $5k?
My exaggeration on top of yours aside...
IF someone can find a great deal on a 5,1, that should be a consideration, but those deals seem to have dried up.. (I missed the big sale at Frys....)
MP 2009, 800USD: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Apple-MacPro-Early-2009-XEON-Quad-Core-2-66Ghz-3GB-640GB-HDD-MOUSE-KEYBOARD-/151200817317?pt=Apple_Desktops&hash=item23344560a5
W3680, 699USD: http://www.ebay.com/itm/INTEL-XEON-W3680-3-33GHz-HEX-CORE-12MB-6-4-GT-s-LGA1366-SLBV2-PROCESSOR-/171193047558?pt=US_Server_CPUs_Processors&hash=item27dbe69a06
So, 800+699USD = 1499USD, which is quite close to half the asking price of 2999USD for the base model OP bought.
And performance? 13985 in 32-bit multicore Geekbench.
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/search?q=model:%22Mac%20Pro%20(Mid%202010)%22%20platform:%22Mac%22%20processor:%22Intel%20Xeon%20W3680%22%20frequency:3330%20bits:32
So:
- 1499USD for 13985 in Geekbench, or
- 2999USD for 12849 in Geekbench
Exactly as I wrote previously:
"Only about 1000 points less than my 4,1->5,1 with W3680 - and your machine was only twice as expensive as mine..."
----------
Do you have to pay for overly expensive external enclosures for simple expansions? Yeah, that's what I thought.
That is a great price on that rig, as that page shows, the average price is usually closer to 1200.. however, the video card in that system is crap, and it's low on ram, so you would have to add at least $500 more to get the performance of the base nMP, unless of course, all you run is Geekbench.
But, that is a good price on a 4,1. If that was local on Craiglist, I might buy it..
His machine has SATA ... Does yours? Yeah, that's what I thought. :facepalm:
/edit I'm really happy for you that you like your new machine (eventhough it'll be outperformed by the next MBP) but you really sound stupid hating on people who critizise the new machine.
Also you most likely won't upgrade anything except CPU (be careful though) and RAM. HDD and graphics are proprietary and there won't be Macvidcards to the rescue this time around. So really, your machine will be outperformed by a notebook soon and there's little you can do.
Last edited:
It's an old machine plain and simple. Not only no thunderbolt, the usb3 does not function well (no tethered shooting). The nMp fills my needs because it is a new machine with updated hardware and software. I have a 1,1 (with sata) that will make a good file server
Ohh! Ohh! I want the old standard and not the new one for $500 Alex!
Oh, must have missed that TB is the new standard. Well for the moment it looks like it'll go the way of firewire. Well supported by Apple but not even close to a standard. Also gone in 6 years or so.
Last edited:
I didn't realize so many of you were buying machines for Geekbench scores…silly me!
Is there a rule here or something that people have to be rude to anybody happy with their purchase? Let the guy enjoy his machine…he's happy with it apparently.
People make too much of Geekbench scores. CPU isn't everything anymore. If your Mac Pro 5,1 has a similar Geekbench score or better…lets not forget it likely doesn't get 800mb/s+ internal storage, or Thunderbolt2 ports in massive quantity, or the workstation GPU's. Who in the world cares if a laptop gets a similar score? Does that make them equals? Hardly. Lets exercise some restraint and common sense. There's no need for a "mine's bigger then yours" thread.
The new base model Mac Pro is a fine machine...
Is there a rule here or something that people have to be rude to anybody happy with their purchase? Let the guy enjoy his machine…he's happy with it apparently.
People make too much of Geekbench scores. CPU isn't everything anymore. If your Mac Pro 5,1 has a similar Geekbench score or better…lets not forget it likely doesn't get 800mb/s+ internal storage, or Thunderbolt2 ports in massive quantity, or the workstation GPU's. Who in the world cares if a laptop gets a similar score? Does that make them equals? Hardly. Lets exercise some restraint and common sense. There's no need for a "mine's bigger then yours" thread.
The new base model Mac Pro is a fine machine...
I'm not sure why folks bring up the iMac as a point of argument against the base Mac Pro? It looks to have similar CPU performance, has more outputs, and can be upgraded with GPU performance the iMac could never have. Even at the base of Dual D300's you have identical VRAM to the maxed out iMac but with 2 matching workstation GPU's instead of a mobile one.
If someone loves the new iMac's performance but doesn't want to get stuck with the all-in-one form factor or wants to use a monitor of their choosing the nMP base model is right up your alley without spending much more money either. You basically get a headless iMac with greater GPU possibilities for a similar price. I don't get the fuss?
If someone loves the new iMac's performance but doesn't want to get stuck with the all-in-one form factor or wants to use a monitor of their choosing the nMP base model is right up your alley without spending much more money either. You basically get a headless iMac with greater GPU possibilities for a similar price. I don't get the fuss?
I'm really learning geekbench is irrelevant. On paper my 1,1 would be on par with the nMp, but it WHOMPS it in practice
I think you're reading the scores wrong. There's no way a nMP and the 1,1 are anywhere near each other in Geekbench scores.
My 3,1 gets 1558 single CPU and 10,781 for 8 cpu's in geek bench 3 32bit. This base nMac pro gets 3188/12849. How would your 1,1 compare exactly?
Last edited:
the day will come where you see your iphone geekbench around the same as all the mac...
but it mean nothing... it just a score... move on...
geekbench only talk about CPU only.. and people forgot computer is make up of other parts other then CPU..
the nMP SSD speed alone already throw every SSD in the market out of the windows...
dude, i can read AND count. My 1,1 was somewhere around 11,000 after the upgrades
Last edited:
LOL well yea if you upgraded it obviously. But when you say 1,1 and that's it of course I'm going to assume it's one of the standard setups. You lose the value of saying it's a 1,1 if it's not really the original 1,1. What did you upgrade it to?
5365 i think, ram, ssd, 4890 radeon.
There was something not right in there, ssd kept failing because of the trim - and a video card issue where it would not start up. It is a file server now, served me well since 2006, but thank god for the new machine
I'm not sure if you posted what GPU's you got, I assume the D300's as you got your new mac early, but could you run one or both of the Heaven and Valley benchmarks? Many of us are wondering how the D300's perform. Please use the extreme preset like Barefeats does. Thanks!
http://unigine.com/products/heaven/download/
http://unigine.com/products/valley/download/
http://unigine.com/products/heaven/download/
http://unigine.com/products/valley/download/