So you consider that Adsorb would be a better solution than using navigators extensions/plugins?See my previous comments on dns vs certificates. Gist: dns blocks inherently safer.
So you consider that Adsorb would be a better solution than using navigators extensions/plugins?See my previous comments on dns vs certificates. Gist: dns blocks inherently safer.
Define better?So you consider that Adsorb would be a better solution than using navigators extensions/plugins?
Generally speaking DNS blocks are safest.I'm asking you the question! So please elaborate.
It bears repeating : dns only exposes the site dns name information, not actual content. That is a big difference and a big reason to stick with just-DNS blocks.But on-prem pihole is still by far the most private. Add OpenDNS to the mix and I can manage even more what gets out (but they’d see anything my pihole referred to up the DNS ladder).
👍It bears repeating : dns only exposes the site dns name information, not actual content. That is a big difference and a big reason to stick with just-DNS blocks.
Can you check and give the results if you desactive PiHole?PiHole+Safari+Wipr: 100/92.
Hmm, I'm wondering why I get a lower score. Do you have an idea about the proper settings I should check?100/84.
All three are ON. There must be something else.Wipr1-3 are enabled; what's your setup?
Hmmm, that may make a notable difference, I guess.I also have a router (Unifi Dream Machine Pro) that blocks all traffic to/from about 12 unrequired nations.
The combination of Safari + a "Safari Content Blocker" such as Wipr or 1Blocker is a great first step. They are "Content Blockers" and not extensions. This is a good thing!
Why Safari "Content Blockers"? Because they are basically rule sets. Wipr and 1Blocker don't read the data and change it. Instead, they create rules for Safari to interpret (e.g. ignore this web content (such as ads), remove these HTML tags). From a privacy standpoint, this is what you want. Those apps aren't reading your websites. They are only providing updated rules to Safari on what content should be filtered out.
1Blocker does have an additional "extension" component for blocking YouTube ads, but you do NOT have to enable it. OR, you can just enable it to work on YouTube's website and have Deny access to any other website.
I've tried both products, 1Blocker has turned out to be a great solution. Lifetime license that I can share with my entire family. Mac, iPad, iPhones all use it.
Yes, the 1Blocker Actions toolbar utility can see what website you are visting (but NOT the website contents). It's an add-on that lets you whitelist websites from any blocking.what do you think about this?
also they do not have an icon , just something that says JS. Whats up with that?
Yes, the 1Blocker Actions toolbar utility can see what website you are visting (but NOT the website contents). It's an add-on that lets you whitelist websites from any blocking.
Regarding "1Blocker Scripts", the Safari toolbar icon looks like a square with JS inside of it. This is the Extension where I limit its functionality. I only allow it to work on YouTube.com. For all other sites, the default action is to DENY. You can configure this in Safari Preferences.
I notice AdGuard Home exists, so that’s something else to try that would keep the traffic blocked local.I can't believe there's still no go-to solution if you want:
- no ads
- no trackers
- privacy
- safety
- open source
There just isn't. You either have to be an expert or exchange all your data with a shady ad-blocking company.
I can see a big market here. There's many people that want all the points listed. I want to install something and never think about it again. And do it's job. And there's millions of others who want that as well.
Come on guys, bring up something!
I notice AdGuard Home exists, so that’s something else to try that would keep the traffic blocked local.