The 3440x1440 ultrawide? If you want a higher pixel density then 100%. I’m going to two 4K monitors versus having an ultrawide. After using a 4K monitor, I can’t use a lower resolution.That monitor better than the curved Samsung?.
The 3440x1440 ultrawide? If you want a higher pixel density then 100%. I’m going to two 4K monitors versus having an ultrawide. After using a 4K monitor, I can’t use a lower resolution.That monitor better than the curved Samsung?.
Ok the Samsung would be a good upgrade I don’t game it’s just for internet and watching films if my Mac can drive it.The 3440x1440 ultrawide? If you want a higher pixel density then 100%. I’m going to two 4K monitors versus having an ultrawide. After using a 4K monitor, I can’t use a lower resolution.
Plan to buy the same monitor.
Any experiences so far?
I had to drive to Middlesbrough to get the monitor as it seemed to be the only place remotely near that stocked it.Don’t make me jealous! I’d love an ultrawide, but it would be a bit much next to a 27” 4K monitor!
[doublepost=1546170594][/doublepost]
Ooft, sorry i just assume most folks have the 2018 model. I doubt the 2012 mini can run it at full res @60hz.
Apparently it works at 50hz: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/mac-mini-late-2012-with-lg-34uc98-at-3440x1440.2038327/
Probably 2-3 feet. I'm getting a new desk that will push it another 4-5 inches away. When you can find a solid wallpaper, the quality is definitely there. Everything is nice and crisp to read as well.How close do you sit? Does it still seem super high quality at that distance?
What resolution would my 2012 Mac mini run it atI had to drive to Middlesbrough to get the monitor as it seemed to be the only place remotely near that stocked it.
Really impressed so far. The curve is amazing, I can tilt and move the monitor as I need and MacOS looks great.
Windows UI looks less impressive and full res is probably too much for my PC. I've started to run it in 2560x1080 and games like Overwatch and PUBG look good. Diablo 3 is a bit more stuttery although im sure i can lower some settings to sort that out.
Lightroom looks great and general productivity is going to be amazing on this thing.
Overall it is a great all rounder for the price if you aren't too fussed about having everything look and run perfectly.
I had to drive to Middlesbrough to get the monitor as it seemed to be the only place remotely near that stocked it.
Really impressed so far. The curve is amazing, I can tilt and move the monitor as I need and MacOS looks great.
Windows UI looks less impressive and full res is probably too much for my PC. I've started to run it in 2560x1080 and games like Overwatch and PUBG look good. Diablo 3 is a bit more stuttery although im sure i can lower some settings to sort that out.
Lightroom looks great and general productivity is going to be amazing on this thing.
Overall it is a great all rounder for the price if you aren't too fussed about having everything look and run perfectly.
This. The viewing distance from the screen is too often absent from the discussion about which screen to get.How close do you sit? Does it still seem super high quality at that distance?
Dell U2718Q 4K HDR UltrasharpI only need one monitor.
any suggestions ?
The 24 inch 2415q is better as for what everyone says.Dell U2718Q 4K HDR Ultrasharp
Dell U2718Q 4K HDR Ultrasharp
I did compare it with LG 27UK850W before paymentDisagree strongly. There are many better monitors out there for that much money. A simple google search and several reviews will tell you so as well.
some old monitors is now out of stock. dell u2718q is still availableThe 24 inch 2415q is better as for what everyone says.
The 27 inch has lower local count and not as good 4k
Ingerman wrote:
"If I ditch my 2015 27" iMac I want a bigger screen. This seems to fit the bill."
Be careful about that display.
Not the quality -- the resolution.
32" at 4k is going to give you a display that "looks like" 1080p (but in HiDPI mode).
That means that effectively, the "perceived pixels" will be larger -- as in "blown up".
You may not be satisfied with that.
On the other hand, 32" at 1440p will look properly-sized (at least to me) -- BUT -- it's going to be "an interpolated image" (the default resolution of the display is 3840x2160).
What this means in practical terms is that the Mini's integrated GPU is going to "work harder" to scale that image, and others here have complained about the speed and smoothness of the display when viewing scaled images.
Speaking only for myself, I would like a 32" display, also.
But it will have to be either 5k (to keep the perceived pixel size reasonable), or "straight 1440p" (which is native 2560×1440).
Since I don't know of anyone currently selling a 32" 5k display, the only realistic choice for this size (32") becomes a native 1440p display...
There are 100 different monitors that you can attach to a MacMini. An Apple sticker won't improve it. I can get 1920x1080 for £75, big monitors 34 inch, 3440x1440 for under £600, 4K from around £300, 5K for, well, lots. There is no "best". You decide what you want, and you pay for it.I'm still a little surprised that Apple didn't announce a monitor line along with the Mini. Maybe whenever they get around to the new Pro and/or the rumored modular Mac?
so the LG / Apple specific monitors looks tempting but what else should i consider (lets say under $800) just want to consider my options. i'm a monitor newbie.
may be i missed this info, but which size of the LG do you use?I setup my MacMini (i5/16/256) yesterday with the LG4K Ultrafine and am blown away with the screen & build quality.
It's simply amazing, as it should be, for the price.
Everything from waking from sleep, shutting down, & startups work perfectly with no lag. My main concerns with going with a non Apple optimized monitor.
Its dark out as I type this response and nearly fried my eyes with the 500 nit brightness. I've now setup nightshift in Mojave for a better evening experience.
Again, just an incredible monitor imo
The 4K Ultrafine is 21.5”may be i missed this info, but which size of the LG do you use?