I think this was true in the eighties, when there were loads of different OS's and that wasn't great for he customer, but having 2 or 3 major OS's (as in Games consoles) would be for the best. Apple and Microsoft both certainly get things wrong.
The only issue I have with that is the price gouging. If MS had acted as the benevolent provider of products, fairly priced, then the perception you speak of would be consistent with their actions. However, once they gained a stranglehold on the industry, they quickly began to victimize the consumer. For business it is even worse.
Who says it wasn't great for the consumer?
Computers have been big since the mid-80s from my memory, only then it was Atari STs and Amigas that everyone had at home, with Macs and PCs mostly confined to the office. The major thing that has changed since is communication technology now allows us all to talk to each other about our computers, rather than all of us just using them on our own.Seeing as computers have taken off since I was thinking that they make be connected, though TBH that may be a coincidence, and also most people just use Internet and Office which are available on every platform.
Nah, we used to use BBSes over 300 bps modems back then too.The major thing that has changed since is communication technology now allows us all to talk to each other about our computers, rather than all of us just using them on our own.
Who says it wasn't great for the consumer?
Since there's really no such thing as benevolent capitalism, we as consumers have to rely on a competitive marketplace to escape being gouged. Or, if the marketplace fails, on the enforcement of antitrust laws. Microsoft's big realization was that they could go way over the line of legal competitive behavior, and by the time anyone caught up to them, the victim would already be dead. They repeated this scheme numerous times. None of it was actually good for us, but as far as Microsoft was concerned it was, because they won, and them winning is the same as us winning. Really, this is the way they think!
It's not necessarily lies, as I see it, it's just a childish attitude to take.
Yes, OS X is riddled with holes and bugs. As is Solaris, Linux flavors, Windows flavors, and anything else out there. ****, even cell phones and PDAs are ripe for exploit.
Gates is the Big Dog on the block. As BV noted, apparently he sees Apple as a real threat if he's going to lower himself to name calling and mom jokes.
IMO, he should have taken the high road. Instead, I think he just laid himself open to ridicule down the road. If he thinks that major security holes aren't going to be found and exploited in Vista... then he's sleeping on a giant pile of money.
Further thought... LMH (the OS X bugs dude) is under the employ of Microsoft (or a dummy corp). You heard it here first.
Exactly. As will every other corporate buyer for the next year.
I think it would make a real statement if you took all those Vista discs and sent them back to Microsoft.
While a good image, you know that the type of corporate buyers we're talking about don't have one CD per license, right?
While a good image, you know that the type of corporate buyers we're talking about don't have one CD per license, right?
FWIW my wife works for a big company and just got a new HP notebook at work and although it was "designed for XP" and is "Vista ready" it came from corporate IT preinstalled with 2K, and she's had to fight to allow them to install very expensive lab equipment that requires XP on the controller PC.
Don't think she'll be seeing Vista there any day soon, 2K was only deployed in late 2005.
B
Absolutely. He was known, especially in the early days of Microsoft, for throwing grand mal temper-tantrums.
Interviewer missed a great opporunity there. The answer to that last question should have been "Yes."
I hope everyone here knows Apple didn't invent the GUI...
Many thanks Xerox.
I think that in his nervousness, he accidentally mixed up the words "Mac" and "Windows" . Otherwise, could he really have his head any farther up his ass?
Oh, and a newbie question, but does Parallels require a Windows installation, or does it use a variant of Wine?
Very well said!You have to understand, to Bill Gates any Microsoft competitor, no matter how small or remote, is a direct threat. Competitors, real or even potential, must be eliminated by any means necessary, and at any cost. This is one constant throughout the history of Microsoft. It's the way Bill thinks, base line.
Bill Gates view of history is creative needless to say.
He really sounds concerned about what Apple is doing right now.
I am looking forward to seeing the first Vista virus!