It's like a 2D Prince of Persia
Where are people getting these comparisons? Meh I feel old...
If the game is as good as Mario, Donkey Kong or Price of Persia (all of which are 2D) then daaamn... it must be good!!! Those are all classic top-selling games!
What I think most of you mean is "it's a platform game" with the implication that platform games are not fun (probably pointing out that you're a kid whose 1st game was something along the lines of Half-Life 2.) For those of us who played games in the 80's/early 90's... YES there's lots of platform games. They're not all Mario, Donkey Kong and Prince of Persia (some are really bad); they're just all in the platform game genre.
It's a bit like me looking at a shoddy 1st person shooter and saying "it's a 3d first person shooter"... each to their own, but I don't think that Deus Ex, Half-Life, UT and Quake are all the same just because they all involve a guy holding a gun and shooting people. Platformers are the same... they're mostly different.
This one does not:
1) look like prince of persia (you're not some persian dude who is racing against the clock to save a princess, with a sword as your only weapon)
2) look like Donkey Kong (you're not a big gorilla going around collecting bananas and smashing barrels)
3) look like Mario (you're not a fat Italian/American plumber who travels through pipes, collects mushrooms and jumps of people in order to save a princess)
I could be wrong, but besides being a platform game, I don't think it shares many features of either 3. Its graphics are also HUGELY different from those games (and I'm not bagging Mario/Donkey Kong... while they were 8/16-bit graphics, they had a LOT of detail.)