congrats! I should get mine from BH (4TB version) within the next few hours, very excited!View attachment 2134344
I'm the original poster
So, I did it!
I got VERY lucky. Adorama in NYC offered this configuration for $2,399 with an APINSIDER coupon. However, it was out of stock and I really did not want to order from them.
I called B&H PHOTO (also in NYC). I got a really, really cool guy on the phone that went to all lengths to try and price match. They usually would price match Adorama, but the problem was, the Adorama unit was on backorder. They usually don't get approved to price match if it's not in stock.
The salesman put the order through anyway and...VOILA!...the system allowed him to do it.
So, I essentially got this M1 Studio at Apple Education pricing. It was an incentive enough to order it.
...and I'll have it in my hands tomorrow morning with next-day FedEx delivery.
Thank you to everyone here who responded. I got some great information and all of you were really cool to me in trying to help me determine whether this was the right time or not to order this. Thank you, again!
This is a good point. Probably worth asking one's self why are they buying the Studio. It isn't necessarily about the chip. I bought mine because of the I/O and display support. Those things are what they are and work for me. That's not going to change. I can say with 100% certainty that I use a fraction of the chip's power and that too isn't going to change for quite a while."Impossible question to answer. All I am asking is what would YOU do?"
I already did it two months ago in buying a Studio. But I agonized over the decision for months, because of the potential noise issue and because it seemed like more than I needed. It is more CPU than I need but it turns out that I did need the GPU and I definitely needed the display support. All of the ports area just a bonus.
Nice!!!View attachment 2134344
I'm the original poster
So, I did it!
I got VERY lucky. Adorama in NYC offered this configuration for $2,399 with an APINSIDER coupon. However, it was out of stock and I really did not want to order from them.
I called B&H PHOTO (also in NYC). I got a really, really cool guy on the phone that went to all lengths to try and price match. They usually would price match Adorama, but the problem was, the Adorama unit was on backorder. They usually don't get approved to price match if it's not in stock.
The salesman put the order through anyway and...VOILA!...the system allowed him to do it.
So, I essentially got this M1 Studio at Apple Education pricing. It was an incentive enough to order it.
...and I'll have it in my hands tomorrow morning with next-day FedEx delivery.
Thank you to everyone here who responded. I got some great information and all of you were really cool to me in trying to help me determine whether this was the right time or not to order this. Thank you, again!
Just wanted to say this may have been the most informative and helpful comment I've seen! Thanks!Summary
-----------
If you really need a Mac Studio, I would get it now, especially if your workload is not GPU bound.
If you can wait until June, then wait.
Pricing
-------
I suspect the price of the M2 Mac Studio will be the same as the M1 Mac Studio because there isn't going to be a design refresh.
The Macbook Pro 13" was updated to the M2 processor this past June and it kept the same price as its predecessor.
However, the Macbook Air did increase in price because there was a design refresh.
Release Date
---------------
You mention speculation that the M2 Mac Studio may come out in February or March.
I believe it is more likely that the new Mac Studio comes out during WWDC in June, which is 6 months away.
Apple has said that their target for upgrades is around 18 months, but if the the new Mac Studio comes out in February/March, it will only be 11/12 months since the previous model came out, which is too short of a lifespan.
Also, if Apple releases all the M2 Pro/Max/Ultra models in February/March, what will they talk about during WWDC?
Performance
--------------
The performance of the M2 Mac Studio will be dependent on the fabrication node Apple has decided to go with on the M2 Pro/Max/Ultra processors.
If we take the Apple A processors as a reference for performance uplift between node generations, then we can apply that knowledge to make an educated guess at the expected performance uplift of Apple M processors between versions.
Processor Node Single Core (Geekbench) Multi Core (Geekbench) Metal (Geekbench) Single Core (%Change) Multi Core (%Change) Metal (%Change) A14 TSMC N5 1576 3877 9175 A15 TSMC N5P 1705 4662 14255 8% 20% 55% A16 TSMC N4 1874 5382 15388 10% 15% 8% N5 to N4 (%Change) 19% 39% 68%
Processor Node Single Core (Geekbench) Multi Core (Geekbench) Metal (Geekbench) Single Core (%Change) Multi Core (%Change) Metal (%Change) M1 TSMC N5 1706 7420 20440 M2 TSMC N5P 8928 8928 30627 12% 20% 50%
The current M1 Max/Ultra processors used in the M1 Mac Studio are based on TSMC N5.
If the M2 Mac Studio is based on TSMC N5P like the Macbook Air and 13" Macbook Pro, then expect around 10% single core, 20% multi-core and 50% metal uplift from the current generation.
If the M2 Mac Studio is based on TSMC N4, then expect around 20% single core, 40% multi-core and 70% metal uplift from the current generation.
And if the M2 Mac Studio is based on TSMC N3, then expect around 30% single core, 60% multi-core and 133% metal uplift from the current generation.
I'm thinking the M2 Mac Studio will more likely be TSMC N4, but it is possible to be TSMC N3.
For me, jumping to N3 is too much of a performance leap, but if Apple does go with it -- wow!
It would mean that the M2 Max GPU would be about around the speed of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and the M2 Ultra GPU would be 32% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X in the 2019 Mac Pro.
Otherwise, if Apple uses TSMC N4, then the M2 Max GPU would be about the same speed as the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and the M2 Ultra GPU would be around the same speed as the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X in the 2019 Mac Pro.
No one has any idea whatsoever. The latest rumors indicate that the M2 Pro/Max/Ultra is a 3nm chip. It could potentially have a massive performance improvement over the M1 Pro/Max/Ultra.So basically, the M2 is not going to offer any significant performance enhancement over the M1 that a possible 3-month wait is worth it?
As far as the Midnight color is concerned, it is merely a rumor but one I would highly believe.
Apple always gives a compelling reason to upgrade to a second-gen product by offering a unique color.
It is expected, for example, to be the case with the next ULTRA watch which many are expecting will be offered in a dark color.
Same thing with the STUDIO. Initially, the Pro Minis were offered in Space Grey.
It makes sense, in an effort to differentiate itself from the current M1 model, a Midnight color could be designated to the M2.
Never heard of that dude before and I'm guessing most reputable outlets that cover the Mac rumor mill haven't either.
Why?
No they don't. MacBook Pros have had silver and space gray options since 2006 and they still do today. Before 2006, it was just silver. You've only really had color options and changes on the 12-inch MacBook (which is long discontinued at this point), the MacBook Air as of 2018, and the iMac as of the 2021 M1 models. You had Space Gray come to the Mac mini for the final Intel model (before disappearing again with the advent of the M1 models) and be a visual differentiator on the iMac Pro - clearly exceptions. But otherwise, the statistic you say here is false.
Again, that hasn't been reported anywhere reputable. If it's not talked about in 9to5mac, MacRumors, or AppleInsider, odds of it happening are minimal.
What is a Pro Mini? Apple has products with the "Pro" moniker and products with the "mini" moniker. Never any with both.
That happened only on the MacBook Air and primarily because THE ENTIRE CHASSIS GOT A REDESIGN!
It did not happen on either the 13-inch MacBook Pro nor the iPad Pros both of which got the M2.
The Mac Studio is not getting a redesign or even a color bump on its second rev. Not happening.
Never heard of that dude before and I'm guessing most reputable outlets that cover the Mac rumor mill haven't either.
Take yourself down a few pegs. Unless you are getting information directly from Apple, you shouldn't be so arrogant and sure of yourself.
All I'm telling you is that your sources are likely not trustworthy and that your assessment of trends is false. I'm not telling you that you are a bad person nor am I telling you that you're an idiot (I truly don't have enough information to make such claims one way or the other). Maybe take YOURSELF down a few pegs.At least I used the word "rumor" and didn't present myself as if I had definitive information on any upcoming release.
I follow Mac news coverage pretty religiously. Have been doing so for the last 20 years. I know when I'm reading a rumor that has the likelihood of coming to pass. When I tell you that your source is full of it, I'm telling you that because I have carefully studied which rumors end up being true and which ones don't. And the ones from some dude that are literally not reported on the main outlets are the ones that statistically don't end up being true. You're commenting on them like they're a safe enough bet that it's influencing your shopping. I'm telling you, based on data that I have, that your sources are not likely to be accurate.
I do not need to be directly from Apple to say this since I'm literally talking about how to discern credible rumors from incredible rumors.
All I'm telling you is that your sources are likely not trustworthy and that your assessment of trends is false. I'm not telling you that you are a bad person nor am I telling you that you're an idiot (I truly don't have enough information to make such claims one way or the other). Maybe take YOURSELF down a few pegs.
I'm truly sorry that you do not like being told that your analysis is based on things that didn't actually happen and that your sources are likely bunk. If that's what you consider to be arrogant and condescending, then maybe Internet forums are not the place for you?I follow Apple news just as much as you. You have no exclusive data is that is not available to everyone else that has access to the Internet. Your "advice" is speculation just as was my post.
Your responses to my post were nothing short of arrogant and condescending. I am certainly not the one who needs to take it down a couple of pegs.
I'm truly sorry that you do not like being told that your analysis is based on things that didn't actually happen and that your sources are likely bunk. If that's what you consider to be arrogant and condescending, then maybe Internet forums are not the place for you?
No, the sources could absolutely be right and you wrong.
I truly do not care one bit that you are calling me out for being rude.You came here and responded to my post in a completely impolite manner. You were absolutely arrogant and condescending by presenting your information as "factual" and mine as being wrong.
Perhaps, if you don't know how to be respectful to others you should have a thicker skin when called out on the carpet for it.
I don't think we'll see a studio update in the spring. I also wouldn't be surprised to see any update occur after March. I have no "inside" information but rather just my gut and its purely a guessI suppose the studio won't be updated in march.
As far as the Midnight color is concerned, it is merely a rumor but one I would highly believe.
Apple always gives a compelling reason to upgrade to a second-gen product by offering a unique color. It is expected, for example, to be the case with the next ULTRA watch which many are expecting will be offered in a dark color.
Same thing with the STUDIO. Initially, the Pro Minis were offered in Space Grey. It makes sense, in an effort to differentiate itself from the current M1 model, a Midnight color could be designated to the M2.