Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

riggles

macrumors 6502
Dec 2, 2013
301
14
If the card is rated at 170W TDP, you should be fine, as has been reported by a number of others with 6+8 pin cards that also fall below the 225W limit. If you're that worried, return the card and get a 6+6 pin card.
 

fifthmanstandin

macrumors member
Jul 11, 2009
69
0
You're allotted 225 Watts of power for a GPU: 6-Pin x 75W, 6-Pin x 75W, PCI x 75W.

Ok. so for my clarification: when you say "6-Pin x 75W" you're referring to the mini 6 pin pcie to 6 pin cables. When you say "PCI x 75W", you're referring to an 8 pin cable? If so, is the referred to 8 pin cable a mini 6 pin to 8 pin cable like I'd like to buy or is it the two molex to 8 pin I've got adapted now? Because I'd like to get my molex's back for my dvd drive. My primary concern was that buying and using a mini 6 pin to 8 pin was going to be a problem. I don't know what happens between that mini 6 pin side and that 8 pin side and if that's going to create a problem I want to avoid it.

----------

I'd get Hardware Monitor and check the actual power draw for yourself.


Just saw the second page of this thread sorry, I downloaded Hardware monitor from here http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/hwmonitor.html and it's reading out .862 V. And I have no idea what that means.
 

riggles

macrumors 6502
Dec 2, 2013
301
14
Ok. so for my clarification: when you say "6-Pin x 75W" you're referring to the mini 6 pin pcie to 6 pin cables. When you say "PCI x 75W", you're referring to an 8 pin cable?
...
My primary concern was that buying and using a mini 6 pin to 8 pin was going to be a problem. I don't know what happens between that mini 6 pin side and that 8 pin side and if that's going to create a problem I want to avoid it.
By "PCI x 75W" he means the PCIe card slot itself provides 75W of power, in addition to the 75W provided by each of the 6-pin connectors.

I think it would be wise to avoid using an 8-pin adapter, since it could signal the card that 150W are available from that one cable (which is not the case). That would be safer.
 

fifthmanstandin

macrumors member
Jul 11, 2009
69
0
So if I'm reading this right, the card is already pulling 75 watts from the slot itself and then has two available pcie on the mobo for 75 watts each. So the card running two six pin plus the pci slot pull is well over the card's power requirements. Verify that I'm understanding that right if you don't mind.

If so, that puts me at a lot more ease. So I can wire this with two six pins and get my molex's back on my dvd drive.
 

fifthmanstandin

macrumors member
Jul 11, 2009
69
0
Awesome.

Thanks again you guys and sorry for the involved line of questioning but I really want to understand what I'm doing before I risk something like burning up my pre-christmas present graph card that my girlfriend got me and catching hell lol.

You guys are great.
 

ActionableMango

macrumors G3
Sep 21, 2010
9,613
6,909
Actual measured power draw in a Mac Pro on the three 75W sources, running Furmark to stress the card to its maximum, on a GTX680:
68.52W
69.00W
63.12W

The GTX680 has a TDP of 195W. Your card, with a TDP of 170W, has even less power draw. And running normal software, even very demanding software, will use less power than Furmark.

I hope this puts your mind at ease.

But like I said earlier, if you want to know with absolute certainty, you can always get Hardware Monitor and check for yourself. In fact, it would contribute to the knowledge on these forums.
 

Draeconis

macrumors 6502a
May 6, 2008
987
281
This has been hotly debated. Evidence shows that an 8-pin card can pull way more power than the spec safely allows, but many people seem to be doing this just fine with no ill effect so far.

I can speak personally for a 6+8 GTX 680. It operates just fine with a 6-pin power cable connected directly to the 8-pin socket, no adapter needed. IIRC, the 770 is just a 680 with higher clock rates, so I would expect the same to be true for the 770, but I can't say for sure.

On the EVGA site, they note the TPD of the 680 2Gb is 190w, whereas the TPD of the 770 is stated as 250w. Your mileage may vary.
 

ActionableMango

macrumors G3
Sep 21, 2010
9,613
6,909
On the EVGA site, they note the TPD of the 680 2Gb is 190w, whereas the TPD of the 770 is stated as 250w. Your mileage may vary.

YMMV: Very true!

The EVGA GTX 285 has a TDP of 204W which is well under the 225W Mac Pro spec, but has been measured in actual use as pulling 110W from one of its 75W-rated 6-pin sockets... and that's from an official card sold by Apple for Mac Pros.
 

666sheep

macrumors 68040
Dec 7, 2009
3,686
292
Poland
I wonder what is maximum read from PCIe Booster current sensor. I've tested hard tweaked 7950, 7970 and R9 280x in my MP. Maximum read from single PCIe Booster didn't exceed 97W (or 8.1 Amps). Measured using Hardware Monitor and iStat. 7950 pulled ~240W during Furmark test, 280x about 270W.

Edit:

.
PCI Slot 1 12V Line: Max 38W
6 pin cable: Max 63W
8/6-pin cable: Max 128W

I've used 6/8 pin cable as well on mine 7970 (OCed) and 280x (stock), and max I've read was what I wrote above...
 
Last edited:

Varmann

macrumors regular
Jan 3, 2010
154
71
Actual measured power draw in a Mac Pro on the three 75W sources, running Furmark to stress the card to its maximum, on a GTX680:
68.52W
69.00W
63.12W

The GTX680 has a TDP of 195W. Your card, with a TDP of 170W, has even less power draw. And running normal software, even very demanding software, will use less power than Furmark.

I hope this puts your mind at ease.

But like I said earlier, if you want to know with absolute certainty, you can always get Hardware Monitor and check for yourself. In fact, it would contribute to the knowledge on these forums.

Seems like different cards manage the load balance differently.
I used hardware monitor on a downclocked 7970 and got these max readings during Luxmark and other tests. The load was surely not evenly distributed.

PCI Slot 1 12V Line: Max 38W
6 pin cable: Max 63W
8/6-pin cable: Max 128W
 

ActionableMango

macrumors G3
Sep 21, 2010
9,613
6,909
Wow. :eek:

That's beyond my personal comfort level, but I also am not aware anyone having a power problem with that card yet. :rolleyes:
 

Gav Mack

macrumors 68020
Jun 15, 2008
2,194
23
Sagittarius A*
Seems like different cards manage the load balance differently.
I used hardware monitor on a downclocked 7970 and got these max readings during Luxmark and other tests. The load was surely not evenly distributed.

PCI Slot 1 12V Line: Max 38W
6 pin cable: Max 63W
8/6-pin cable: Max 128W

I would double check that with another stat app. if 128 watts is true and it was my card I'd be putting my old baked 8800gt back in till I got another one!
 

Varmann

macrumors regular
Jan 3, 2010
154
71
PCI Slot 1 12V Line: Max 38W
6 pin cable: Max 63W
8/6-pin cable: Max 128WI
I would double check that with another stat app. if 128 watts is true and it was my card I'd be putting my old baked 8800gt back in till I got another one!

I did, iStat shows a similar pattern.
Thinking about it, from a design perspective, it makes much more sense than dividing the load equally.

It seems clever to divide the the load between the two dedicated cables (normally direct from the PSU) according to their rating, 2:1, while trying to minimise the load through the PCIe slot, since it passes through the motherboard.

If the load is divided equally then at 225W (TDP of my down clocked card), the "best" power source will only run at 50% while the 6pin and PCIe would be at their max rating.

I certainly was concerned by the is discovery. However, I did not buy the card to make heavy lifting, OpenCL or gaming. It is simply the first card that I come across that can handle my unusual display setup in a nice way.
I am almost never even close to draw 75W from the 6/8 pin cable.

Today I would have bought an 9750 instead, but I tried to be "smart" and buy something "future proof" for the unlikely event that Adobe suddenly made Lightroom GPU optimised :)

The lesson learned is that you should not only look at the TDP, it does not tell the whole truth.
 

freiheit

macrumors 6502a
Jul 20, 2004
643
90
California
Join MP's 2 6 pin mini PCIe to single 8 pin?

I think it is time for an electrical engineer's perspective on this...

Trimmed...

-JimJ

I would appreciate an electrical engineer's perspective on the idea of powering a card which has a single 8 pin PCIe connector (any of several GTX 760s) using a y-splitter drawing power from BOTH of the Mac Pro's mini 6 pin connectors. Is it acceptable to draw up to 150 watt over a y-splitter fed by 2 75 watt sources?

The next question is, has anyone found such a cable? Yes I know I _could_ use a single 6 pin to 8 pin and "fake it" but I personally would feel better with my no-longer-future-upgradable 2010 Mac Pro staying within the specs if possible. I have found a very small number of standard PCIe 2x6 pin to 1x8 pin cables but none with the Mac Pro's mini PCIe connectors.
 
Last edited:

MacVidCards

Suspended
Nov 17, 2008
6,096
1,056
Hollywood, CA
Some 760s ship with a simple 6 to 8 adapter.

The 2 @6 pins into 8 adapter are a dime a dozen.

They ship with most cards that require 8 pin plugs.

I take dozens to an electrical recycling center every couple of months.

If youy are in LA you can come by and get one for free, heck you can have a dozen.

There are many for sale on Ebay for cheap.

What I don't like about them is that they draw the current unevenly. Since the 8 pin side requires 5 grounds, they take 3 from one 6 pin and 2 from the other.
 

Kolvir

macrumors member
Jul 21, 2014
34
1
Iowa
Some 760s ship with a simple 6 to 8 adapter.

The 2 @6 pins into 8 adapter are a dime a dozen.

They ship with most cards that require 8 pin plugs.

What I don't like about them is that they draw the current unevenly. Since the 8 pin side requires 5 grounds, they take 3 from one 6 pin and 2 from the other.

So on the 760s that have a 8 pin and a 6 pin port, what do you recommend to using?
 

ou812

macrumors newbie
Aug 2, 2007
6
0
Radeon R9 280x DC2T 3gb installed into MacPro Early 2009

Great topic guys, so here is my latest findings. With the advent of Yosemite I have installed a Asus Radeon R9 280x DC2T 3 GB card into my 2009 MacPro tower. No drivers from Radeon Required! I am using an 8pin to 6 pin to smaller 6 pin and another regular 6 pin to smaller 6 pin to power this card from the MacPro. So yes both power plugs on motherboard are used to drive this card. I also have 5 hard drives in this tower 3, 3, 1.5, 1.5 and 1 terabyte and 1 240gb SSD drive in this unit. Optical drive moved to the outside of tower! My boot up drive is the SSD Kingston with Yosemite. In this tower is also the Caldigit USB 3/Esata card. I have x.6, x.7, x.8, x.9 as boot up drives as well in this tower. I will be testing soon the boot up from other OS's with this video card (which will probably not work. So for that I have a second Radeon card that I will put into another slot (lesser card) that should boot up with the other OS's. I sold my Radeon 5770 card which was a 1 gb video card (apple recommended card) of course. To power a 2nd card, I will have to use an outside PSU. There are a number of cards that will now work in the MacPro with Yosemite! See details on the card I installed here... http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/R9280XDC2T3GD5/ More to come!
 

pixxelpusher

macrumors member
Aug 1, 2011
92
17
I've just started to benchmark my system and out of interest sake thought I'd check my video card wattage to what's been posted here. It's a Mac Radeon HD 5870. I've run the GpuTest 0.7.0 FurMark stress test and checked the power consumption in Hardware Monitor (the max values are under load).

I'm a bit unsure as to what the PCI readings are exactly relating to, as I only have the 1 PCI card and it's in slot 1, could Hardware Monitor be mislabelling the results? I would have thought "PCIe Slot 1 12V Line" would be the main PCI slot and the 1 and 2 "12V Boost Line" would be the 2 6-pin cables?

But it's showing power draw on "PCIe Slot 2"?

Anyway the usage looks fairly evenly split under load, and weighted to the "PCIe Slot 1 12V Line" when idle.

Adding up the 3 PCI results comes to 193.9W which makes me think, as this card is rated as 228W would the Mac Pro be throttling the wattage of the card so it doesn't overload, and would this be affecting graphics performance?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-02-04 at 10.38.42 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-02-04 at 10.38.42 PM.png
    77.8 KB · Views: 321

avkdm

macrumors regular
Feb 14, 2012
160
42
FWIW and to add to peoples confusion on power requirements of this particular Galaxy GTX680 GPU.
I just put this GTX680 GC 4gb version 1x6 and 1x8 in my Mac Pro and it would NOT boot to desktop. I had Nvidia Web drivers enabled in Yosemite.
http://www.galaxytech.com/__EN_GB__...isStop=0&isPack=False&isPow=False&isSSD=False
I used just the 2x6 pin Mac cables that were feeding my factory dual 5770s. I get no boot to OSX but Win 7 Bootcamp tells me to plug in pcie power cables at boot. On a normal Win 7 box with 1x8 and 1x6 it boots fine. So it WANTS the 1x8 connection even though it may be drawing enough power to boot properly.
Edit. It's a non-reference design with custom power and cooling, so it's hard to tell how much power it wants,however on the website it quotes the std TDP power requirements of a regular GTX680 (195W) so to put an 8 pin adapter on will be my only solution for this particular GTX680 and do some measuring.
I quite frankly am not willing to risk it.
 
Last edited:

giodelgado

macrumors regular
Jan 6, 2008
117
18
FWIW and to add to peoples confusion on power requirements of this particular Galaxy GTX680 GPU.
I just put this GTX680 GC 4gb version 1x6 and 1x8 in my Mac Pro and it would NOT boot to desktop. I had Nvidia Web drivers enabled in Yosemite.
http://www.galaxytech.com/__EN_GB__...isStop=0&isPack=False&isPow=False&isSSD=False
I used just the 2x6 pin Mac cables that were feeding my factory dual 5770s. I get no boot to OSX but Win 7 Bootcamp tells me to plug in pcie power cables at boot. On a normal Win 7 box with 1x8 and 1x6 it boots fine. So it WANTS the 1x8 connection even though it may be drawing enough power to boot properly.
Edit. It's a non-reference design with custom power and cooling, so it's hard to tell how much power it wants,however on the website it quotes the std TDP power requirements of a regular GTX680 (195W) so to put an 8 pin adapter on will be my only solution for this particular GTX680 and do some measuring.
I quite frankly am not willing to risk it.

so... did you try it?... :rolleyes:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.