How does that compare to the kit lens "Link Here".
well:
the 50mm is a prime, which means you zoom with your feet.
the 17-85 zooms in and has Image Stabilzation
the 17-85 has an F stop of 4-5.6
How does that compare to the kit lens "Link Here".
All depends on what kit lens you are talking about. For example I had a Rebel XT that came with the 18-55mm USM (no IS) kit lens. I took some of my best landscape photos with that lens and a cheap CPL. However, I decided that i wanted better quality glass and built, so I purchased a Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 lens. This lens costs four or five times more than the kit lens (around $400.00-$500.00), but it has a fixed aperture of f2.8, it's fast-focusing, and quite sharp. I could have purchased the Canon's version instead, but it cost more than the Tamrom a few years ago.so if i were looking for an upgrade to the kit lens what am i looking for?
Well not that i see why your getting angry over someone else's choices. I am wondering what why a student does not need HDCP as you should know high bandwidth content protection is required for the playback for high definition content such as blu ray disk and therefor a screen with this ability ether over display port or HDMI will have a much longer life span for someone wanting to watch media content than one without HDCP.
I would not use the dell display i don't like the aesthetics nor feel of it, the closest i found to the Apple 30 inch was a samsung 30 inch that ran on display port unfortunately its due date of the 2nd quarter and i haven't seen it in the wild yet nor a GPU on the mac side to power it though i suspect it will be the same panel used in the apple refreshment. For me you can't get more "powerful" displays only ones your comfortable using.
When i was at the Apple store in Glasgow i had a good chance to use the Apple display and found the brightness and colour perfect for me and i didn't get a soar head, i done the same thing when buying my Macbook i had the sales rep bring out ones with the 2 different panels at the time and chose the one i was comfortable using.
And yes i understand showing of photos on a screen will not show them at there best and if i wanted to wow clients on a computer monitor the best bet would be to use a glossy display as that seems to wow the average person however for showing designs and websites pre proof print the Apple display will make the images look natural in most lighting conditions. The dell however would not ascetically match the Mac's especially the macbook pro or mac pro powering it and will not provide anything tangible over the Apple
over the Apple display at all and from most reviews both screens calibrated similar produce results with the Apple often coming on top, though i am not really wanting to get into an argument over a screen choice that i am sure you must know is a very personal thing, i am photo sensitive i really go out the way to find a screen to match me.
Not if you don't know what you're buying. The 50mm f/1.4 is a nice lens, but it only offers a half stop advantage over the f/1.8; its heavier and 3x more expensive. For some people looking for a small walkaround lens, the "nifty fifty" (1.8 aperture) is a better buy.
so if i were looking for an upgrade to the kit lens what am i looking for?
Not if you don't know what you're buying. The 50mm f/1.4 is a nice lens, but it only offers a half stop advantage over the f/1.8; its heavier and 3x more expensive. For some people looking for a small walkaround lens, the "nifty fifty" (1.8 aperture) is a better buy.
Have you held a Mark II 50mm 1.8? It has an awful feel to it. It feels like a plastic lens. If you're going to recomend this lens, at least encourage her to find a used Mark I, which has a much more solid feel to it. But it much more difficult to come across..............
I'm only angry because you think I'm getting angry, you can't interpret somebody's emotions through simple text. Why are you still talking about the Dell? I'm not, I just used it to make a point, stop taking things personally. Aesthetics are nice but aren't necessary.
So how do you propose you're going to play with your Hi-def content when a MBP doesn't even have a Blue-Ray drive? Why buy the monitor if you're going to wait a year anyway for the upgrade? Like I said it's not necessary for a student, plus reading ahead it seems you're focusing on the wrong things with your work. You're asking what the difference is between a kit lens and a prime lens?
I think you need to read up on photography before spending all your money and all you've said you're going to do with HDCP is play movies anyway, is that right? Simply put you're wasting your money as a student, you don't need cutting edge.
But yes it is a personal choice so enjoy it.
The f1.4 50mm Lens weighs nothing and for £200 its a better bargain over the f1.8 version simply for its optics. My housemate had the f1.8 50mm and I have a f1.4 50mm so I've had experience with both and my housemate regretted buying his.
Ah i see you believe because i am a student i don't need cutting edge, So i should not hold of with a screen with HDCP and buy one now that does not have HDCP then when it does have HDCP buy one again. That sounds expensive and i am a student of Multimedia development on my second degree my first being in Technical Support.
I also think i did say i would be looking for ether a macpro or macbook pro depending on budget i am currently swinging more to the Mac pro so i can upgrade it with blu ray and a HDCP compatible GPU though depending on the next macbook pro specs i may be more swayed towards that.
A display with HDCP is nothing to do with photography and is only to do with playing back hi definition movies and i suspect HDCP will be required for renting HD content from iTunes with a computer so i would like to make sure the display will last. I tend to keep displays for many years and get a good one that will last.
And i must say i have quite a bit of money to waste as a student, i am in a full time job earning £860 a month, with a £480 a month extra from the college and i am earning £1000 on a freelance job i am doing converting a site to a custom CMS solution. So i have got some fiancees in place to fund some projects just now and hopefully i mite even manage a large format printer but that will depend on being able to rent some office space for the room to store it.
And yes i need to read up a lot on photography but i am a very hands on person since i hate to read so i think i'll go for the D40 with kit lens, a 8 GB CF card, tripod, and a carry bag. I'll look at some lighting and background sets in the new year for portrait work.
I am a student myself btw and I earn more than you. It's not about how much you earn, its how much you're spending that is the topic of conversation... and as far as I know, you need only Apple TV to rent HD content from iTunes.
Also the other important bits I noticed from your previous comment is 'I have' and 'to waste', so whatever.
ICollege here is free and comes with a student loan that repayments are taken out of my wages when i start earning over £15K at around £15 a month with the option to pay it of sooner if i please.
if you want the 30" - can anything else drive it?
Leigh-
I find it interesting that you think one cannot hold down a full job and go to school. I work 60 hours and go to school for 12-15 credit hours a semester. It's hard, but I have a mortgage to pay, and school is not exactly cheap.
Although hearing of free tuition in the UK does make me cry a little. I wish the US was that forward thinking.
I'm curious about this. Which UK university is 'free'? I'm pretty sure we're stung for tuition fees, even if they get offloaded as debt. I'm not so keen on what will be my £18k+ debt from my three year degree (tuition fees, student loan).
Of the canons, last time I checked the 40D was the obvious choice, the 450D wasn't sufficiently cheaper. Unless weight is an issue. I assume when you suddenly mentioned the 'D40', a Nikon, it was a typo.
If you can afford it, a Mac Pro of some description is lovely. Otherwise a MBP a guess, if you want the 30" - can anything else drive it?
I'm not sure how you're managing to do a degree and hold down a full time job. Sounds nuts. I suppose cube is just concerned you're splurging on things which won't improve results, per se, when you could be saving the money for a house, or feeding the poor, buying better lenses, or something. There is some validity to his viewpoint. Ultimately, of course, it's your choice.
I don't think it would be possible where I am, Oxford, but the terms are quite short and they therefore pack a lot in. Oxford don't let you have a job, full stop, during term time. I'm not sure what a 'credit hour' is, we don't have such a system. At many unis in England people do work but 60 hours a week would make it impossible to attend most of the course, perhaps one could fit in something more flexible, like English, if you killed yourself over it. Good luck to you, it must be tough!
Tuition in the UK isn't free. Every uni. barring perhaps two, charge something over £3300/year tuition fees. Not massive compared to some US places, but not free. They may be able to charge more for non-first degrees and such, but I am unsure. Generally people qualify for loans and such, so it becomes a debt.
Anyhow, a digression somewhat from the topic. Apologies.
Don't speak for the UK when you live in England, Scotland runs a very different system.
Apologies, you are of course correct, I should have typed 'England' for some reason I just assumed you were here when you used pounds. As England has a larger population it is generally a correct one. I mean no offence! Scotland's system is far superior.
Your argument about population and supporting the poor is balls though, western lifestyles are a big problem and adding product hardly decreases human load on the world. I was being off the cuff on 'feeding the poor' I meant, in general something to help those less fortunate (I most certainly do not do my bit at present, working on it).
AlaskaMoose what font is the book in, and is it available as an e-book. I can read books in a sanf serf font and use a pink sheet over it to help the words from jumping about but if its a serf font i have to get it re written for my by my friend that sometimes takes a lot of time depending on the book if we can't find a e-book version.
Aye well we use £ sterling up here too lol.
My argument about the population problem is correct however it is rather unpleasant and unpopular the truth of the mater is too many humans on too small a planet to support them all.
To help thoughts less fortunate is something i do weekly to support a local charity for cats. And i pay out to a few other animal charity's and i fund an animal rights awareness group also local to my area that informs people of were some of there food comes from i.e battery farming.
I've noticed through this conversation that you speak very boldly, why is that? It seems you won't waiver from your viewpoint whether its 30 inch monitors to feeding the 3rd world. As is 'my argument... is correct' when the situation of feeding everybody, clearly isn't so binary as you think it is.