One thing I missed before is that all the other CPU's above the stock 3.5/8c have Turbo Boost up to 4.4GHz, which is faster than the 3.5/8c Turbo boost of 4.0Ghz.
Also RAM speed increases from 2666MHz to 2933MHz.
Lou
Last edited:
One thing I missed before is that all the other CPU's above the stock 3.5/8c have Turbo Boost up to 4.4GHz, which is faster than the 3.5/8c Turbo boost of 4.0Ghz.
Congratulations it makes a significant difference to performance. Confirming I also successfully replaced my stock 8 core with a 28 core CPU. I wish I had the manual at the time! Thankfully it took 2 attempts, the issue being the tightening of the screws. It’s pretty easy to do though and well worth it if you want a rocket ship!I swapped my stock 12 core for a used retail 24 core W-3265M that i bought on eBay for around 1000 euros. It took three attempts to get it right because i did have the amber light flashing on boot. Thanks to this topic and the service manual i learned a lot. So thank you to everyone contributing here since there's no step by step Youtube tutorial on this. What worked for me is cleaning the new CPU's contacts with alcohol and very carefully tightening the two bolts, counting the rotations to get it seated properly. This is critical. After that it was plug and play. I'm on Monterey 12.2.1 and now enjoying a significant speed bump in Final Cut Pro.
It's a different socket, LGA4189, while MacPro7,1 have LGA3647. Zero chances.What are the odds that the Xeon W-3300 will work in the MacPro7,1? It's supposed to be in the new MacPro.
That’s a rumor from almost a year ago for being in next Mac Pro. Wouldn’t count on it.What are the odds that the Xeon W-3300 will work in the MacPro7,1? It's supposed to be in the new MacPro.
I completely agree, said the same thing in a different thread elsewhere. People gushing over the specs of the new MacStudio really underestimate the expandability of PCI-e slots the 7,1 and even the 5,1 have, especially when it comes to HBA cards (ATTO, High-Point, Areca) to expand storage solutions based off large multiple RAID arrays of HDD or SSDs. Thunderbolt 3/4 might boast high speeds, but reliability and sustained read/writes perhaps not as much.7.1 will not die as fast as people think… most of the professionals need PCIe Slots which the AS MacPro won’t have
Hi rondocap!After almost a year of doing the 28 Core W3275m upgrade to 2 Mac Pros, both have worked flawlessly and have had no issues or gremlins at all - which is a good thing since it was so much cheaper than getting that option directly from Apple.
That's one of the great things about the Mac Pro - upgradability. Hopefully the AS version maintains some aspects of that...
I'm in the same boat, so curious about answers. I tested the mac studio m1 ultra vs my 16 core and it BLEW it out of the water in after effects. A comp that took 5 minutes on my mac pro rendered in 3 minutes on the mac studio. I doubt that a 28 core could beat that. The m1 version of after effects is just so well optimized.. on the other hand..it might just be on par for final render.Hi rondocap!
Im considering to upgrade my MacPro from 16 cores to the 24 or the 28 cores, you can get those processors around 1000$ these days.
What would you say?
Im working mainly on after effects, and very seldom on Cinema4d.
After effects support multiple cores for rendering, but nut sure if the lower speed clock will make it react slower.
The other option is to get an M1 Ultra but that's 4x the price of the upgrade...
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Tala,Hi rondocap!
Im considering to upgrade my MacPro from 16 cores to the 24 or the 28 cores, you can get those processors around 1000$ these days.
What would you say?
Im working mainly on after effects, and very seldom on Cinema4d.
After effects support multiple cores for rendering, but nut sure if the lower speed clock will make it react slower.
The other option is to get an M1 Ultra but that's 4x the price of the upgrade...
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Oh man, thanks for writing!I'm in the same boat, so curious about answers. I tested the mac studio m1 ultra vs my 16 core and it BLEW it out of the water in after effects. A comp that took 5 minutes on my mac pro rendered in 3 minutes on the mac studio. I doubt that a 28 core could beat that. The m1 version of after effects is just so well optimized.. on the other hand..it might just be on par for final render.
Thanks Tom,Tala,
Be aware: the $1000US CPUs seem to all be "QS" models. The tray models still seem to be $@2300US or so. There is a reason. If you search this site you'll find that the QS versions put into the 7,1 Mac Pro sometime have problems.
Just so you have some idea of what the downside might be,
Tom
Ive been debating over the last months if should go for a QS 28 or a retail 24 , im not sure what the downsides of the QS could be, been asking around and most people seem happy with their cheap qs xeon processor. Could you please elaborate your opinion, I would really appreciate that.Tala,
Be aware: the $1000US CPUs seem to all be "QS" models. The tray models still seem to be $@2300US or so. There is a reason. If you search this site you'll find that the QS versions put into the 7,1 Mac Pro sometime have problems.
Just so you have some idea of what the downside might be,
Tom
Ive been debating over the last months if should go for a QS 28 or a retail 24 , im not sure what the downsides of the QS could be, been asking around and most people seem happy with their cheap qs xeon processor. Could you please elaborate your opinion, I would really appreciate that.