Thanks much for the response!
I don’t know… They said “Most”. When you take into account the 16 of Apple’s 147,000 employees that have complaints… 146,984 IS Most of 147,000.Apparently not 🙄
That's PR talk. You're ignoring what employees have actually said and were quoted saying.Most Apple employees are incredibly happy to be contributing to changing the world. Apple is still ranked pretty much the best corporation to work for on earth.
Do some employees sometimes wish they were paid more and had better conditions? Sure. But who doesn't sometimes feel like that?
That's PR talk. You're ignoring what employees have actually said and were quoted saying.
But a company's HR department's duty is to respond and investigate employee complaints, not to brush them off as they did.I'm not ignoring it. I'm saying you'll always find employees who are unhappy, have negative things to say about their employer, and have grand ideas about how they believe things could be run better.
The CareerBliss data shows Apple is doing a pretty spectacular job, given their size.
What if, as HR, you respond, investigate and find that the employees weren’t the sterling arbiters of truth that they claimed to be? Do you take action on their false claims just so they feel like they were heard?But a company's HR department's duty is to respond and investigate employee complaints, not to brush them off as they did.
0.1%? How about 0.010884% because that’s the percentage of 147,000 these 16 are. And where does it end? For example, if they were to have a retail employee that was hired yesterday complaining that they should be VP of marketing, their first thought should NOT be, “UH oh, they’re complaining, how quickly can we make them a VP?!” In a lot of cases “addressing complaints” must end with “No”.I'm glad Apple's ratings are good. I'd like to know whether they are that good among Apple Store employees and other lowest paid employees specifically. In any case, if 0.1% of the employees have valid complaints, they have to be addressed.
HR exist to protect the company, not the employee. Anyone who's voiced a concern with HR the complaint is dealt with in a manner that keeps the public image clean. If it's good PR for the company punish the one causing the problem, they will do so with much fanfare. If it would be bad PR, they'll deal with the snitch secretly. Snitches get stitches. Capisce? This usually means low level employees are thrown under the bus.But a company's HR department's duty is to respond and investigate employee complaints, not to brush them off as they did.
HR exist to protect the company, not the employee. Anyone who's voiced a concern with HR the complaint is dealt with in a manner that keeps the public image clean. If it's good PR for the company punish the one causing the problem, they will do so with much fanfare. If it would be bad PR, they'll deal with the snitch secretly. Snitches get stitches. Capisce? This usually means low level employees are thrown under the bus.
This poster is mostly PR talk in majority of their posts, it’s quite sus to be honest.That's PR talk. You're ignoring what employees have actually said and were quoted saying.