Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dell released their newest ultrasharp model ,U2723QE, U3223QE ultrasharp monitor

E

eret9616

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Sep 25, 2021
28
43
dell released their newest ultrasharp model, looks like this may be a cheap alternative and an enough good monitor for mac, 2000:1 contrast, not as good as apple display, but its not expensive

u2723qe
u3223qe


spec:
98% DCI-P3
2000:1 contrast
90w type-c
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: robotica, sydneysider88, satchmo and 7 others
D

davvid97

macrumors member
Jul 23, 2015
58
56
Unexpected, and they seem to deliver it within 3 working days, wish there were more info online about it, but I am super curious about the IPS Black, it may be a great display!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baymann and bsmr
M

MacRazySwe

macrumors 65816
Aug 7, 2007
1,205
1,083
Looks really good, just what I'm after! They also released a 30" 16:10 of the same model.

EDIT: The 30" does not offer 4K.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Cape Dave
C

chacrat

macrumors member
Feb 17, 2021
31
9
Is the U2720Q so good for Mac ? Most people here say it is very good but I guess the text cannot be as sharp as a monitor having 180+ ppi. This is real question as I am thinking of selling my 24 inch 4k monitor and buy this new ultrasharp :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gvmelbrty and Cape Dave
N

nquinn

macrumors 6502a
Jun 25, 2020
829
621
Resolution too low IMO. The 27" is only 1440p and ~ 106ppi, nowhere close to retina.

The 32 (31.5") is a little better at ~ 140ppi.

Neither close to 180ppi+ of LG 4k/5k models.

For $700, between the low ppi and low brightness these monitors don't make sense at all to me. I'd personally give up 3 inches and get the 24" LG Ultrafine 4k for $700 (maybe $600 on sale)
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko and jdb8167
MBAir2010

MBAir2010

macrumors 604
May 30, 2018
6,975
6,354
there
this would be a great monitor to watch Mount Everest expeditions on then
because the scene looks like the Himalayan peak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
C

Christopher Kim

macrumors 6502a
Nov 18, 2016
768
741
Looks pretty nice. Being 4K, each having 400cd/m2 brightness, and being able to deliver 90W PD through USB-C with a decent hub on monitor means it can effectively act similar to the LG UltraFines w/ Thunderbolt 3 to be a 1-cable solution directly from MBP to monitor.
 
uller6

uller6

macrumors 65816
May 14, 2010
1,073
1,780
Christopher Kim said:
Looks pretty nice. Being 4K, each having 400cd/m2 brightness, and being able to deliver 90W PD through USB-C with a decent hub on monitor means it can effectively act similar to the LG UltraFines w/ Thunderbolt 3 to be a 1-cable solution directly from MBP to monitor.
Click to expand...
It says 350 cd/m2 on their website, which isn't anything to write home about. The LG ultra fines had 500 cd/m2 brightness, which is noticeable.

Edit: I swear I went to the Dell website and saw the 350 nits value. But, someone pointed out that they're actually 400 nits. I went back and checked, and they are indeed 400 nits.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko and WP31
turbineseaplane

turbineseaplane

macrumors P6
Mar 19, 2008
17,469
40,326
Amethyst1 said:
WQXGA monitors have never been cheap, so… nice to see Dell continue the trend. ;)
Click to expand...

Yeah I know. I still just think it’s a bit much in this day and age.

It’s not even a Premier Color one either!
Just a normal “ultra sharp”

(I’m unclear what the differentiation in their lines now is honestly)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cape Dave
J

Jim Lahey

macrumors 68030
Apr 8, 2014
2,751
5,723
chacrat said:
Is the U2720Q so good for Mac ? Most people here say it is very good but I guess the text cannot be as sharp as a monitor having 180+ ppi. This is real question as I am thinking of selling my 24 inch 4k monitor and buy this new ultrasharp :)
Click to expand...

I use this monitor. It’s very good but don’t expect inky blacks. Fine for general use but I’d think twice before using it to watch movies.
 
JanoschR

JanoschR

macrumors 6502
Oct 1, 2011
333
1,082
Germany
History keeps repeating itself and there is still no non-Apple monitor that you should buy. The LG 5k comes close but it is from 2016 (!), is ugly and has a lot of minor flaws (we have a few of them in the office). We also have the XDR and it is night and day.
 
D

davvid97

macrumors member
Jul 23, 2015
58
56
It is 400 (brightness) Dell site U3223QE
Also it is interesting that:
"World’s first 27" and 31.5" 4K monitors which allow daisy chaining of an additional 4K monitor at full resolution via USB-C—enabled by Display Stream Compression (DSC)"
Will 2 of them daisy chained work with M1 Macs with no adapters needed then?
 
D

DanielFNG

macrumors newbie
Apr 11, 2019
5
0
I'm torn on picking this up. I assume any rumored Apple stand-alone monitor at 27 inch size would be considerably more expensive than this guy, for those more familiar with Apple's pricing than me?

Just been looking for a 4K+ 27inch display with integrated USB-C for a while now. Really dislike the blurriness of fonts on my 27 inch 1440p display.
 
Moonjumper

Moonjumper

macrumors 68030
Jun 20, 2009
2,749
2,937
Lincoln, UK
turbineseaplane said:
I love 16:10 and 30" monitors, but c'mon Dell

$1050 for a 2560x1600 60hz screen -- in 2022?
Click to expand...
A 30" 16:10 5120x3200 monitor would be amazing. Basically a retina version of the old Apple 30" Cinema Display. The 27" iMac is a retina version of the old Apple 27" Cinema Display, so it would be a nice progression, but I doubt we will see it.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 2ndStreet, gvmelbrty, fisherman188 and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom