I'm going to start with "you don't know me". Of course, this is an anonymous internet board and all I know are posts that I read and respond to the posts.1. I think the CEO has done an excellent job of making AAPL a highly valuable company for himself and shareholders. As an investor, you can’t get much better.
2. I love the products. Apple makes excellent products, and gives users what they ask for. For the long term value of AAPL, I prefer to produce more innovation. Every Apple product I have bought except the latest iPad mini has exceeded my expectations.
3. I think they are a gigantic company that has too much power and abuses it. I think they have created standards in certain parts of the ecosystem, and I believe those parts would be better use to allow licensing to FRAND access to things like iMessage. I don’t think Beeper should be able to steal the Apple tech, but I think all device manufacturers should be able to use the iMessage technology as a standard and pay AAPL a licensing under FRAND licensing as a standard within the USA.
4. And on and what on?
A person can love Apple products and disagree with how it markets itself and how it does business. You don’t know me and you make a lot of assumptions that aren’t even close to true. I believe Apple has created a new standard for messaging, and I believe it should be licensed the same way Apple Pay’s for licensing via FRAND licenses to tech once owned exclusively to sell cell phone manufacturers but now considered a standard as it’s in the best interest for all to have access to it.
I am not against competition, I am for it. I believe companies have been allowed to get to absurd sizes that benefit very few people. As someone who runs an investment company, I think the wealthiest 1% make far too much money and that companies should be held accountable to their employees and society at the same rate as their shareholders. There has to be a better solution if we will allow mega corporations to dominate and destroy competition.
I think Apple, as long as it's products are inherently safe, and as long as it's business practices are in compliance with existing regulations, should be allowed to have it's closed ecosystem. Apple got to where it was by producing products and services that people want to buy it got there by being popular. Ask Blackberry if it needed to be popular. And if somehow Apple didn't fit into my framework there are hundreds of other cell phone companies that I could buy from. Contrast that to a energy companies who basically holds us hostage.
As far as the 1%, there are 1% in every corner of the globe. That these 1% are too powerful is another conversation for another day, but if you believe the 1% destroy competition the let's start regulating the areas where it's not possible to complete.
Let's start with cell phone companies. It's a virtually closed system because the resource you needed is regulated and sold off by the government, also cable franchises are regulated by local government. There are other examples, but there is a balance between innovation and "destroying competition". Of course, you and I probably won't agree on what that balance is and how much regulation needs to be put on the books.