Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A brain surgeon using the wrong tools would be absolutely life threatening. Not a good analogy. I realised when I contributed to this thread my comments would not get much traction - most people here are tech heads after all. I will bow out now and just accept that you guys feel that specs trump creativity.
Sorry but that’s just nonsense.

Yes you can take a great picture on a disposable camera, or a smartphone, or with a box and pinhole if you like. You’re not being an artist amongst the geeks by pointing that out, you’re just stating the absolute obvious.

But here’s the thing; all those devices (like any) are LIMITED. There are clear limitations not only to the image quality you can achieve in technical terms, but also the level of artistic or creative control you can achieve. Photography is a creative science and there are whole realms of control in terms of exposure, focus, depth of field, etc which you simply cannot wield with an iPhone or similar. So yes, equipment and technology does make a difference, even - or especially - to the best and most creative photographers.

Where it doesn’t so much, and where an iPhone is as good as anything, is to people like the OP who essentially just want to take snaps and can’t really tell the difference. That’s the point here.
 
The best camera is the one you have.

It takes planning and effort to lug my DSLR and lenses wherever I go. If my intention is to spend a day shooting, then the DSLR wins. If I see something worth capturing and only have my phone with me, it wins.

The DSLR can print larger and survive more post processing. It gives a broader range of lenses for specific kinds of shots. The phone is always in your pocket and the form factor encourages experimentation and capturing images in a way you may not think of with a bulky camera on a tripod or neck strap.

Sometimes creativity comes from expanding the possibilities, sometimes it comes from working within limitations.
 
The best camera is the one you have.

It takes planning and effort to lug my DSLR and lenses wherever I go. If my intention is to spend a day shooting, then the DSLR wins. If I see something worth capturing and only have my phone with me, it wins.

The DSLR can print larger and survive more post processing. It gives a broader range of lenses for specific kinds of shots. The phone is always in your pocket and the form factor encourages experimentation and capturing images in a way you may not think of with a bulky camera on a tripod or neck strap.

Sometimes creativity comes from expanding the possibilities, sometimes it comes from working within limitations.
Bear in mind the op is talking about a fuji x100f, which is a pretty small and self contained camera that’s very easy to carry, but produces DSLR results. If your DSLR is that much trouble to take anywhere, maybe you should look into mirrorless
 
  • Like
Reactions: sean000
Wow! Thank you for your insight post. Huge help. I use my prime 35mm lens 99% of the time. My other lens is huge lol. I even have a mid end manfrotto Tripod which rarely use that is only collecting dust. I have no idea what a flashgun is but I will look into it. I have one of those huge diffuser attachments for the flash as well but not taking advantage of it. Thanks again.

You'd be amazed at what you can do with a tripod... especially playing around with long exposures. You can also see a difference in many detailed shots like landscapes when you use a tripod. It also helps when you wan to blend exposures, experiment with focus stacking, use a neutral density filter, get a shot perfectly leveled and lined up, etc. Modern cameras with better high ISO and handheld stabilization technology have made the tripod less necessary than it used to be for some photos, but a tripod can still help you get the best out of your gear. I probably only use mind for about 10 to 20 % of my shots, but those often end up being some of my best photos. I like working with a tripod because it makes me slow down and really fine-tune the composition and exposure.

A flashgun is just an external flash that you either attach to the top of the camera or use wirelessly while it is off camera. They can range in price from well under $100 to many hundreds of dollars. You don't need to spend a lot to get a good flashgun, but you might have to spend more (or buy used) to get one that will work wirelessly with your Nikon. The primary advantage when using it on the camera is that it gets the flash higher from the camera, and it allows you to angle the flash so it bounces off walls and ceilings. A diffuser placed around the built-in flash certainly helps soften the light, but it's still a direct flash source. Bouncing the flash makes the light even more evenly distributed, but results depend on what you have to bounce off of. High ceilings and dark walls aren't good reflectors.

It sounds like you already have a very capable kit. The 35mm prime is my favorite focal length for general photography on cameras like your D7000. Many famous photographers throughout history shot everything (or almost everything) with a single focal length. You could use their example to justify either a D7000 with a 35mm prime or a smartphone with only one or two focal lengths. Personally I would rather shoot with a D7000 because of the viewfinder, manual controls, comfortable ergonomics, and overall superior image quality. I'd rather carry an iPhone X. :D And for some photos that iPhone X will help me capture exactly what I want with excellent results. For other photos the D7000 will produce better results. When it comes to video, I'd probably go with the 4K capability of the iPhone X.

I wouldn't think of the iPhone X as a DSLR replacement, but simply as another piece of camera kit that can compliment your DSLR. Whether or not you need the DSLR in addition to your iPhone really comes down to your needs and preferences as a photographer. I've seen iPhone photos printed large in galleries that looked great from an artistic perspective. These were taken on older iPhones (or perhaps Android phones) so the technical quality wasn't up there with the prints out of better cameras (or modern smartphones), but technical quality isn't everything. A great photo can transcend technical flaws. That said I think your D7000 will give you more to play with if you want to learn and develop as a photographer. On the other hand if you're an amateur like me it should be a fun process, so ultimately you should use what you like.

Sean
 
The best camera is the one you have.

It takes planning and effort to lug my DSLR and lenses wherever I go. If my intention is to spend a day shooting, then the DSLR wins. If I see something worth capturing and only have my phone with me, it wins.

The DSLR can print larger and survive more post processing. It gives a broader range of lenses for specific kinds of shots. The phone is always in your pocket and the form factor encourages experimentation and capturing images in a way you may not think of with a bulky camera on a tripod or neck strap.

Sometimes creativity comes from expanding the possibilities, sometimes it comes from working within limitations.

Agree 100%.

Also for some people, the cost and learning curve involved with DSLR equipment is a barrier. They want to learn photography, but not that part. They just want to learn about subject, composition, lighting, and post-processing techniques. But they aren't able to or interested in spending the dollars and time to deal with a DSLR. That's where a good smartphone comes in. An iPhone 8 or X can do a whole lot more than a standard point-and-shoot from 10 years ago, and gives one a lot of room to learn about photography techniques.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid
Bear in mind the op is talking about a fuji x100f, which is a pretty small and self contained camera that’s very easy to carry, but produces DSLR results. If your DSLR is that much trouble to take anywhere, maybe you should look into mirrorless

Yeah... anyone who appreciate's Apple's ability to combine jaw-dropping technology with beautiful design and construction should check out a camera like the x100f or an interchangeable lens mirrorless camera like the Olympus PEN F. These compact designs pack a lot of camera into very small bodies. Of course there are less expensive options for small but high quality cameras, but these are notable for the design and manual controls.

I started shooting Nikon DSLR's in 2004, but when my first child was born in 2010 I decided I needed more portable camera gear. That started with a Panasonic GF1 and 20mm f/1.7 pancake. I still use the pancake with my Olympus OM-D E-M5 and it's a very easy combo to carry. Even with an Oly f/2.8 zoom mounted the size of the combo is way smaller than my Nikon D200 with a similar zoom attached. That said even a tiny camera body with a pancake lens, or a small P&S, is still a chunk to put in your pocket. I carry the E-M5 with a lens or two almost every day, because it doesn't take up much room in my bag, but there are still plenty of times when I leave it and my bag behind. That makes me appreciate the improvements to smartphone cameras, even though I'd rather be looking through the viewfinder of a dedicated camera.


Sean
 
An exhibition of photographs taken by pro photographers using ultra-cheap disposable cameras provides food for thought. So often people focus on the technology rather than their creative picture-making skills.

http://www.indoek.com/archives/22611
My son-in-law works for the NY Post and one of his favorite 9/11 stories is of a photographer (a Pulitzer winner, but can't remember their name right now) who was downtown near the Towers when they were hit BUT she was on her way to a business meeting so did not have their normal kit and ran into a store and purchased a bunch of disposable cameras. Many made various newspapers and outlets.
It is almost NEVER the camera but always the photographer BEHIND the camera!
 
  • Like
Reactions: scgf and redman042
My son-in-law works for the NY Post and one of his favorite 9/11 stories is of a photographer (a Pulitzer winner, but can't remember their name right now) who was downtown near the Towers when they were hit BUT she was on her way to a business meeting so did not have their normal kit and ran into a store and purchased a bunch of disposable cameras. Many made various newspapers and outlets.
It is almost NEVER the camera but always the photographer BEHIND the camera!

Well, this is an example of the subject and timing mattering far more than the technical quality. Just look at how many famous photographs in photojournalism are taken by amateurs using smartphones these days. When it comes to photojournalism, being the right place at the right time (or the wrong place at the wrong time... depending on the event and your perspective) is everything. Well, that and the photographer's bravery/willingness to get the shot that tells the story.

I get what you are saying though: Of course the photographer is the most important element, but photography enthusiasts and pros typically choose high-end or specialty cameras for good reasons. Professionals often work with multiple cameras as well for redundancy and flexibility. Yes it's the person who wields that tool that matters most, but sometimes having the right tool matters just as much. Interchangeable lens cameras exist because no single lens is the best tool for all types of photos. Yes if you give an iPhone X to an excellent photographer for a day you will see some excellent photographs, but you probably won't see all the photographs the photographer wished they could have gotten (and some of the photos might not be exactly the composition/perspective the photographer wanted), because it just wasn't the right tool for every photographic opportunity they encountered.
 
Last edited:
Getting a better camera will not make anyone a better photographer.
A technical good quality photo from the perspective of clarity, range etc does not make a good or great photograph in and of itself.

A few of quotes from one of the all time greats:

- A good photograph is knowing where to stand

- There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept

- There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs
 
  • Like
Reactions: redman042 and scgf
This looks interesting. I would consider it just for the fisheye, because I love using a fisheye on my Olympus. Ultra wide and macro would be nice too. The whole kit would cost less than many mirrorless or DSLR lenses. Now if only they’d make a case with Bluetooth dials that control aperture, shutter speed, and exposure comp things would be really promising. No it still wouldn’t replace a dedicated camera kit for me, but it would make the iPhone X a more versatile pocket camera.
https://www.shopmoment.com/iphone-x-moment-cases-and-lenses
 
For gimbals, go for the Smooth Q or Smooth 3 by Zhiyun. If anyone knows of any better alternatives please let me know. From what I read the DJI osmo mobile has issues if the smartphone has built in OIS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyeseeyou
Getting a better camera will not make anyone a better photographer.
A technical good quality photo from the perspective of clarity, range etc does not make a good or great photograph in and of itself.

A few of quotes from one of the all time greats:

- A good photograph is knowing where to stand

- There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept

- There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs
The OP already owns a far better camera, but is surprised/pleased to find that his photos from the iPhone don’t look any worse - the reason being, he wasn’t taking very good pictures in the first place.

If you actually care about photography and are striving to take better pictures, a better camera will help. End of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyeseeyou
The OP already owns a far better camera, but is surprised/pleased to find that his photos from the iPhone don’t look any worse - the reason being, he wasn’t taking very good pictures in the first place.

If you actually care about photography and are striving to take better pictures, a better camera will help. End of.

I say again, a better camera will not make someone a better photographer. That’s just chasing a rabbit down a very silly hole. :p
 
I say again, a better camera will not make someone a better photographer. That’s just chasing a rabbit down a very silly hole. :p
I’m not really sure if you’re arguing with me or not. I’ve certainly not said that a better camera will make anyone a better photographer, but it will help someone who wants to learn and develop their photography to take better pictures, more creatively and in more situations.

To torture an analogy, a great racing driver will be quick in a Kia, but they’ll be a heck of a lot faster and more capable in a Ferrrai.

A poor driver OTOH won’t get very far in either.
 
To torture an analogy, a great racing driver will be quick in a Kia, but they’ll be a heck of a lot faster and more capable in a Ferrrai.

A poor driver OTOH won’t get very far in either.

No, the poor driver will get to the desired destination easily in the KIA but won't arrive in the Ferrari. Good point, you shouldn't put a professional camera in a newb's hand, instead of a device that is supporting this person shooting a picture like an iPhone :p
 
No, the poor driver will get to the desired destination easily in the KIA but won't arrive in the Ferrari. Good point, you shouldn't put a professional camera in a newb's hand, instead of a device that is supporting this person shooting a picture like an iPhone :p
Yes because it’s impossible to crash a Kia or take a bad picture in an iPhone o_O
 
The OP already owns a far better camera, but is surprised/pleased to find that his photos from the iPhone don’t look any worse - the reason being, he wasn’t taking very good pictures in the first place.

If you actually care about photography and are striving to take better pictures, a better camera will help. End of.

Now we’re attacking his photography skills. Geez this whole discussion must really offend you.
 
Last edited:
Now we’re attacking his photography skills. Geez this whole discussion must really offend you.
He can’t tell the difference between his iPhone snaps and his Fuji’s, and doesn’t know why he owns the latter. Trust me, his photography skills aren’t in question.
 
I don’t think there is any mobile phone in existence that replaces the enjoyment and skill needed to take a good photograph on a proper DSLR.

I think filter apps and Instagram have fooled a generation into believing an average point and shoot photograph is something great. It’s the photographer and not entirely the equipment I know, but no phone can compete with good glass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
I say again, a better camera will not make someone a better photographer. That’s just chasing a rabbit down a very silly hole. :p

No...of course it won't in and of itself, but a better camera can be better for learning. In fact the first time I went from a compact P&S to a DSLR back in 2004, it took me time to learn the larger sensor camera well enough that I could produce photos as good as my P&S could create so effortlessly. Once I learned what I needed to learn, I was able to really utilize the superior sensor and optics in the DSLR to produce better photos than I was getting out of my compact P&S.

Personally I would argue that the best camera to learn the fundamentals of photography on is one that offers manual controls for aperture, shutter speed, ISO, focus; a large enough sensor and a fast prime lens so you can control depth of field without any software gimmickry; and ideally a tripod. While the iPhone can allow you to manually control the exposure and focus settings, using a third party app, the depth of field on such a small sensor is so large that you can't really control depth of field without the software tricks (unless you're shooting macro). For true DOF control you need a fast lens paired with a larger sensor. I'm not talking about spending $1,000 on a DSLR and another $500 to $1,000 on a lens. A great starter camera could be a very inexpensive DSLR or m4/3 model with a single inexpensive prime lens (buying used could bring such a combo down into the $350 range). I'd personally avoid film, because digital lends itself to experimentation better... but an old inexpensive film SLR is certainly an option.

Now all of that isn't technically crucial for becoming a better photographer. You don't need those things to learn the art of composition or the importance of timing. The best camera in the world won't teach you how to recognize the best subjects, the best lighting, or the kinds of things and events that will give even a poorly executed photo (from a technical perspective) impact. For that you need to study photos that inspire you whether you find them online, in a book, or in an art gallery/museum. Books, classes, and online resources can also help tremendously. Many local community colleges and trade schools offer photography classes taught by local professional photographers. So you can certainly learn to be a better photographer using any camera, but if you're passionate about it you might quickly find that you've outgrown your smartphone or compact P&S.

As for the OP: He might find that the iPhone X is a great tool for the types of photos he likes to take. For us amateur/hobbyists, photography should be a fun activity with plenty of opportunities to explore. The iPhone X has some features that make me excited to use it as a camera, and I'm sure I will get plenty of photos and videos out of it along with my other camera gear. I can certainly see some people finding that it works for most of their photos, why bother with that other gear?


Sean
 
Last edited:
There is quite honestly a thick air of attitude directed at opposing opinions in this thread, and quite honestly it needs to stop.

I think we should be open to other peoples opinions, as well as being open to the idea that a great photographer may not be perfectly skilled or fully understand their personal kit. I have taken many great shots on a DSLR, even have a couple magazine covers. Yet, I can see value and still learn great skills on my phones that I can carry over to my DSLR. Some Photographers excel and take their best shots on "lesser" kit, I think we should avoid passing judgment on either side of the equipment argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redman042 and I7guy
He can’t tell the difference between his iPhone snaps and his Fuji’s, and doesn’t know why he owns the latter. Trust me, his photography skills aren’t in question.

Hey, as long as you don't mind coming off as a rude photography snob, have at it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: eyeseeyou
A lot of photography is related to Instagram anyhow so i feel DSLR is less of a need at a consumer level. Prosumer+ levels probably different

IG is a square box that fits in a small screen..
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyeseeyou
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.