i wanna fit a vertex 3 drive myself. will imacs ordered without ssd have an empty slot where one could fit one, or will I have to order a bto ssd machine and replace thenone apple ships with? really dont wanna eait 4-6 weeks
daneoni said:It no longer matters. The iMac has the z68 chipset, which is the bees' knees of the Sandy Bridge chipsets and hasn't actually been officially released yet. That means it does support SATA III, but perhaps it's hidden and something to do with Larsen Creek (also explains the long delays for the iMacs with SSDs)
Z68 also supprots SATA II no? Also supply issues are equally a valid reason for the SSD delay how are you so sure its Larsen Creek's fault?
Someone over in the Page 2 News thread did it...still 3Gb/s.Come on.. nobody has done the EFI update yet to see if they turned on SATA3?
Someone over in the Page 2 News thread did it...still 3Gb/s.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1147911/
Ah, you're right! Thanks for catching that, it was early this morning when I read through that.It looks like that was tested on a macbook pro, not an iMac.
Hi I've just done the efi update and get these in system profiler
Intel 6 Series Chipset:
Vendor: Intel
Product: 6 Series Chipset
Link Speed: 6 Gigabit
Negotiated Link Speed: 3 Gigabit
Description: AHCI Version 1.30 Supported
I think this means the Hd is now SATA III
hope this helps.
Hi I can confirm this is on The new 21.5" 2011 iMac 2.7 i5 ordered tuesday,delivered yesterday and updated a hour ago.
Thanks
Hi I've just done the efi update and get these in system profiler
Intel 6 Series Chipset:
Vendor: Intel
Product: 6 Series Chipset
Link Speed: 6 Gigabit
Negotiated Link Speed: 3 Gigabit
Description: AHCI Version 1.30 Supported
WDC WD1001FALS-403AA0:
Capacity: 1 TB (1,000,204,886,016 bytes)
Model: WDC WD1001FALS-403AA0
Revision: 06.01D02
Serial Number: WD-WCATR6234206
Native Command Queuing: Yes
Queue Depth: 32
Removable Media: No
Detachable Drive: No
BSD Name: disk0
Rotational Rate: 7200
Medium Type: Rotational
Partition Map Type: GPT (GUID Partition Table)
S.M.A.R.T. status: Verified
Volumes:
Capacity: 209.7 MB (209,715,200 bytes)
Writable: Yes
BSD Name: disk0s1
Macintosh HD:
Capacity: 999.86 GB (999,860,912,128 bytes)
Available: 967.35 GB (967,350,685,696 bytes)
Writable: Yes
File System: Journaled HFS+
BSD Name: disk0s2
Mount Point: /
for the Hd and this below for the optical
Intel 6 Series Chipset:
Vendor: Intel
Product: 6 Series Chipset
Link Speed: 3 Gigabit
Negotiated Link Speed: 1.5 Gigabit
Description: AHCI Version 1.30 Supported
OPTIARC DVD RW AD-5680H:
Model: OPTIARC DVD RW AD-5680H
Revision: 3AHF
Native Command Queuing: No
Detachable Drive: No
Power Off: Yes
Async Notification: No
I think this means the Hd is now SATA III
hope this helps.
As I was hoping iMac EFI Update 1.6 has enabled SATA 6 Gbit/s in the 2011 iMacs. Now SSDs can go beyond 400MB/s (6Gbit/s = 768MB/s) allowing for the Z68 chipset's SSD caching at optimum performance. Image
early 2009 mac minis had an efi update to go to 8gb ram so maybe these will. forces you to wait if absolute speed has meaning for you.
Intel 6 Series Chipset:
Vendor: Intel
Product: 6 Series Chipset
Link Speed: 6 Gigabit
Negotiated Link Speed: 3 Gigabit
Description: AHCI Version 1.30 Supported
WDC WD1001FALS-403AA0:
Capacity: 1 TB (1,000,204,886,016 bytes)
Model: WDC WD1001FALS-403AA0
Is the optical port sata3??
I was just going to replace the optical drive with vertex3 ssd..
Vendor: Intel
Product: 6 Series Chipset
Link Speed: 3 Gigabit
Negotiated Link Speed: 1.5 Gigabit
Description: AHCI Version 1.30 Supported
HL-DT-STDVDRW GA32N:
Model: HL-DT-STDVDRW GA32N
Revision: KE06
rather wait a couple of months
Can I just ask, and this is a serious question no rudeness or disrespect intended, why would you open up a 2011 iMac to fit an SSD? I'm considering an SSD upgrade in the future and I'd rather wait a couple of months, keep the warranty intact on the iMac, and buy a Thunderbolt external enclosure for the SSD drive. Obviously we'll have to see what performance is like but at least in terms of data transfer speed there shouldn't be much (if any) difference?