Do we need an antivirus on OS X?

[Apple_Robert]

1. That is the site you debunked:

"We Live Security comes from the brains at ESET – experienced researchers with in-depth knowledge of the latest threats and security trends. It’s an editorial outlet for internet security news, views and insight, covering the latest, breaking security news, alongside video tutorials, in-depth features, and podcasts. The site aims to cater for all skill levels, from battle-hardened coders to people just looking for advice on how to secure their data effectively.

ESET is home to some of the finest security researchers in the world and here you can read their thoughts and findings as they identify and analyze new security threats on a daily basis.

We Live Security is a truly international proposition, with research-teams in Slovakia, the USA, Canada, Germany and Argentina, our teams work around the globe (and around the clock) to bring you the latest security news and cutting edge research as it is released..."

http://www.welivesecurity.com/about-us/


2. That is the author you debunked:

Graham Cluley

INDEPENDENT SECURITY ANALYST
Graham Cluley is an award-winning security blogger, researcher and public speaker. He has been working in the computer security industry since the early 1990s, having been employed by companies such as Sophos, McAfee and Dr Solomon’s. He has given talks about computer security for some of the world’s largest companies, worked with law enforcement agencies on investigations into hacking groups, and regularly appears on TV and radio explaining computer security threats.

In 2011 he was inducted into the InfoSecurity Europe Hall of Fame.

http://www.welivesecurity.com/our-experts/#more

I didn't debunk anything. All I said was the links you provided was essentially pimping a specific product for purchase; and it was. I did not challenge his credentials, even though the first link was poorly written from a technical standpoint, in my opinion.

You seem to be taking my comments personally when you shouldn't. I did not speak negatively of the product in question, as I have never used it.

If people want to use the product, that is for them to decide, not anyone else. I haven't spoken ill of anyone using such products, although I have spoken ill of the meaningless back and forth between some posters.

The poster I replied to really didn't miss anything. If he wants, he can garner more specific and detailed information aside from the two links you provided. That is what my posting was about. No need to act like I made claims (about the product or his credentials) that you have to somehow defend, when I did no such thing.

I am not going to argue over it.

 

[OneAnswer]

1. That is the site you debunked:
2. That is the author you debunked:

That copy and paste job still does not validate the lacklustre content of the site you linked to.
There are dozens and more similar "articles" just like that, listing some malware and not providing any steps on how to prevent an attack, except downloading and installing the malware protection software affiliated with that "article".
Some might call it advertisement, it definitely is not journalism, or a scientific explanation or even help.

And that Hall Of Fame, does it provide help or knowledge? It is just a list of probably accomplished security experts, but those need food and shelter too, thus they work for someone and that someone will probably exploit that bit of fame for their own purposes.

If you really want, there are dozens and even more real articles, based on facts, providing knowledge and help about malware out there, like the Mac Malware Guide for example. Why do you not link to such more reputable sources instead of advertisement?

 

[S.B.G]

Mod note:

This thread has run its course and is now closed.